Cargando…

Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice

BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is common and difficult to treat with limited treatment options. We assessed the efficacy of frequency rhythmic electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) in patients with PDPN. METHODS: An uncontrolled prospective survey of patients with PDP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imholz, Ben, Heijster, Jack, Tahrani, Abd, Kooy, Adriaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197061
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S401727
_version_ 1785042225689788416
author Imholz, Ben
Heijster, Jack
Tahrani, Abd
Kooy, Adriaan
author_facet Imholz, Ben
Heijster, Jack
Tahrani, Abd
Kooy, Adriaan
author_sort Imholz, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is common and difficult to treat with limited treatment options. We assessed the efficacy of frequency rhythmic electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) in patients with PDPN. METHODS: An uncontrolled prospective survey of patients with PDPN and pain despite at least two lines of pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome, 50% reduction in pain scores at 1 and/or 3 months post FREMS. FREMS was applied to both legs below the knees using 4 sets of electrodes per leg; the treatment consisted of 10 sessions of 35 min applications given over 14 days. FREMS was repeated every 4 months and patients were followed up for 12 months. Pain was assessed using the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) and quality of life (QOL) by the EQ-5D. RESULTS: Out of 336 subjects, 248 patients met the inclusion criteria (56% men), average age and diabetes duration were 65 and 12.6 years respectively. FREMS was associated with a median decrease NPSI of 31% at M1 (range −100;+93%), and a median decrease of −37.5% at M3 (range −100;+250%). The 50% reduction in pain was reached in 80/248 (32.3%) and 87/248 (35.1%) after M1 and M3 respectively. The change in NPSI was accompanied by a decrease in self reported use of opiates of >50%. CONCLUSION: FREMS treatment was associated with a significant reduction in pain severity over a three months period in patients who did not have adequate response to pharmacotherapy. Randomised (sham)-controlled trials examining the role of FREMS as a treatment for PDPN in non-responders to pharmacotherapy are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10184859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101848592023-05-16 Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice Imholz, Ben Heijster, Jack Tahrani, Abd Kooy, Adriaan Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is common and difficult to treat with limited treatment options. We assessed the efficacy of frequency rhythmic electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) in patients with PDPN. METHODS: An uncontrolled prospective survey of patients with PDPN and pain despite at least two lines of pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome, 50% reduction in pain scores at 1 and/or 3 months post FREMS. FREMS was applied to both legs below the knees using 4 sets of electrodes per leg; the treatment consisted of 10 sessions of 35 min applications given over 14 days. FREMS was repeated every 4 months and patients were followed up for 12 months. Pain was assessed using the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) and quality of life (QOL) by the EQ-5D. RESULTS: Out of 336 subjects, 248 patients met the inclusion criteria (56% men), average age and diabetes duration were 65 and 12.6 years respectively. FREMS was associated with a median decrease NPSI of 31% at M1 (range −100;+93%), and a median decrease of −37.5% at M3 (range −100;+250%). The 50% reduction in pain was reached in 80/248 (32.3%) and 87/248 (35.1%) after M1 and M3 respectively. The change in NPSI was accompanied by a decrease in self reported use of opiates of >50%. CONCLUSION: FREMS treatment was associated with a significant reduction in pain severity over a three months period in patients who did not have adequate response to pharmacotherapy. Randomised (sham)-controlled trials examining the role of FREMS as a treatment for PDPN in non-responders to pharmacotherapy are needed. Dove 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10184859/ /pubmed/37197061 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S401727 Text en © 2023 Imholz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Imholz, Ben
Heijster, Jack
Tahrani, Abd
Kooy, Adriaan
Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title_full Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title_fullStr Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title_short Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Frequency Rhythmic Electro Magnetic Neural Stimulation (FREMS); Effectiveness in Daily Practice
title_sort treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy using frequency rhythmic electro magnetic neural stimulation (frems); effectiveness in daily practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197061
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S401727
work_keys_str_mv AT imholzben treatmentofpainfuldiabeticneuropathyusingfrequencyrhythmicelectromagneticneuralstimulationfremseffectivenessindailypractice
AT heijsterjack treatmentofpainfuldiabeticneuropathyusingfrequencyrhythmicelectromagneticneuralstimulationfremseffectivenessindailypractice
AT tahraniabd treatmentofpainfuldiabeticneuropathyusingfrequencyrhythmicelectromagneticneuralstimulationfremseffectivenessindailypractice
AT kooyadriaan treatmentofpainfuldiabeticneuropathyusingfrequencyrhythmicelectromagneticneuralstimulationfremseffectivenessindailypractice