Cargando…
Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology
INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association of American Medical Colleges
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205272 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314 |
_version_ | 1785042413375455232 |
---|---|
author | Jensen, Nathanael C. Cocks, Margaret Brintz, Ben J. Stoff, Benjamin Cipriano, Sarah D. |
author_facet | Jensen, Nathanael C. Cocks, Margaret Brintz, Ben J. Stoff, Benjamin Cipriano, Sarah D. |
author_sort | Jensen, Nathanael C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access to help provide ethics education. METHODS: We held an hour-long, faculty-facilitated, interactive, virtual discussion about ethical issues in dermatopathology. The session followed a structured, case-based format. We administered anonymous online feedback surveys after the session and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare participants’ before and after responses. RESULTS: Seventy-two individuals from two academic institutions participated in the session. We collected 35 total responses (49%) from dermatology residents (n = 15), dermatology faculty (n = 14), medical students (n = 2), and other providers and learners (n = 4). Feedback was largely positive, with 21 attendees (60%) indicating they learned a few things and 11 (31%) indicating they learned a great deal. Additionally, 32 participants (91%) indicated they would recommend the session to a colleague. Our analysis showed that attendees had a greater self-perceived level of achievement for each of our three objectives after the session. DISCUSSION: This dermatoethics session is structured so as to be easily shared, deployed, and built on by other institutions. We hope that other institutions will use our materials and results to improve upon the foundation presented here and that this framework will be used by other medical specialties seeking to foster ethics education in their training programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10185701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Association of American Medical Colleges |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101857012023-05-17 Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology Jensen, Nathanael C. Cocks, Margaret Brintz, Ben J. Stoff, Benjamin Cipriano, Sarah D. MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: Ethical and professional dilemmas are part of the day-to-day practice of medicine, including within dermatopathology (e.g., ethical implications of self-referring skin biopsies for pathology interpretation). There is a need for teaching aids that dermatology educators can easily access to help provide ethics education. METHODS: We held an hour-long, faculty-facilitated, interactive, virtual discussion about ethical issues in dermatopathology. The session followed a structured, case-based format. We administered anonymous online feedback surveys after the session and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare participants’ before and after responses. RESULTS: Seventy-two individuals from two academic institutions participated in the session. We collected 35 total responses (49%) from dermatology residents (n = 15), dermatology faculty (n = 14), medical students (n = 2), and other providers and learners (n = 4). Feedback was largely positive, with 21 attendees (60%) indicating they learned a few things and 11 (31%) indicating they learned a great deal. Additionally, 32 participants (91%) indicated they would recommend the session to a colleague. Our analysis showed that attendees had a greater self-perceived level of achievement for each of our three objectives after the session. DISCUSSION: This dermatoethics session is structured so as to be easily shared, deployed, and built on by other institutions. We hope that other institutions will use our materials and results to improve upon the foundation presented here and that this framework will be used by other medical specialties seeking to foster ethics education in their training programs. Association of American Medical Colleges 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10185701/ /pubmed/37205272 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314 Text en © 2023 Jensen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license. |
spellingShingle | Original Publication Jensen, Nathanael C. Cocks, Margaret Brintz, Ben J. Stoff, Benjamin Cipriano, Sarah D. Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title | Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title_full | Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title_fullStr | Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title_short | Structured Case-Based Ethics Discussion for Trainees and Faculty on Dermatopathology |
title_sort | structured case-based ethics discussion for trainees and faculty on dermatopathology |
topic | Original Publication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205272 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensennathanaelc structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology AT cocksmargaret structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology AT brintzbenj structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology AT stoffbenjamin structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology AT ciprianosarahd structuredcasebasedethicsdiscussionfortraineesandfacultyondermatopathology |