Cargando…

89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay

INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) is a crucial element to patient care plans, hospital profit, and a patient’s well-being. However, predicting LOS is difficult as burn injuries often have complications. The expectation for LOS in the burn ward is generally one day per percent total body surface are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bandaru, Vishal, Youssi, Brandon, Morgan, Ryan, Nguyen, Kevin, Liu, Xiyu, Chaudhury, Tristin, Gani, Zarif, Shaw, Chip, Pang, Alan, Griswold, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185204/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.062
_version_ 1785042303458476032
author Bandaru, Vishal
Youssi, Brandon
Morgan, Ryan
Nguyen, Kevin
Liu, Xiyu
Chaudhury, Tristin
Gani, Zarif
Shaw, Chip
Pang, Alan
Griswold, John
author_facet Bandaru, Vishal
Youssi, Brandon
Morgan, Ryan
Nguyen, Kevin
Liu, Xiyu
Chaudhury, Tristin
Gani, Zarif
Shaw, Chip
Pang, Alan
Griswold, John
author_sort Bandaru, Vishal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) is a crucial element to patient care plans, hospital profit, and a patient’s well-being. However, predicting LOS is difficult as burn injuries often have complications. The expectation for LOS in the burn ward is generally one day per percent total body surface area (TBSA) burned. This prediction approximates the average but rarely represents true patient LOS. Healing times for second and third-degree burns differ, yet most studies only evaluate TBSA rather than 2(nd) and 3(rd) degree burns separately. We hypothesized that third-degree burns would have a longer LOS than same sized second-degree burns. METHODS: We obtained a list of all patients diagnosed with Second/Third-degree and verified the inclusion of patients meeting the study criteria from July 01, 2011, to July 01, 2021. Afterward, data was manually extracted from electronic health records and separated from patients with inhalation injury. We placed the aggregate findings in a 3D scatter plot to develop a predictive LOS formula. RESULTS: The initial data set (n=678) decreased due to missing burn documentation and exclusion of the inhalation injury group yielding the final data set (n=388). For every one percent second-degree burn increase, the LOS (in days) increases by 0.587 + 0.057 (p= 3.07E-22). For every third-degree burn percent increase, LOS increases by 1.328 + 0.086 (p=1.4E-42). The intercept for the 3D scatter plot was set to 0 as a patient without burns or inhalation injury should have a LOS of 0. The r-squared value is 0.58 which shows a medium level of correlation. Our current equation – LOS = 0.587(2(nd) degree-burn) +1.328(3(rd) degree-burn). CONCLUSIONS: The one day per percent TBSA rule does not accurately predict LOS. Third-degree burn percentage may double the length of stay when compared to second-degree burns. More closely following 2(nd) v. 3(rd) degree burn and other comorbidities will give patients a more accurate estimate of their LOS. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Insurance, physicians, and patients are all affected by LOS. Insurance companies require accurate depictions of LOS to ensure sufficient funding for their patients’ hospital stay. Physicians use LOS to assess course of healing and if other problems are hindering recovery. Furthermore, hospital stay changes a patient’s daily life, work, education, and family. Better predictions for LOS may allow patients to fully grasp what to expect with their recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101852042023-05-16 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay Bandaru, Vishal Youssi, Brandon Morgan, Ryan Nguyen, Kevin Liu, Xiyu Chaudhury, Tristin Gani, Zarif Shaw, Chip Pang, Alan Griswold, John J Burn Care Res C-256 Correlative XII: Clinical Sciences: Critical Care and Disaster Planning INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) is a crucial element to patient care plans, hospital profit, and a patient’s well-being. However, predicting LOS is difficult as burn injuries often have complications. The expectation for LOS in the burn ward is generally one day per percent total body surface area (TBSA) burned. This prediction approximates the average but rarely represents true patient LOS. Healing times for second and third-degree burns differ, yet most studies only evaluate TBSA rather than 2(nd) and 3(rd) degree burns separately. We hypothesized that third-degree burns would have a longer LOS than same sized second-degree burns. METHODS: We obtained a list of all patients diagnosed with Second/Third-degree and verified the inclusion of patients meeting the study criteria from July 01, 2011, to July 01, 2021. Afterward, data was manually extracted from electronic health records and separated from patients with inhalation injury. We placed the aggregate findings in a 3D scatter plot to develop a predictive LOS formula. RESULTS: The initial data set (n=678) decreased due to missing burn documentation and exclusion of the inhalation injury group yielding the final data set (n=388). For every one percent second-degree burn increase, the LOS (in days) increases by 0.587 + 0.057 (p= 3.07E-22). For every third-degree burn percent increase, LOS increases by 1.328 + 0.086 (p=1.4E-42). The intercept for the 3D scatter plot was set to 0 as a patient without burns or inhalation injury should have a LOS of 0. The r-squared value is 0.58 which shows a medium level of correlation. Our current equation – LOS = 0.587(2(nd) degree-burn) +1.328(3(rd) degree-burn). CONCLUSIONS: The one day per percent TBSA rule does not accurately predict LOS. Third-degree burn percentage may double the length of stay when compared to second-degree burns. More closely following 2(nd) v. 3(rd) degree burn and other comorbidities will give patients a more accurate estimate of their LOS. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: Insurance, physicians, and patients are all affected by LOS. Insurance companies require accurate depictions of LOS to ensure sufficient funding for their patients’ hospital stay. Physicians use LOS to assess course of healing and if other problems are hindering recovery. Furthermore, hospital stay changes a patient’s daily life, work, education, and family. Better predictions for LOS may allow patients to fully grasp what to expect with their recovery. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185204/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.062 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C-256 Correlative XII: Clinical Sciences: Critical Care and Disaster Planning
Bandaru, Vishal
Youssi, Brandon
Morgan, Ryan
Nguyen, Kevin
Liu, Xiyu
Chaudhury, Tristin
Gani, Zarif
Shaw, Chip
Pang, Alan
Griswold, John
89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title_full 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title_fullStr 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title_full_unstemmed 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title_short 89 Second-Degree versus Third-Degree Burn Differences in Length of Stay
title_sort 89 second-degree versus third-degree burn differences in length of stay
topic C-256 Correlative XII: Clinical Sciences: Critical Care and Disaster Planning
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185204/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.062
work_keys_str_mv AT bandaruvishal 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT youssibrandon 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT morganryan 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT nguyenkevin 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT liuxiyu 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT chaudhurytristin 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT ganizarif 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT shawchip 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT pangalan 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay
AT griswoldjohn 89seconddegreeversusthirddegreeburndifferencesinlengthofstay