Cargando…

Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Sijie, Xie, Shaobing, Tang, Qingping, Zhang, Hua, Xie, Zhihai, Zhang, Junyi, Jiang, Weihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9377518
_version_ 1785042353666392064
author Jiang, Sijie
Xie, Shaobing
Tang, Qingping
Zhang, Hua
Xie, Zhihai
Zhang, Junyi
Jiang, Weihong
author_facet Jiang, Sijie
Xie, Shaobing
Tang, Qingping
Zhang, Hua
Xie, Zhihai
Zhang, Junyi
Jiang, Weihong
author_sort Jiang, Sijie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct electronic searches for clinical trials comparing ILIT and placebo in patients with AR. The final search took place on August 24, 2022. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes included combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), Skin-prick test (SPT), and adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesized as mean difference (MD)/standard mean difference (SMD) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen studies (454 participants) were included in this study. The ILIT group had better clinical improvement on the CSMS (random effects model, SMD-0.85, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.11], P = 0.02) and RQLQ (fixed-effects model, MD-0.42, 95% CI [0.69, 0.15], P = 0.003) than the placebo group. The booster injection was beneficial for CSMS (P < 0.0001), and the 4-week injection interval was superior to the 2-week injection period for improving VAS (P < 0.0001). Local swelling or erythema was the main AE following injection (random effects model, RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005). Discussion. For individuals with AR, ILIT is safe and effective. ILIT alleviates clinical symptoms and reduces pharmaceutical consumption without causing severe AEs. However, the validity of this study is compromised by the substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the included researches. RegistrationCRD42022355329.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101854232023-05-16 Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Jiang, Sijie Xie, Shaobing Tang, Qingping Zhang, Hua Xie, Zhihai Zhang, Junyi Jiang, Weihong Mediators Inflamm Research Article BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct electronic searches for clinical trials comparing ILIT and placebo in patients with AR. The final search took place on August 24, 2022. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes included combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), Skin-prick test (SPT), and adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesized as mean difference (MD)/standard mean difference (SMD) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen studies (454 participants) were included in this study. The ILIT group had better clinical improvement on the CSMS (random effects model, SMD-0.85, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.11], P = 0.02) and RQLQ (fixed-effects model, MD-0.42, 95% CI [0.69, 0.15], P = 0.003) than the placebo group. The booster injection was beneficial for CSMS (P < 0.0001), and the 4-week injection interval was superior to the 2-week injection period for improving VAS (P < 0.0001). Local swelling or erythema was the main AE following injection (random effects model, RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005). Discussion. For individuals with AR, ILIT is safe and effective. ILIT alleviates clinical symptoms and reduces pharmaceutical consumption without causing severe AEs. However, the validity of this study is compromised by the substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the included researches. RegistrationCRD42022355329. Hindawi 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10185423/ /pubmed/37197570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9377518 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sijie Jiang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiang, Sijie
Xie, Shaobing
Tang, Qingping
Zhang, Hua
Xie, Zhihai
Zhang, Junyi
Jiang, Weihong
Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of intralymphatic immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9377518
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangsijie evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xieshaobing evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangqingping evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghua evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiezhihai evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjunyi evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangweihong evaluationofintralymphaticimmunotherapyinallergicrhinitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis