Cargando…

Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis

This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoedl, Manuela, Osmancevic, Selvedina, Thonhofer, Nina, Reiter, Lea, Schoberer, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9
_version_ 1785042469888458752
author Hoedl, Manuela
Osmancevic, Selvedina
Thonhofer, Nina
Reiter, Lea
Schoberer, Daniela
author_facet Hoedl, Manuela
Osmancevic, Selvedina
Thonhofer, Nina
Reiter, Lea
Schoberer, Daniela
author_sort Hoedl, Manuela
collection PubMed
description This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10185947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101859472023-05-17 Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis Hoedl, Manuela Osmancevic, Selvedina Thonhofer, Nina Reiter, Lea Schoberer, Daniela Wien Med Wochenschr Review This rapid review was conducted by following a predefined protocol developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. A total of 172 potential reviews and 167 primary studies of interest were found. AMSTAR II was used to assess the quality of the included reviews and the JBI Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials for primary studies. Overall, four studies were included in this review. The study quality ranged from 5 to 12 out of 13 possible stars. No robust evidence was found that psychosocial interventions can reduce psychological distress. No significant effect could be found regarding post-traumatic stress. Two studies on anxiety were identified, one which showed an effect and another which did not. The psychosocial intervention had no beneficial effect on burnout and depression, whereas providing a mindfulness- or relaxation-based intervention resulted in a significant improvement in sleep quality. By considering the secondary results and results of previous reviews, a combination of training and mindfulness seems to be beneficial for decreasing anxiety and stress in home care workers. In summary, the evidence-based recommendations are still limited and, therefore, more evidence is needed to make a general statement of high certainty about the effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10185947/ /pubmed/37191933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Hoedl, Manuela
Osmancevic, Selvedina
Thonhofer, Nina
Reiter, Lea
Schoberer, Daniela
Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychosocial interventions for healthcare workers during the covid-19 pandemic: rapid review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01013-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hoedlmanuela psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis
AT osmancevicselvedina psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thonhofernina psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reiterlea psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schobererdaniela psychosocialinterventionsforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicrapidreviewandmetaanalysis