Cargando…
713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a diagnostic challenge in all critically ill patients, but particularly so in the burn patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the modified sepsis-3 criteria defined as an acute change in SOFA score ≥2 was predictive of clinical infection. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184927/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.189 |
_version_ | 1785042240136019968 |
---|---|
author | Avery, Emma Zhu, Jane Rehou, Sarah Sharohki, Shahriar |
author_facet | Avery, Emma Zhu, Jane Rehou, Sarah Sharohki, Shahriar |
author_sort | Avery, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a diagnostic challenge in all critically ill patients, but particularly so in the burn patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the modified sepsis-3 criteria defined as an acute change in SOFA score ≥2 was predictive of clinical infection. METHODS: The hospital database was reviewed between 2016 and 2019 to identify patients who received broad spectrum antibiotics within 2 days of sustaining their injury. Culture specimens taken at the time of antibiotic administration determined presence of a clinical infection. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 98 patients were admitted to the burn unit within 2 days of their injury and received prophylactic meropenum and/or piperacillin/tazobactam for suspicion of clinical infection. When stratified based on an acute change in SOFA score within 48 hours prior to receiving antibiotics, 67 (72%) patients received antibiotics with an acute change in SOFA score ≤1, and 26 (27%) patients received antibiotics with an acute change in SOFA score ≥2. Of those patients with the acute change in SOFA score ≥2, 22 patients (85%) had positive cultures associated with the timing of prophylactic antibiotics, as compared to 60 patients (90%) with a change in SOFA score ≤1 (p value 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that the modified sepsis-3 criteria is not a reliable tool for diagnosing burn sepsis. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Improving our ability to accurately predict sepsis in burn patients can improve patient outcomes and decrease unnecessary administration of broad spectrum antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10184927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101849272023-05-16 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients Avery, Emma Zhu, Jane Rehou, Sarah Sharohki, Shahriar J Burn Care Res R-222 Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 4 INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a diagnostic challenge in all critically ill patients, but particularly so in the burn patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the modified sepsis-3 criteria defined as an acute change in SOFA score ≥2 was predictive of clinical infection. METHODS: The hospital database was reviewed between 2016 and 2019 to identify patients who received broad spectrum antibiotics within 2 days of sustaining their injury. Culture specimens taken at the time of antibiotic administration determined presence of a clinical infection. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 98 patients were admitted to the burn unit within 2 days of their injury and received prophylactic meropenum and/or piperacillin/tazobactam for suspicion of clinical infection. When stratified based on an acute change in SOFA score within 48 hours prior to receiving antibiotics, 67 (72%) patients received antibiotics with an acute change in SOFA score ≤1, and 26 (27%) patients received antibiotics with an acute change in SOFA score ≥2. Of those patients with the acute change in SOFA score ≥2, 22 patients (85%) had positive cultures associated with the timing of prophylactic antibiotics, as compared to 60 patients (90%) with a change in SOFA score ≤1 (p value 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that the modified sepsis-3 criteria is not a reliable tool for diagnosing burn sepsis. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Improving our ability to accurately predict sepsis in burn patients can improve patient outcomes and decrease unnecessary administration of broad spectrum antibiotics. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10184927/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.189 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | R-222 Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 4 Avery, Emma Zhu, Jane Rehou, Sarah Sharohki, Shahriar 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title | 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title_full | 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title_fullStr | 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title_short | 713 Acute Change in qSOFA Score as a Prognostic Tool for Diagnosing Sepsis in Burn Patients |
title_sort | 713 acute change in qsofa score as a prognostic tool for diagnosing sepsis in burn patients |
topic | R-222 Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 4 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184927/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT averyemma 713acutechangeinqsofascoreasaprognostictoolfordiagnosingsepsisinburnpatients AT zhujane 713acutechangeinqsofascoreasaprognostictoolfordiagnosingsepsisinburnpatients AT rehousarah 713acutechangeinqsofascoreasaprognostictoolfordiagnosingsepsisinburnpatients AT sharohkishahriar 713acutechangeinqsofascoreasaprognostictoolfordiagnosingsepsisinburnpatients |