Cargando…

555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center

INTRODUCTION: Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for removal of burn eschar. BBED can be performed at bedside and allows for complete eschar removal with maximal dermal preservation and markedly reduced blood loss. It may also decreas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buta, Martin, Annand, Domenic, Findeisen, Sarah, Hickey, Sean, Sheridan, Robert, Friedstat, Jonathan, Schulz, John, Bojovic, Branko, Goverman, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185212/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.151
_version_ 1785042305355350016
author Buta, Martin
Annand, Domenic
Findeisen, Sarah
Hickey, Sean
Sheridan, Robert
Friedstat, Jonathan
Schulz, John
Bojovic, Branko
Goverman, Jeremy
author_facet Buta, Martin
Annand, Domenic
Findeisen, Sarah
Hickey, Sean
Sheridan, Robert
Friedstat, Jonathan
Schulz, John
Bojovic, Branko
Goverman, Jeremy
author_sort Buta, Martin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for removal of burn eschar. BBED can be performed at bedside and allows for complete eschar removal with maximal dermal preservation and markedly reduced blood loss. It may also decrease the need for autografting or the amount of autograft required. A primary concern with BBED is that it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate analgesia. Experience with BBED in the U.S. has been gained through a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial (DETECT) and an expanded access treatment protocol (NEXT). In this retrospective study, we describe our experience using BBED, with particular focus on pain management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 29 adult burn patients enrolled in the DETECT or NEXT trials who underwent BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds at a major burn center between November 2016 and July 2022. Patient demographics and procedural characteristics, including pain management strategies and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores before, during, and after debridement, were analyzed and described. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 41.2 years (SD=17.8, range 18-72) and an average TBSA of 6.3% (SD=5.6, range 1-24.5) underwent a total of 29 BBED. For pain control during debridement, 6 patients required conscious sedation (CS), 7 a regional block (RB), 5 a local block (LB), and 9 only IV and oral (IVPO) medications. Two patients were intubated and sedated prior to the procedure. No patient required additional BBED treatment and all patients achieved >95% eschar removal. The average NPRS pain score 24 hours before treatment, during treatment, and 24 hours after treatment was 4.0, 4.6, & 4.4, respectively (P=0.65). Sixteen patients (55%) healed without the need for autografting. The average number of days from debridement to wound closure for all patients was 34.9 days (SD=11.9) and for patients who underwent autografting was 40.1 days (SD=12.3). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate analgesia, it is possible to perform BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burns without significant changes in patient-reported pain scores. Prior to debridement, it is critical to establish procedure logistics and reasonable patient expectations. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: The authors review their experience controlling pain associated with BBED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101852122023-05-16 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center Buta, Martin Annand, Domenic Findeisen, Sarah Hickey, Sean Sheridan, Robert Friedstat, Jonathan Schulz, John Bojovic, Branko Goverman, Jeremy J Burn Care Res R-130 Reconstruction INTRODUCTION: Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for removal of burn eschar. BBED can be performed at bedside and allows for complete eschar removal with maximal dermal preservation and markedly reduced blood loss. It may also decrease the need for autografting or the amount of autograft required. A primary concern with BBED is that it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate analgesia. Experience with BBED in the U.S. has been gained through a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial (DETECT) and an expanded access treatment protocol (NEXT). In this retrospective study, we describe our experience using BBED, with particular focus on pain management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 29 adult burn patients enrolled in the DETECT or NEXT trials who underwent BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds at a major burn center between November 2016 and July 2022. Patient demographics and procedural characteristics, including pain management strategies and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores before, during, and after debridement, were analyzed and described. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 41.2 years (SD=17.8, range 18-72) and an average TBSA of 6.3% (SD=5.6, range 1-24.5) underwent a total of 29 BBED. For pain control during debridement, 6 patients required conscious sedation (CS), 7 a regional block (RB), 5 a local block (LB), and 9 only IV and oral (IVPO) medications. Two patients were intubated and sedated prior to the procedure. No patient required additional BBED treatment and all patients achieved >95% eschar removal. The average NPRS pain score 24 hours before treatment, during treatment, and 24 hours after treatment was 4.0, 4.6, & 4.4, respectively (P=0.65). Sixteen patients (55%) healed without the need for autografting. The average number of days from debridement to wound closure for all patients was 34.9 days (SD=11.9) and for patients who underwent autografting was 40.1 days (SD=12.3). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate analgesia, it is possible to perform BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burns without significant changes in patient-reported pain scores. Prior to debridement, it is critical to establish procedure logistics and reasonable patient expectations. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: The authors review their experience controlling pain associated with BBED. Oxford University Press 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185212/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.151 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle R-130 Reconstruction
Buta, Martin
Annand, Domenic
Findeisen, Sarah
Hickey, Sean
Sheridan, Robert
Friedstat, Jonathan
Schulz, John
Bojovic, Branko
Goverman, Jeremy
555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title_full 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title_fullStr 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title_full_unstemmed 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title_short 555 Pain Management During Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
title_sort 555 pain management during bromelain-based enzymatic debridement in a u.s. adult burn center
topic R-130 Reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185212/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad045.151
work_keys_str_mv AT butamartin 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT annanddomenic 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT findeisensarah 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT hickeysean 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT sheridanrobert 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT friedstatjonathan 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT schulzjohn 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT bojovicbranko 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter
AT govermanjeremy 555painmanagementduringbromelainbasedenzymaticdebridementinausadultburncenter