Cargando…

Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories

Previous research demonstrates listeners dynamically adjust phonetic categories in line with lexical context. While listeners show flexibility in adapting speech categories, recalibration may be constrained when variability can be attributed externally. It has been hypothesized that when listeners a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drouin, Julia R., Rojas, Jose A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02715-3
_version_ 1785042342688849920
author Drouin, Julia R.
Rojas, Jose A.
author_facet Drouin, Julia R.
Rojas, Jose A.
author_sort Drouin, Julia R.
collection PubMed
description Previous research demonstrates listeners dynamically adjust phonetic categories in line with lexical context. While listeners show flexibility in adapting speech categories, recalibration may be constrained when variability can be attributed externally. It has been hypothesized that when listeners attribute atypical speech input to a causal factor, phonetic recalibration is attenuated. The current study investigated this theory directly by examining the influence of face masks, an external factor that affects both visual and articulatory cues, on the magnitude of phonetic recalibration. Across four experiments, listeners completed a lexical decision exposure phase in which they heard an ambiguous sound in either /s/-biasing or /ʃ/-biasing lexical contexts, while simultaneously viewing a speaker with a mask off, mask on the chin, or mask over the mouth. Following exposure, all listeners completed an auditory phonetic categorization test along an /ʃ/–/s/ continuum. In Experiment 1 (when no face mask was present during exposure trials), Experiment 2 (when the face mask was on the chin), Experiment 3 (when the face mask was on the mouth during ambiguous items), and Experiment 4 (when the face mask was on the mouth during the entire exposure phase), listeners showed a robust and equivalent phonetic recalibration effect. Recalibration manifested as greater proportion /s/ responses for listeners in the /s/-biased exposure group, relative to listeners in the /ʃ/-biased exposure group. Results support the notion that listeners do not causally attribute face masks with speech idiosyncrasies, which may reflect a general speech learning adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101853752023-05-16 Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories Drouin, Julia R. Rojas, Jose A. Atten Percept Psychophys Article Previous research demonstrates listeners dynamically adjust phonetic categories in line with lexical context. While listeners show flexibility in adapting speech categories, recalibration may be constrained when variability can be attributed externally. It has been hypothesized that when listeners attribute atypical speech input to a causal factor, phonetic recalibration is attenuated. The current study investigated this theory directly by examining the influence of face masks, an external factor that affects both visual and articulatory cues, on the magnitude of phonetic recalibration. Across four experiments, listeners completed a lexical decision exposure phase in which they heard an ambiguous sound in either /s/-biasing or /ʃ/-biasing lexical contexts, while simultaneously viewing a speaker with a mask off, mask on the chin, or mask over the mouth. Following exposure, all listeners completed an auditory phonetic categorization test along an /ʃ/–/s/ continuum. In Experiment 1 (when no face mask was present during exposure trials), Experiment 2 (when the face mask was on the chin), Experiment 3 (when the face mask was on the mouth during ambiguous items), and Experiment 4 (when the face mask was on the mouth during the entire exposure phase), listeners showed a robust and equivalent phonetic recalibration effect. Recalibration manifested as greater proportion /s/ responses for listeners in the /s/-biased exposure group, relative to listeners in the /ʃ/-biased exposure group. Results support the notion that listeners do not causally attribute face masks with speech idiosyncrasies, which may reflect a general speech learning adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Springer US 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10185375/ /pubmed/37188863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02715-3 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Drouin, Julia R.
Rojas, Jose A.
Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title_full Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title_fullStr Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title_full_unstemmed Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title_short Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
title_sort influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02715-3
work_keys_str_mv AT drouinjuliar influenceoffacemasksonrecalibrationofphoneticcategories
AT rojasjosea influenceoffacemasksonrecalibrationofphoneticcategories