Cargando…

547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition is a critical component to recovery in burn patients. Their heightened metabolic demand is well established. In our burn population, patients often received significantly less volume of feeds than they were prescribed, primarily due to stoppages for sedations and procedures....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levine, Emma, Dale Slater, Elizabeth, Slutsky, Hanna, Ladele, Olatundun, Gondek, Stephen, Wagner, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185075/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.144
_version_ 1785042273159872512
author Levine, Emma
Dale Slater, Elizabeth
Slutsky, Hanna
Ladele, Olatundun
Gondek, Stephen
Wagner, Anne
author_facet Levine, Emma
Dale Slater, Elizabeth
Slutsky, Hanna
Ladele, Olatundun
Gondek, Stephen
Wagner, Anne
author_sort Levine, Emma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nutrition is a critical component to recovery in burn patients. Their heightened metabolic demand is well established. In our burn population, patients often received significantly less volume of feeds than they were prescribed, primarily due to stoppages for sedations and procedures. We, therefore, developed a quality improvement (QI) project to help improve the quantity of feeds received. METHODS: Under the direction of nursing QI leadership and our burn nutritionist, we established an outcome measure of increasing average feeds received from baseline 68% of those prescribed to greater than 75% of those prescribed. Using a process of iterative changes, we initially developed a calculator for volume-based feeds to make up the volume lost during times tube feeds were paused. Nursing staff gave feedback, and we ultimately used a chart for adjusted volumes based on the total 24 hour goal and number of hours remaining in which to make up the goal. On a bi-weekly basis, we examined the amount of tube feeds as a percent of total prescribed prior to and after the interventions. RESULTS: Early results have demonstrated improvements in the percent of tube feeds a burn patient is receiving. Prior to the interventions patients were receiving about 68% of the prescribed tube feeds and within 6 weeks of project initiation, patients were receiving 82% of the prescribed tube feeds (Figure 1). In addition, variability in feeds received decreased markedly, as have number of days above the target. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this has been an effective QI intervention as we surpassed our initial target within 6 weeks of initiation. Next steps are to consider increasing the target to 90% of prescribed feeds, as well as investigating adequacy of feeds using nitrogen balance in select patients. Future directions for this project include assessing outcome measures such as graft take and hospital length of stay. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Purpose is to share our methods in quality improvement to aid others efforts facing similar challenges in the care of the critically ill burn patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101850752023-05-16 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition Levine, Emma Dale Slater, Elizabeth Slutsky, Hanna Ladele, Olatundun Gondek, Stephen Wagner, Anne J Burn Care Res R-129 Quality Improvement 1 INTRODUCTION: Nutrition is a critical component to recovery in burn patients. Their heightened metabolic demand is well established. In our burn population, patients often received significantly less volume of feeds than they were prescribed, primarily due to stoppages for sedations and procedures. We, therefore, developed a quality improvement (QI) project to help improve the quantity of feeds received. METHODS: Under the direction of nursing QI leadership and our burn nutritionist, we established an outcome measure of increasing average feeds received from baseline 68% of those prescribed to greater than 75% of those prescribed. Using a process of iterative changes, we initially developed a calculator for volume-based feeds to make up the volume lost during times tube feeds were paused. Nursing staff gave feedback, and we ultimately used a chart for adjusted volumes based on the total 24 hour goal and number of hours remaining in which to make up the goal. On a bi-weekly basis, we examined the amount of tube feeds as a percent of total prescribed prior to and after the interventions. RESULTS: Early results have demonstrated improvements in the percent of tube feeds a burn patient is receiving. Prior to the interventions patients were receiving about 68% of the prescribed tube feeds and within 6 weeks of project initiation, patients were receiving 82% of the prescribed tube feeds (Figure 1). In addition, variability in feeds received decreased markedly, as have number of days above the target. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this has been an effective QI intervention as we surpassed our initial target within 6 weeks of initiation. Next steps are to consider increasing the target to 90% of prescribed feeds, as well as investigating adequacy of feeds using nitrogen balance in select patients. Future directions for this project include assessing outcome measures such as graft take and hospital length of stay. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Purpose is to share our methods in quality improvement to aid others efforts facing similar challenges in the care of the critically ill burn patient. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185075/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.144 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle R-129 Quality Improvement 1
Levine, Emma
Dale Slater, Elizabeth
Slutsky, Hanna
Ladele, Olatundun
Gondek, Stephen
Wagner, Anne
547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title_full 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title_fullStr 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title_full_unstemmed 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title_short 547 Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition
title_sort 547 volume-based feeds: a quality improvement project for better nutrition
topic R-129 Quality Improvement 1
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185075/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.144
work_keys_str_mv AT levineemma 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition
AT daleslaterelizabeth 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition
AT slutskyhanna 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition
AT ladeleolatundun 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition
AT gondekstephen 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition
AT wagneranne 547volumebasedfeedsaqualityimprovementprojectforbetternutrition