Cargando…
Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil
INTRODUCTION: Abortion attitudes are influenced by people’s socioeconomic and demographic circumstances and can be volatile during times of crisis. Brazil is an interesting case for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, high income inequa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00813-3 |
_version_ | 1785042467910844416 |
---|---|
author | Whitfield, Brooke Marteleto, Leticia |
author_facet | Whitfield, Brooke Marteleto, Leticia |
author_sort | Whitfield, Brooke |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Abortion attitudes are influenced by people’s socioeconomic and demographic circumstances and can be volatile during times of crisis. Brazil is an interesting case for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, high income inequality, and extreme uncertainty generated by the back-to-back Zika and COVID-19 crises. This study seeks to assess Brazilian women’s attitudes toward abortion and whether religion and income explain these attitudes in the context of novel infectious disease epidemics. METHODS: We used data from a population-based sample of 3996 women ages 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (May–September 2020). We conducted paired t-tests and multivariate-adjusted logistic regression models with adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess differences in support for abortion in the case of fetal congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), maternal Zika infection during pregnancy, and maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. RESULTS: Significantly more women support the right to abortion in the case of fetal CZS (50%) than in the case of maternal Zika infection (40%) and maternal COVID-19 infection (31%). Support for abortion varies by income and religion. Controlling for other demographic characteristics, high-income women have higher odds of supporting abortion in the case of fetal CZS (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.25–2.94) and maternal Zika infection (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.33–3.21) than low-income women. Evangelical women have lower odds of supporting abortion in the case of maternal Zika infection (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45–0.93) and marginally lower odds of supporting the right to abortion in the case of maternal COVID-19 infection (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47–1.00) than women of other religious affiliations. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: With increasingly conservative religious groups gaining size in Brazil, we expect to see increasing abortion restrictions. However, this research finds that a sizable portion of women across all incomes and religious affiliations support abortion, particularly in the case of fetal anomalies associated with Zika. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10185939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101859392023-05-17 Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil Whitfield, Brooke Marteleto, Leticia Sex Res Social Policy Article INTRODUCTION: Abortion attitudes are influenced by people’s socioeconomic and demographic circumstances and can be volatile during times of crisis. Brazil is an interesting case for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, high income inequality, and extreme uncertainty generated by the back-to-back Zika and COVID-19 crises. This study seeks to assess Brazilian women’s attitudes toward abortion and whether religion and income explain these attitudes in the context of novel infectious disease epidemics. METHODS: We used data from a population-based sample of 3996 women ages 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (May–September 2020). We conducted paired t-tests and multivariate-adjusted logistic regression models with adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess differences in support for abortion in the case of fetal congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), maternal Zika infection during pregnancy, and maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. RESULTS: Significantly more women support the right to abortion in the case of fetal CZS (50%) than in the case of maternal Zika infection (40%) and maternal COVID-19 infection (31%). Support for abortion varies by income and religion. Controlling for other demographic characteristics, high-income women have higher odds of supporting abortion in the case of fetal CZS (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.25–2.94) and maternal Zika infection (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.33–3.21) than low-income women. Evangelical women have lower odds of supporting abortion in the case of maternal Zika infection (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45–0.93) and marginally lower odds of supporting the right to abortion in the case of maternal COVID-19 infection (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47–1.00) than women of other religious affiliations. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: With increasingly conservative religious groups gaining size in Brazil, we expect to see increasing abortion restrictions. However, this research finds that a sizable portion of women across all incomes and religious affiliations support abortion, particularly in the case of fetal anomalies associated with Zika. Springer US 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10185939/ /pubmed/37363355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00813-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Whitfield, Brooke Marteleto, Leticia Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title | Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title_full | Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title_fullStr | Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title_short | Women’s Attitudes Towards Abortion in Response to the Zika and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Brazil |
title_sort | women’s attitudes towards abortion in response to the zika and covid-19 outbreaks in brazil |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00813-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitfieldbrooke womensattitudestowardsabortioninresponsetothezikaandcovid19outbreaksinbrazil AT marteletoleticia womensattitudestowardsabortioninresponsetothezikaandcovid19outbreaksinbrazil |