Cargando…
Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Random...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9 |
_version_ | 1785042469888458752 |
---|---|
author | Hoedl, Manuela Osmancevic, Selvedina Thonhofer, Nina Reiter, Lea Schoberer, Daniela |
author_facet | Hoedl, Manuela Osmancevic, Selvedina Thonhofer, Nina Reiter, Lea Schoberer, Daniela |
author_sort | Hoedl, Manuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10185947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101859472023-05-17 Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis Hoedl, Manuela Osmancevic, Selvedina Thonhofer, Nina Reiter, Lea Schoberer, Daniela Wien Med Wochenschr Review This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10185947/ /pubmed/37191933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Hoedl, Manuela Osmancevic, Selvedina Thonhofer, Nina Reiter, Lea Schoberer, Daniela Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title | Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the covid-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoedlmanuela psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis AT osmancevicselvedina psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis AT thonhofernina psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis AT reiterlea psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis AT schobererdaniela psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis |