Cargando…

Potential of Photon-Counting Detector CT for Radiation Dose Reduction for the Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

The aim of this study was to determine the potential of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for radiation dose reduction compared with conventional energy-integrated detector CT (EID-CT) in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jungblut, Lisa, Euler, André, von Spiczak, Jochen, Sartoretti, Thomas, Mergen, Victor, Englmaier, Vanessa, Landsmann, Anna, Mihai, Carmen-Marina, Distler, Oliver, Alkadhi, Hatem, Frauenfelder, Thomas, Martini, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000895
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this study was to determine the potential of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for radiation dose reduction compared with conventional energy-integrated detector CT (EID-CT) in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, SSc patients receiving a follow-up noncontrast chest examination on a PCD-CT were included between May 2021 and December 2021. Baseline scans were generated on a dual-source EID-CT by selecting the tube current-time product for each of the 2 x-ray tubes to obtain a 100% (D(100)), a 66% (D(66)), and a 33% dose image (D(33)) from the same data set. Slice thickness and kernel were adjusted between the 2 scans. Image noise was assessed by placing a fixed region of interest in the subcutaneous fat. Two independent readers rated subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale), presence, extent, diagnostic confidence, and accuracy of SSc-ILD. D(100) interpreted by a radiologist with 22 years of experience served as reference standard. Interobserver agreement was calculated with Cohen κ, and mean variables were compared by a paired t test. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean 56 ± 14; 64 women) were included. Although CTDI(vol) of PCD-CT was comparable to D(33) (0.72 vs 0.76 mGy, P = 0.091), mean image noise of PCD-CT was comparable to D(100) (131 ± 15 vs 113 ± 12, P > 0.05). Overall subjective image quality of PCD-CT was comparable to D(100) (4.72 vs 4.71; P = 0.874). Diagnostic accuracy was higher in PCD-CT compared with D(33)/D(66) (97.6% and 92.5%/96.3%, respectively) and comparable to D(100) (98.1%). CONCLUSIONS: With PCD-CT, a radiation dose reduction of 66% compared with EID-CT is feasible, without penalty in image quality and diagnostic performance for the evaluation of ILD.