Cargando…
Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Mental healthcare users and patients were described as a particularly vulnerable group in the debate on the burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Just what this means and what normative conclusions can be derived from it depend to a large extent on the underlying concept of vulnerability. Wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3 |
_version_ | 1785042182548226048 |
---|---|
author | Faissner, Mirjam Werning, Anna Winkelkötter, Michael Foullois, Holger Löhr, Michael Gather, Jakov |
author_facet | Faissner, Mirjam Werning, Anna Winkelkötter, Michael Foullois, Holger Löhr, Michael Gather, Jakov |
author_sort | Faissner, Mirjam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mental healthcare users and patients were described as a particularly vulnerable group in the debate on the burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Just what this means and what normative conclusions can be derived from it depend to a large extent on the underlying concept of vulnerability. While a traditional understanding locates vulnerability in the characteristics of social groups, a situational and dynamic approach considers how social structures produce vulnerable social positions. The situation of users and patients in different psychosocial settings during the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been comprehensively considered and ethically analyzed under the aspect of situational vulnerability. METHODS: We present the results of a retrospective qualitative analysis of a survey of ethical challenges in different mental healthcare facilities of a large regional mental healthcare provider in Germany. We evaluate them ethically using a dynamic and situational understanding of vulnerability. RESULTS: Difficulties in implementing infection prevention measures, restrictions of mental health services in favor of infection prevention, social isolation, negative health effects on mental healthcare users and patients, and challenges in implementing regulations on state and provider levels within the local specificities emerged across different mental healthcare settings as ethically salient topics. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a situational and dynamic understanding of vulnerability allows the identification of specific factors and conditions that have contributed to an increased context-dependent vulnerability for mental healthcare users and patients. These factors and conditions should be considered on the level of state and local regulations to reduce and address vulnerability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10184624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101846242023-05-16 Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic Faissner, Mirjam Werning, Anna Winkelkötter, Michael Foullois, Holger Löhr, Michael Gather, Jakov BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Mental healthcare users and patients were described as a particularly vulnerable group in the debate on the burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Just what this means and what normative conclusions can be derived from it depend to a large extent on the underlying concept of vulnerability. While a traditional understanding locates vulnerability in the characteristics of social groups, a situational and dynamic approach considers how social structures produce vulnerable social positions. The situation of users and patients in different psychosocial settings during the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been comprehensively considered and ethically analyzed under the aspect of situational vulnerability. METHODS: We present the results of a retrospective qualitative analysis of a survey of ethical challenges in different mental healthcare facilities of a large regional mental healthcare provider in Germany. We evaluate them ethically using a dynamic and situational understanding of vulnerability. RESULTS: Difficulties in implementing infection prevention measures, restrictions of mental health services in favor of infection prevention, social isolation, negative health effects on mental healthcare users and patients, and challenges in implementing regulations on state and provider levels within the local specificities emerged across different mental healthcare settings as ethically salient topics. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a situational and dynamic understanding of vulnerability allows the identification of specific factors and conditions that have contributed to an increased context-dependent vulnerability for mental healthcare users and patients. These factors and conditions should be considered on the level of state and local regulations to reduce and address vulnerability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3. BioMed Central 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10184624/ /pubmed/37189115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Faissner, Mirjam Werning, Anna Winkelkötter, Michael Foullois, Holger Löhr, Michael Gather, Jakov Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | situational vulnerability within mental healthcare – a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00910-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faissnermirjam situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic AT werninganna situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic AT winkelkottermichael situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic AT foulloisholger situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic AT lohrmichael situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic AT gatherjakov situationalvulnerabilitywithinmentalhealthcareaqualitativeanalysisofethicalchallengesduringthecovid19pandemic |