Cargando…

Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke

Previous studies indicated that spatial neglect is characterized by widespread alteration of resting-state functional connectivity and changes in the functional topology of large-scale brain systems. However, whether such network modulations exhibit temporal fluctuations related to spatial neglect i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadone, Sara, de Pasquale, Francesco, Digiovanni, Anna, Grande, Eleonora, Pavone, Luigi, Sensi, Stefano L., Committeri, Giorgia, Baldassarre, Antonello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1163147
_version_ 1785042436897112064
author Spadone, Sara
de Pasquale, Francesco
Digiovanni, Anna
Grande, Eleonora
Pavone, Luigi
Sensi, Stefano L.
Committeri, Giorgia
Baldassarre, Antonello
author_facet Spadone, Sara
de Pasquale, Francesco
Digiovanni, Anna
Grande, Eleonora
Pavone, Luigi
Sensi, Stefano L.
Committeri, Giorgia
Baldassarre, Antonello
author_sort Spadone, Sara
collection PubMed
description Previous studies indicated that spatial neglect is characterized by widespread alteration of resting-state functional connectivity and changes in the functional topology of large-scale brain systems. However, whether such network modulations exhibit temporal fluctuations related to spatial neglect is still largely unknown. This study investigated the association between brain states and spatial neglect after the onset of focal brain lesions. A cohort of right-hemisphere stroke patients (n = 20) underwent neuropsychological assessment of neglect as well as structural and resting-state functional MRI sessions within 2 weeks from stroke onset. Brain states were identified using dynamic functional connectivity as estimated by the sliding window approach followed by clustering of seven resting state networks. The networks included visual, dorsal attention, sensorimotor, cingulo-opercular, language, fronto-parietal, and default mode networks. The analyses on the whole cohort of patients, i.e., with and without neglect, identified two distinct brain states characterized by different degrees of brain modularity and system segregation. Compared to non-neglect patients, neglect subjects spent more time in less modular and segregated state characterized by weak intra-network coupling and sparse inter-network interactions. By contrast, patients without neglect dwelt mainly in more modular and segregated states, which displayed robust intra-network connectivity and anti-correlations among task-positive and task-negative systems. Notably, correlational analyses indicated that patients exhibiting more severe neglect spent more time and dwelt more often in the state featuring low brain modularity and system segregation and vice versa. Furthermore, separate analyses on neglect vs. non-neglect patients yielded two distinct brain states for each sub-cohort. A state featuring widespread strong connections within and between networks and low modularity and system segregation was detected only in the neglect group. Such a connectivity profile blurred the distinction among functional systems. Finally, a state exhibiting a clear separation among modules with strong positive intra-network and negative inter-network connectivity was found only in the non-neglect group. Overall, our results indicate that stroke yielding spatial attention deficits affects the time-varying properties of functional interactions among large-scale networks. These findings provide further insights into the pathophysiology of spatial neglect and its treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101858062023-05-17 Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke Spadone, Sara de Pasquale, Francesco Digiovanni, Anna Grande, Eleonora Pavone, Luigi Sensi, Stefano L. Committeri, Giorgia Baldassarre, Antonello Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Previous studies indicated that spatial neglect is characterized by widespread alteration of resting-state functional connectivity and changes in the functional topology of large-scale brain systems. However, whether such network modulations exhibit temporal fluctuations related to spatial neglect is still largely unknown. This study investigated the association between brain states and spatial neglect after the onset of focal brain lesions. A cohort of right-hemisphere stroke patients (n = 20) underwent neuropsychological assessment of neglect as well as structural and resting-state functional MRI sessions within 2 weeks from stroke onset. Brain states were identified using dynamic functional connectivity as estimated by the sliding window approach followed by clustering of seven resting state networks. The networks included visual, dorsal attention, sensorimotor, cingulo-opercular, language, fronto-parietal, and default mode networks. The analyses on the whole cohort of patients, i.e., with and without neglect, identified two distinct brain states characterized by different degrees of brain modularity and system segregation. Compared to non-neglect patients, neglect subjects spent more time in less modular and segregated state characterized by weak intra-network coupling and sparse inter-network interactions. By contrast, patients without neglect dwelt mainly in more modular and segregated states, which displayed robust intra-network connectivity and anti-correlations among task-positive and task-negative systems. Notably, correlational analyses indicated that patients exhibiting more severe neglect spent more time and dwelt more often in the state featuring low brain modularity and system segregation and vice versa. Furthermore, separate analyses on neglect vs. non-neglect patients yielded two distinct brain states for each sub-cohort. A state featuring widespread strong connections within and between networks and low modularity and system segregation was detected only in the neglect group. Such a connectivity profile blurred the distinction among functional systems. Finally, a state exhibiting a clear separation among modules with strong positive intra-network and negative inter-network connectivity was found only in the non-neglect group. Overall, our results indicate that stroke yielding spatial attention deficits affects the time-varying properties of functional interactions among large-scale networks. These findings provide further insights into the pathophysiology of spatial neglect and its treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10185806/ /pubmed/37205053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1163147 Text en Copyright © 2023 Spadone, de Pasquale, Digiovanni, Grande, Pavone, Sensi, Committeri and Baldassarre. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Spadone, Sara
de Pasquale, Francesco
Digiovanni, Anna
Grande, Eleonora
Pavone, Luigi
Sensi, Stefano L.
Committeri, Giorgia
Baldassarre, Antonello
Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title_full Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title_fullStr Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title_short Dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
title_sort dynamic brain states in spatial neglect after stroke
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1163147
work_keys_str_mv AT spadonesara dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT depasqualefrancesco dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT digiovannianna dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT grandeeleonora dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT pavoneluigi dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT sensistefanol dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT committerigiorgia dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke
AT baldassarreantonello dynamicbrainstatesinspatialneglectafterstroke