Reliability of Ahmed glaucoma valve surgical videos for educational purposes

PURPOSE: The use of video-based social media platforms is increasing among trainee residents, fellows, and practicing ophthalmologists. In this study, we objectively evaluate the quality of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation videos on open access, video-based internet platforms. DESIGN: Internet-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 23 websites publishing medical surgery training video content were queried using the keyword “Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation”. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The descriptive statistics of video parameters were noted, and the videos were assessed using established scoring systems—Sandvik, Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HON code), mDISCERN, and Global Quality Score (GQS) scores. Video Quality Score (VQS) was determined based on the 14 steps per the AGV implantation rubric. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen videos were evaluated, and 35 were excluded. The total quality of all 84 videos according to their Sandvik, HON Code, GQS, DISCERN, and VQS scores was 11.79 ± 1.70 (excellent quality), 6.86 ± 0.75 (excellent quality), 3.97 ± 0.93 (good quality), 3.26 ± 0.66 (fair quality) and 11.45 ± 2.67 (good quality), respectively. No significant correlation was found between the descriptive parameters and video quality score. However, no significant correlation was found between the descriptive parameters and video quality score. CONCLUSIONS: The objective analysis showed that the video quality ranged from good to excellent. AGV implantation videos were sparse on exclusive ophthalmology surgical video portals. Therefore, more peer-reviewed videos following standardized rubric are needed on open-access surgical video platforms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-023-02734-x.