Cargando…
Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks
Simultaneous sensing of metabolic analytes such as pH and O(2) is critical in complex and heterogeneous biological environments where analytes often are interrelated. However, measuring all target analytes at the same time and position is often challenging. A major challenge preventing further progr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04678-8 |
_version_ | 1785042385189732352 |
---|---|
author | Zieger, Silvia E. Koren, Klaus |
author_facet | Zieger, Silvia E. Koren, Klaus |
author_sort | Zieger, Silvia E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Simultaneous sensing of metabolic analytes such as pH and O(2) is critical in complex and heterogeneous biological environments where analytes often are interrelated. However, measuring all target analytes at the same time and position is often challenging. A major challenge preventing further progress occurs when sensor signals cannot be directly correlated to analyte concentrations due to additional effects, overshadowing and complicating the actual correlations. In fields related to optical sensing, machine learning has already shown its potential to overcome these challenges by solving nested and multidimensional correlations. Hence, we want to apply machine learning models to fluorescence-based optical chemical sensors to facilitate simultaneous imaging of multiple analytes in 2D. We present a proof-of-concept approach for simultaneous imaging of pH and dissolved O(2) using an optical chemical sensor, a hyperspectral camera for image acquisition, and a multi-layered machine learning model based on a decision tree algorithm (XGBoost) for data analysis. Our model predicts dissolved O(2) and pH with a mean absolute error of < 4.50·10(−2) and < 1.96·10(−1), respectively, and a root mean square error of < 2.12·10(−1) and < 4.42·10(−1), respectively. Besides the model-building process, we discuss the potentials of machine learning for optical chemical sensing, especially regarding multi-analyte imaging, and highlight risks of bias that can arise in machine learning-based data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-023-04678-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10185573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101855732023-05-17 Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks Zieger, Silvia E. Koren, Klaus Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Simultaneous sensing of metabolic analytes such as pH and O(2) is critical in complex and heterogeneous biological environments where analytes often are interrelated. However, measuring all target analytes at the same time and position is often challenging. A major challenge preventing further progress occurs when sensor signals cannot be directly correlated to analyte concentrations due to additional effects, overshadowing and complicating the actual correlations. In fields related to optical sensing, machine learning has already shown its potential to overcome these challenges by solving nested and multidimensional correlations. Hence, we want to apply machine learning models to fluorescence-based optical chemical sensors to facilitate simultaneous imaging of multiple analytes in 2D. We present a proof-of-concept approach for simultaneous imaging of pH and dissolved O(2) using an optical chemical sensor, a hyperspectral camera for image acquisition, and a multi-layered machine learning model based on a decision tree algorithm (XGBoost) for data analysis. Our model predicts dissolved O(2) and pH with a mean absolute error of < 4.50·10(−2) and < 1.96·10(−1), respectively, and a root mean square error of < 2.12·10(−1) and < 4.42·10(−1), respectively. Besides the model-building process, we discuss the potentials of machine learning for optical chemical sensing, especially regarding multi-analyte imaging, and highlight risks of bias that can arise in machine learning-based data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-023-04678-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10185573/ /pubmed/37071140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04678-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Zieger, Silvia E. Koren, Klaus Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title | Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title_full | Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title_fullStr | Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title_short | Machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: Why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
title_sort | machine learning for optical chemical multi-analyte imaging: why we should dare and why it’s not without risks |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04678-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziegersilviae machinelearningforopticalchemicalmultianalyteimagingwhyweshoulddareandwhyitsnotwithoutrisks AT korenklaus machinelearningforopticalchemicalmultianalyteimagingwhyweshoulddareandwhyitsnotwithoutrisks |