Cargando…

Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss

INTRODUCTION: Testis is essential for male sexual hormone production, fertility, and psychological well-being of a male. In the unfortunate event of testicular loss, placement of a testicular prosthesis perhaps will offer a sense of well-being, improved body image, and overall confidence in the grow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh, Konamme, Vinay Kumar, Saroja, Murali Govindappa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197240
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_100_22
_version_ 1785042262633218048
author Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh
Konamme, Vinay Kumar
Saroja, Murali Govindappa
author_facet Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh
Konamme, Vinay Kumar
Saroja, Murali Govindappa
author_sort Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Testis is essential for male sexual hormone production, fertility, and psychological well-being of a male. In the unfortunate event of testicular loss, placement of a testicular prosthesis perhaps will offer a sense of well-being, improved body image, and overall confidence in the growing child. AIMS: The aim is to evaluate the feasibility and assessment of outcomes following concurrent placement of testicular prosthesis in children following orchiectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted by reviewing the reports of patients who underwent simultaneous insertion testicular prosthesis following orchiectomy for various indications between January 2014 and December 2020 at tertiary hospitals in Bengaluru. Children <18 years were included in this study. A transscrotal approach was preferred in cases where a transscrotal orchiectomy was done. Transinguinal approach was preferred in children undergoing prosthesis insertion as an isolated procedure. The size of the prosthesis was chosen based on the age of the child and the size of the scrotum. Outcomes were assessed on follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 29 children underwent prosthesis insertion (25 unilateral and four bilateral). The mean standard deviation age was 5.58 (3.92) years. The indications for prosthesis insertion were cryptorchidism with atrophic testis (22), torsion (3), Leydig cell tumor (2), and severely virilized Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) (2). Of these, three children (9%) had complications (wound gaping in two and wound infection in one) that needed removal of the implant. The mean duration of follow-up was 49.23 months. All the parents reported a good outcome, and none of the children who underwent prosthesis placement needed a change during this follow-up. CONCLUSION: Concurrent placement of a testicular prosthesis is technically easy and a safe procedure, achieves satisfactory cosmetic appearance with minimal morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101850282023-05-16 Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh Konamme, Vinay Kumar Saroja, Murali Govindappa J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Testis is essential for male sexual hormone production, fertility, and psychological well-being of a male. In the unfortunate event of testicular loss, placement of a testicular prosthesis perhaps will offer a sense of well-being, improved body image, and overall confidence in the growing child. AIMS: The aim is to evaluate the feasibility and assessment of outcomes following concurrent placement of testicular prosthesis in children following orchiectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted by reviewing the reports of patients who underwent simultaneous insertion testicular prosthesis following orchiectomy for various indications between January 2014 and December 2020 at tertiary hospitals in Bengaluru. Children <18 years were included in this study. A transscrotal approach was preferred in cases where a transscrotal orchiectomy was done. Transinguinal approach was preferred in children undergoing prosthesis insertion as an isolated procedure. The size of the prosthesis was chosen based on the age of the child and the size of the scrotum. Outcomes were assessed on follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 29 children underwent prosthesis insertion (25 unilateral and four bilateral). The mean standard deviation age was 5.58 (3.92) years. The indications for prosthesis insertion were cryptorchidism with atrophic testis (22), torsion (3), Leydig cell tumor (2), and severely virilized Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) (2). Of these, three children (9%) had complications (wound gaping in two and wound infection in one) that needed removal of the implant. The mean duration of follow-up was 49.23 months. All the parents reported a good outcome, and none of the children who underwent prosthesis placement needed a change during this follow-up. CONCLUSION: Concurrent placement of a testicular prosthesis is technically easy and a safe procedure, achieves satisfactory cosmetic appearance with minimal morbidity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10185028/ /pubmed/37197240 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_100_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Santhanakrishnan, Ramesh
Konamme, Vinay Kumar
Saroja, Murali Govindappa
Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title_full Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title_fullStr Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title_short Concurrent Placement of the Testicular Prosthesis in Children Following Orchiectomy/Testicular Loss
title_sort concurrent placement of the testicular prosthesis in children following orchiectomy/testicular loss
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197240
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_100_22
work_keys_str_mv AT santhanakrishnanramesh concurrentplacementofthetesticularprosthesisinchildrenfollowingorchiectomytesticularloss
AT konammevinaykumar concurrentplacementofthetesticularprosthesisinchildrenfollowingorchiectomytesticularloss
AT sarojamuraligovindappa concurrentplacementofthetesticularprosthesisinchildrenfollowingorchiectomytesticularloss