Cargando…

Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions

Government controls over intimate relationships, imposed to limit the spread of Sars-CoV-2, were unprecedented in modern times. This study draws on data from qualitative interviews with 18 participants in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative web-panel survey of the British population (n = 6,654 peop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maxwell, Karen J., Bosó Pérez, Raquel, Reid, David, Freeman, Lily, Menezes, Dee, Sonnenberg, Pam, Field, Nigel, Mitchell, Kirstin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2078507
_version_ 1785042201111166976
author Maxwell, Karen J.
Bosó Pérez, Raquel
Reid, David
Freeman, Lily
Menezes, Dee
Sonnenberg, Pam
Field, Nigel
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
author_facet Maxwell, Karen J.
Bosó Pérez, Raquel
Reid, David
Freeman, Lily
Menezes, Dee
Sonnenberg, Pam
Field, Nigel
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
author_sort Maxwell, Karen J.
collection PubMed
description Government controls over intimate relationships, imposed to limit the spread of Sars-CoV-2, were unprecedented in modern times. This study draws on data from qualitative interviews with 18 participants in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative web-panel survey of the British population (n = 6,654 people), reporting that they had sex with someone from outside their household in the preceding four weeks; a period in which contact between households was restricted in the UK. Whilst only 10% of people reported sexual contact outside their household, among single people and those in non-cohabiting relationships, rates were much higher (Natsal-COVID). Our findings show that individuals did not take decisions to meet up with sexual partners lightly. Participants were motivated by needs—for connection, security, intimacy and a sense of normality. People balanced risks—of catching COVID-19, social judgement and punishment for rule-breaking—against other perceived risks, including to their mental health or relationships. We used situated rationality and social action theories of risk to demonstrate that people weighed up risk in socially situated ways and exhibited complex decision-making when deciding not to comply with restrictions. Understanding motivations for non-compliance is crucial to informing future public health messaging which accounts for the needs and circumstances of all population members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10184729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101847292023-05-16 Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions Maxwell, Karen J. Bosó Pérez, Raquel Reid, David Freeman, Lily Menezes, Dee Sonnenberg, Pam Field, Nigel Mitchell, Kirstin R. Cult Health Sex Articles Government controls over intimate relationships, imposed to limit the spread of Sars-CoV-2, were unprecedented in modern times. This study draws on data from qualitative interviews with 18 participants in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative web-panel survey of the British population (n = 6,654 people), reporting that they had sex with someone from outside their household in the preceding four weeks; a period in which contact between households was restricted in the UK. Whilst only 10% of people reported sexual contact outside their household, among single people and those in non-cohabiting relationships, rates were much higher (Natsal-COVID). Our findings show that individuals did not take decisions to meet up with sexual partners lightly. Participants were motivated by needs—for connection, security, intimacy and a sense of normality. People balanced risks—of catching COVID-19, social judgement and punishment for rule-breaking—against other perceived risks, including to their mental health or relationships. We used situated rationality and social action theories of risk to demonstrate that people weighed up risk in socially situated ways and exhibited complex decision-making when deciding not to comply with restrictions. Understanding motivations for non-compliance is crucial to informing future public health messaging which accounts for the needs and circumstances of all population members. Taylor & Francis 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10184729/ /pubmed/35674048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2078507 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Maxwell, Karen J.
Bosó Pérez, Raquel
Reid, David
Freeman, Lily
Menezes, Dee
Sonnenberg, Pam
Field, Nigel
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title_full Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title_fullStr Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title_full_unstemmed Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title_short Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions
title_sort balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during covid-19 social restrictions
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2078507
work_keys_str_mv AT maxwellkarenj balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT bosoperezraquel balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT reiddavid balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT freemanlily balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT menezesdee balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT sonnenbergpam balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT fieldnigel balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions
AT mitchellkirstinr balancingriskintimacyandnoncomplianceaqualitativestudyofsexacrosshouseholdduringcovid19socialrestrictions