Cargando…

82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION: Research regarding the prevalence of psychopathology issues in burn-injured youth is limited. The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is valid for both self- and parent-report, and is widely used. This study sought to evaluate the level of agreement between the youth self-rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rimmer, Ruth, Bay, Curt, Kalil, Emile, Chacon, Daniel, Mendoza, Erika, Foster, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.056
_version_ 1785042295975837696
author Rimmer, Ruth
Bay, Curt
Kalil, Emile
Chacon, Daniel
Mendoza, Erika
Foster, Kevin
author_facet Rimmer, Ruth
Bay, Curt
Kalil, Emile
Chacon, Daniel
Mendoza, Erika
Foster, Kevin
author_sort Rimmer, Ruth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Research regarding the prevalence of psychopathology issues in burn-injured youth is limited. The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is valid for both self- and parent-report, and is widely used. This study sought to evaluate the level of agreement between the youth self-report and parental response. METHODS: Respondents included 36 adolescent/parent dyads. The youth included 11-18 years old, 14% African American, 19% Hispanic and 44% White, 19 females, 17 males with 58% reporting both visible & hidden scars. The SDQ is a widely used behavioral screening tool assessing children’s positive & negative attributes on 5 scales: 1) Emotional Symptoms, 2) Conduct Problems, 3) Hyperactivity/Inattention, 4) Peer Problems, 5) Prosocial Behavior as well as a Total Difficulties Score. RESULTS: Youth reported significantly higher scores than parents on Total Difficulty (P < 0.001). They had significantly higher scores on all scale scores – Emotional Problems (P = 0.01), Hyperactivity (P = 0.001), Conduct Problems (P = 0.041), Peer Problems (P=0.041), Internalizing (P = 0.005), and Externalizing Behaviors ((P < 0.001), but not the Pro-Social Scale (P=0.303). Correlations between self- and parent-report were significant only for the Hyperactivity scale, r=.40, p=0.017. CONCLUSIONS: The large difference in youth vs. parent responses is of concern because study parents appear to be unaware of psychosocial issues challenging their children. This study mirrors other research which has documented a lack of awareness of parents regarding children’s reported anxiety disorder symptomology. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Healthcare providers & parents should discuss burn-injured youths’ feelings regarding their progress. Providers should not rely solely on parents when determining the well-being of pediatric survivors. This survey can be completed easily by youth and parents in the aftercare setting and used as a tool for recommending intervention when difficulties are present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101851732023-05-16 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Rimmer, Ruth Bay, Curt Kalil, Emile Chacon, Daniel Mendoza, Erika Foster, Kevin J Burn Care Res C-255 Correlative XI: Psychological and Psychosocial INTRODUCTION: Research regarding the prevalence of psychopathology issues in burn-injured youth is limited. The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is valid for both self- and parent-report, and is widely used. This study sought to evaluate the level of agreement between the youth self-report and parental response. METHODS: Respondents included 36 adolescent/parent dyads. The youth included 11-18 years old, 14% African American, 19% Hispanic and 44% White, 19 females, 17 males with 58% reporting both visible & hidden scars. The SDQ is a widely used behavioral screening tool assessing children’s positive & negative attributes on 5 scales: 1) Emotional Symptoms, 2) Conduct Problems, 3) Hyperactivity/Inattention, 4) Peer Problems, 5) Prosocial Behavior as well as a Total Difficulties Score. RESULTS: Youth reported significantly higher scores than parents on Total Difficulty (P < 0.001). They had significantly higher scores on all scale scores – Emotional Problems (P = 0.01), Hyperactivity (P = 0.001), Conduct Problems (P = 0.041), Peer Problems (P=0.041), Internalizing (P = 0.005), and Externalizing Behaviors ((P < 0.001), but not the Pro-Social Scale (P=0.303). Correlations between self- and parent-report were significant only for the Hyperactivity scale, r=.40, p=0.017. CONCLUSIONS: The large difference in youth vs. parent responses is of concern because study parents appear to be unaware of psychosocial issues challenging their children. This study mirrors other research which has documented a lack of awareness of parents regarding children’s reported anxiety disorder symptomology. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Healthcare providers & parents should discuss burn-injured youths’ feelings regarding their progress. Providers should not rely solely on parents when determining the well-being of pediatric survivors. This survey can be completed easily by youth and parents in the aftercare setting and used as a tool for recommending intervention when difficulties are present. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185173/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.056 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C-255 Correlative XI: Psychological and Psychosocial
Rimmer, Ruth
Bay, Curt
Kalil, Emile
Chacon, Daniel
Mendoza, Erika
Foster, Kevin
82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_full 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_fullStr 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_short 82 Comparison of Parent vs. Burn-Injured Youth Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_sort 82 comparison of parent vs. burn-injured youth scores on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
topic C-255 Correlative XI: Psychological and Psychosocial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.056
work_keys_str_mv AT rimmerruth 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT baycurt 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT kalilemile 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT chacondaniel 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT mendozaerika 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT fosterkevin 82comparisonofparentvsburninjuredyouthscoresonthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire