Cargando…

54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment

INTRODUCTION: Many providers utilize prophylactic cephalexin prior to Co2 ablation laser for hypertrophic scarring. Many providers use this as standard of treatment despite a paucity of high-quality literature supporting the practice. The purpose of this study is to report a single-center experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kevin, Records, Munnerlyn, Brittany, Kahn, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184934/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.028
_version_ 1785042241811644416
author Kevin, Records
Munnerlyn, Brittany
Kahn, Steven
author_facet Kevin, Records
Munnerlyn, Brittany
Kahn, Steven
author_sort Kevin, Records
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many providers utilize prophylactic cephalexin prior to Co2 ablation laser for hypertrophic scarring. Many providers use this as standard of treatment despite a paucity of high-quality literature supporting the practice. The purpose of this study is to report a single-center experience in performing laser-assisted delivery of triamcinolone and destruction of burn scars without the use of antibiotics. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study from a single center with a new laser scar program. The first 14 patients received cephalexin 500mg by mouth every 6 hours starting the day of the procedure for 5 days and valaciclovir 1000mg by mouth daily for 5 days for their first two procedures- as per manufacturer recommendations. After that, cephalexin was no longer utilized nor were any antibiotics given at the start time of procedure. Valacyclovir is given on a case-by-case basis for patients with a history of cold sores, known herpes simplex, or extensive facial procedures. Burn team staff members followed up with the patients within 48 -72 hours by phone call. Burn staff called patients after each laser treatment to assess for any adverse reactions. Adverse reactions include open areas, rashes, or blisters to laser site. The two groups were compared with a Fisher’s exact test for number of infections. RESULTS: Patients who received cephalexin accounted for the first 28 cases and none developed an infection. In 201 cases without antibiotics, only one patient developed cellulitis (0.5%), p=1. This patient was noncompliant with restrictions on hand hygiene and used a cheap lotion with parabens, dyes, and perfumes on post operative day 2. Another patient experienced a self-limiting dermatitis on their back of uncertain etiology. In 36 cases, valacyclovir was given. None of the patients in either group developed vesicular lesions consistent with HSV. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in number of infections whether patients treated with or without prophylactic antibiotics before laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. The authors continue to treat patients without administering prophylactic antibiotics. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: laser programs are common in burn centers
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10184934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101849342023-05-16 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment Kevin, Records Munnerlyn, Brittany Kahn, Steven J Burn Care Res C-251 Correlative VII: Clinical Sciences: Wounds and Scars / Nutrition Metabolism INTRODUCTION: Many providers utilize prophylactic cephalexin prior to Co2 ablation laser for hypertrophic scarring. Many providers use this as standard of treatment despite a paucity of high-quality literature supporting the practice. The purpose of this study is to report a single-center experience in performing laser-assisted delivery of triamcinolone and destruction of burn scars without the use of antibiotics. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study from a single center with a new laser scar program. The first 14 patients received cephalexin 500mg by mouth every 6 hours starting the day of the procedure for 5 days and valaciclovir 1000mg by mouth daily for 5 days for their first two procedures- as per manufacturer recommendations. After that, cephalexin was no longer utilized nor were any antibiotics given at the start time of procedure. Valacyclovir is given on a case-by-case basis for patients with a history of cold sores, known herpes simplex, or extensive facial procedures. Burn team staff members followed up with the patients within 48 -72 hours by phone call. Burn staff called patients after each laser treatment to assess for any adverse reactions. Adverse reactions include open areas, rashes, or blisters to laser site. The two groups were compared with a Fisher’s exact test for number of infections. RESULTS: Patients who received cephalexin accounted for the first 28 cases and none developed an infection. In 201 cases without antibiotics, only one patient developed cellulitis (0.5%), p=1. This patient was noncompliant with restrictions on hand hygiene and used a cheap lotion with parabens, dyes, and perfumes on post operative day 2. Another patient experienced a self-limiting dermatitis on their back of uncertain etiology. In 36 cases, valacyclovir was given. None of the patients in either group developed vesicular lesions consistent with HSV. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in number of infections whether patients treated with or without prophylactic antibiotics before laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. The authors continue to treat patients without administering prophylactic antibiotics. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: laser programs are common in burn centers Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10184934/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.028 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C-251 Correlative VII: Clinical Sciences: Wounds and Scars / Nutrition Metabolism
Kevin, Records
Munnerlyn, Brittany
Kahn, Steven
54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title_full 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title_fullStr 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title_full_unstemmed 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title_short 54 Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment
title_sort 54 prophylactic antibiotics are unnecessary for routine co2 laser burn scar treatment
topic C-251 Correlative VII: Clinical Sciences: Wounds and Scars / Nutrition Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184934/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.028
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinrecords 54prophylacticantibioticsareunnecessaryforroutineco2laserburnscartreatment
AT munnerlynbrittany 54prophylacticantibioticsareunnecessaryforroutineco2laserburnscartreatment
AT kahnsteven 54prophylacticantibioticsareunnecessaryforroutineco2laserburnscartreatment