Cargando…

78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts

INTRODUCTION: Autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are the preferred donor tissue for restoration of large tissue deficits. Although grafting should be done at the time of donor harvest, various factors necessitate tissue storage, traditionally in saline solution (SS) at 4(o)C. However, ST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Couch, Brandon, Batchinsky, Maria, Pang, Alan, Warraich, Irfan, Melkus, Michael, Kim, Seungman, Bharadia, Deepak, Griswold, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.052
_version_ 1785042293064990720
author Couch, Brandon
Batchinsky, Maria
Pang, Alan
Warraich, Irfan
Melkus, Michael
Kim, Seungman
Bharadia, Deepak
Griswold, John
author_facet Couch, Brandon
Batchinsky, Maria
Pang, Alan
Warraich, Irfan
Melkus, Michael
Kim, Seungman
Bharadia, Deepak
Griswold, John
author_sort Couch, Brandon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are the preferred donor tissue for restoration of large tissue deficits. Although grafting should be done at the time of donor harvest, various factors necessitate tissue storage, traditionally in saline solution (SS) at 4(o)C. However, STSGs often expire before grafting in these conditions. Patients then require further excision procedures or die due to inadequate skin coverage. For patients’ wellbeing, establishing a new storage protocol is imperative. This study sought to determine an effective storage media for prolongation of graft viability for subsequent incorporation into excision and grafting practice. METHODS: Following patient consent, excess tissue >1cm(2) was collected after grafting procedures. Tissue was stored at 4(o)C in RPMI, DMEM, and SS with penicillin/streptomycin. Samples were evaluated at 2, 5, 7, and 14 days. Cell viability was measured by Trypan blue dye exclusion test in an automated cell counter yielding percentage of viable keratinocytes (PVK). An unbiased pathologist assessed tissue integrity by epidermal-dermal junction, perinuclear keratinocyte halos, and collagen organization with higher scores denoting deterioration. Data were evaluated by ANOVA and Effect size. RESULTS: A total of 155 sets of two specimens each were collected from 13 patients. Mean PVK values at day 2, 5, 7, and 14: SS (57.38, 36.96, 38.38, 27.50), RPMI (69.46, 69.92, 70.33, 62.67), DMEM (63.17, 53.50, 54.83, 37.92). By pairwise comparison, RPMI preserved PVK better than SS at days 5, 7, and 14 (p = 0.001 for each day). DMEM preserved PVK better than SS when comparing all days (p = 0.011) but failed to produce a statistically significant difference at any specific day. RPMI preserved PVK greater than DMEM each day. However, statistically significant differences were only revealed at day 14 (p = 0.017) and when comparing all days (p < 0.001). Effect size was large for overall group differences of PVK at day 5, 7, and 14 (Cohen’s f = 0.72, 0.73, and 0.75). Tissue integrity scores at day 2, 5, 7, and 14: SS (0.69, 1.0, 1.38, 2.0), RPMI (0.54, 0.92, 0.85, 1.54), DMEM (0.77, 0.92, 0.77, 1.15). Although culture media preserved tissue integrity greater than SS, no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: RPMI preserved cell viability better than DMEM and SS. This suggests that STSGs stored in RPMI may prolong the time of which tissue could be stored and successfully amalgamated with skin. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Storing tissue in RPMI could benefit burn patients by decreasing tissue disposal therefore reducing future donor site area or eliminating repetitious excision procedures entirely. These effects decrease inpatient days and healthcare costs. Most importantly, successful tissue storage will save patients’ lives, especially those of large surface area burns who lack sufficient donor sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101851612023-05-16 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts Couch, Brandon Batchinsky, Maria Pang, Alan Warraich, Irfan Melkus, Michael Kim, Seungman Bharadia, Deepak Griswold, John J Burn Care Res C-254 Correlative X: Translational Sciences: Wounds and Scars INTRODUCTION: Autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are the preferred donor tissue for restoration of large tissue deficits. Although grafting should be done at the time of donor harvest, various factors necessitate tissue storage, traditionally in saline solution (SS) at 4(o)C. However, STSGs often expire before grafting in these conditions. Patients then require further excision procedures or die due to inadequate skin coverage. For patients’ wellbeing, establishing a new storage protocol is imperative. This study sought to determine an effective storage media for prolongation of graft viability for subsequent incorporation into excision and grafting practice. METHODS: Following patient consent, excess tissue >1cm(2) was collected after grafting procedures. Tissue was stored at 4(o)C in RPMI, DMEM, and SS with penicillin/streptomycin. Samples were evaluated at 2, 5, 7, and 14 days. Cell viability was measured by Trypan blue dye exclusion test in an automated cell counter yielding percentage of viable keratinocytes (PVK). An unbiased pathologist assessed tissue integrity by epidermal-dermal junction, perinuclear keratinocyte halos, and collagen organization with higher scores denoting deterioration. Data were evaluated by ANOVA and Effect size. RESULTS: A total of 155 sets of two specimens each were collected from 13 patients. Mean PVK values at day 2, 5, 7, and 14: SS (57.38, 36.96, 38.38, 27.50), RPMI (69.46, 69.92, 70.33, 62.67), DMEM (63.17, 53.50, 54.83, 37.92). By pairwise comparison, RPMI preserved PVK better than SS at days 5, 7, and 14 (p = 0.001 for each day). DMEM preserved PVK better than SS when comparing all days (p = 0.011) but failed to produce a statistically significant difference at any specific day. RPMI preserved PVK greater than DMEM each day. However, statistically significant differences were only revealed at day 14 (p = 0.017) and when comparing all days (p < 0.001). Effect size was large for overall group differences of PVK at day 5, 7, and 14 (Cohen’s f = 0.72, 0.73, and 0.75). Tissue integrity scores at day 2, 5, 7, and 14: SS (0.69, 1.0, 1.38, 2.0), RPMI (0.54, 0.92, 0.85, 1.54), DMEM (0.77, 0.92, 0.77, 1.15). Although culture media preserved tissue integrity greater than SS, no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: RPMI preserved cell viability better than DMEM and SS. This suggests that STSGs stored in RPMI may prolong the time of which tissue could be stored and successfully amalgamated with skin. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Storing tissue in RPMI could benefit burn patients by decreasing tissue disposal therefore reducing future donor site area or eliminating repetitious excision procedures entirely. These effects decrease inpatient days and healthcare costs. Most importantly, successful tissue storage will save patients’ lives, especially those of large surface area burns who lack sufficient donor sites. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185161/ /pubmed/36567469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.052 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C-254 Correlative X: Translational Sciences: Wounds and Scars
Couch, Brandon
Batchinsky, Maria
Pang, Alan
Warraich, Irfan
Melkus, Michael
Kim, Seungman
Bharadia, Deepak
Griswold, John
78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title_full 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title_fullStr 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title_full_unstemmed 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title_short 78 Improvement of Cell Viability in Temporary Storage of Split Thickness Skin Grafts
title_sort 78 improvement of cell viability in temporary storage of split thickness skin grafts
topic C-254 Correlative X: Translational Sciences: Wounds and Scars
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.052
work_keys_str_mv AT couchbrandon 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT batchinskymaria 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT pangalan 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT warraichirfan 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT melkusmichael 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT kimseungman 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT bharadiadeepak 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts
AT griswoldjohn 78improvementofcellviabilityintemporarystorageofsplitthicknessskingrafts