Cargando…

Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm

This Scientific Opinion concerns the welfare of Domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus), Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domesticus) and their hybrids (Mule ducks), Domestic geese (Anser anser f. domesticus) and Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in relation to the rearing of breeders, birds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis, Schmidt, Christian Gortázar, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Padalino, Barbara, Roberts, Helen Clare, Spoolder, Hans, Stahl, Karl, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, Berg, Charlotte, Edwards, Sandra, Knierim, Ute, Riber, Anja, Salamon, Attila, Tiemann, Inga, Fabris, Chiara, Manakidou, Aikaterini, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Van der Stede, Yves, Vitali, Marika, Velarde, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200855
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7992
_version_ 1785042493911334912
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Schmidt, Christian Gortázar
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Berg, Charlotte
Edwards, Sandra
Knierim, Ute
Riber, Anja
Salamon, Attila
Tiemann, Inga
Fabris, Chiara
Manakidou, Aikaterini
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Velarde, Antonio
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Schmidt, Christian Gortázar
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Berg, Charlotte
Edwards, Sandra
Knierim, Ute
Riber, Anja
Salamon, Attila
Tiemann, Inga
Fabris, Chiara
Manakidou, Aikaterini
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Velarde, Antonio
collection PubMed
description This Scientific Opinion concerns the welfare of Domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus), Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domesticus) and their hybrids (Mule ducks), Domestic geese (Anser anser f. domesticus) and Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in relation to the rearing of breeders, birds for meat, Muscovy and Mule ducks and Domestic geese for foie gras and layer Japanese quail for egg production. The most common husbandry systems (HSs) in the European Union are described for each animal species and category. The following welfare consequences are described and assessed for each species: restriction of movement, injuries (bone lesions including fractures and dislocations, soft tissue lesions and integument damage and locomotory disorders including lameness), group stress, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour and inability to express maternal behaviour (related to prelaying and nesting behaviours). Animal‐based measures relevant for the assessment of these welfare consequences were identified and described. The relevant hazards leading to the welfare consequences in the different HSs were identified. Specific factors such as space allowance (including minimum enclosure area and height) per bird, group size, floor quality, characteristics of nesting facilities and enrichment provided (including access to water to fulfil biological needs) were assessed in relation to the welfare consequences and, recommendations on how to prevent the welfare consequences were provided in a quantitative or qualitative way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101860702023-05-17 Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Schmidt, Christian Gortázar Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Berg, Charlotte Edwards, Sandra Knierim, Ute Riber, Anja Salamon, Attila Tiemann, Inga Fabris, Chiara Manakidou, Aikaterini Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Velarde, Antonio EFSA J Scientific Opinion This Scientific Opinion concerns the welfare of Domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus), Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domesticus) and their hybrids (Mule ducks), Domestic geese (Anser anser f. domesticus) and Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in relation to the rearing of breeders, birds for meat, Muscovy and Mule ducks and Domestic geese for foie gras and layer Japanese quail for egg production. The most common husbandry systems (HSs) in the European Union are described for each animal species and category. The following welfare consequences are described and assessed for each species: restriction of movement, injuries (bone lesions including fractures and dislocations, soft tissue lesions and integument damage and locomotory disorders including lameness), group stress, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour and inability to express maternal behaviour (related to prelaying and nesting behaviours). Animal‐based measures relevant for the assessment of these welfare consequences were identified and described. The relevant hazards leading to the welfare consequences in the different HSs were identified. Specific factors such as space allowance (including minimum enclosure area and height) per bird, group size, floor quality, characteristics of nesting facilities and enrichment provided (including access to water to fulfil biological needs) were assessed in relation to the welfare consequences and, recommendations on how to prevent the welfare consequences were provided in a quantitative or qualitative way. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10186070/ /pubmed/37200855 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7992 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Schmidt, Christian Gortázar
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Berg, Charlotte
Edwards, Sandra
Knierim, Ute
Riber, Anja
Salamon, Attila
Tiemann, Inga
Fabris, Chiara
Manakidou, Aikaterini
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Velarde, Antonio
Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title_full Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title_fullStr Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title_full_unstemmed Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title_short Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
title_sort welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200855
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7992
work_keys_str_mv AT welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT nielsensørensaxmose welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT alvarezjulio welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT calistripaolo welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT canalielisabetta welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT drewejulianashley welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT garinbastujibruno welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT schmidtchristiangortazar welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT herskinmette welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT michelvirginie welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT padalinobarbara welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT robertshelenclare welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT spoolderhans welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT stahlkarl welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT viltroparvo welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT wincklerchristoph welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT bergcharlotte welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT edwardssandra welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT knierimute welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT riberanja welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT salamonattila welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT tiemanninga welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT fabrischiara welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT manakidouaikaterini welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT mosbachschulzolaf welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT vanderstedeyves welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT vitalimarika welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm
AT velardeantonio welfareofducksgeeseandquailonfarm