Cargando…

Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology

INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Nathanael C., Cocks, Margaret, Brintz, Ben J., Stoff, Benjamin, Cipriano, Sarah D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205272
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314
_version_ 1785042413375455232
author Jensen, Nathanael C.
Cocks, Margaret
Brintz, Ben J.
Stoff, Benjamin
Cipriano, Sarah D.
author_facet Jensen, Nathanael C.
Cocks, Margaret
Brintz, Ben J.
Stoff, Benjamin
Cipriano, Sarah D.
author_sort Jensen, Nathanael C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access to help provide ethics education. METHODS: We held an hour-long, faculty-facilitated, interactive, virtual discussion about ethical issues in dermatopathology. The session followed a structured, case-based format. We administered anonymous online feedback surveys after the session and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare participants’ before and after responses. RESULTS: Seventy-two individuals from two academic institutions participated in the session. We collected 35 total responses (49%) from dermatology residents (n = 15), dermatology faculty (n = 14), medical students (n = 2), and other providers and learners (n = 4). Feedback was largely positive, with 21 attendees (60%) indicating they learned a few things and 11 (31%) indicating they learned a great deal. Additionally, 32 participants (91%) indicated they would recommend the session to a colleague. Our analysis showed that attendees had a greater self-perceived level of achievement for each of our three objectives after the session. DISCUSSION: This dermatoethics session is structured so as to be easily shared, deployed, and built on by other institutions. We hope that other institutions will use our materials and results to improve upon the foundation presented here and that this framework will be used by other medical specialties seeking to foster ethics education in their training programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101857012023-05-17 Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology Jensen, Nathanael C. Cocks, Margaret Brintz, Ben J. Stoff, Benjamin Cipriano, Sarah D. MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access to help provide ethics education. METHODS: We held an hour-long, faculty-facilitated, interactive, virtual discussion about ethical issues in dermatopathology. The session followed a structured, case-based format. We administered anonymous online feedback surveys after the session and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare participants’ before and after responses. RESULTS: Seventy-two individuals from two academic institutions participated in the session. We collected 35 total responses (49%) from dermatology residents (n = 15), dermatology faculty (n = 14), medical students (n = 2), and other providers and learners (n = 4). Feedback was largely positive, with 21 attendees (60%) indicating they learned a few things and 11 (31%) indicating they learned a great deal. Additionally, 32 participants (91%) indicated they would recommend the session to a colleague. Our analysis showed that attendees had a greater self-perceived level of achievement for each of our three objectives after the session. DISCUSSION: This dermatoethics session is structured so as to be easily shared, deployed, and built on by other institutions. We hope that other institutions will use our materials and results to improve upon the foundation presented here and that this framework will be used by other medical specialties seeking to foster ethics education in their training programs. Association of American Medical Colleges 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10185701/ /pubmed/37205272 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314 Text en © 2023 Jensen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license.
spellingShingle Original Publication
Jensen, Nathanael C.
Cocks, Margaret
Brintz, Ben J.
Stoff, Benjamin
Cipriano, Sarah D.
Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title_full Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title_fullStr Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title_full_unstemmed Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title_short Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
title_sort structured case-based ethics discussion for trainees and faculty on dermatopathology
topic Original Publication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205272
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314
work_keys_str_mv AT jensennathanaelc structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology
AT cocksmargaret structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology
AT brintzbenj structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology
AT stoffbenjamin structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology
AT ciprianosarahd structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology