Cargando…
Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104 |
_version_ | 1785042551644880896 |
---|---|
author | Minckas, Nicole Kharel, Rashmi Ryan-Coker, Marcella Lincetto, Ornella Tunçalp, Özge Sacks, Emma Muzigaba, Moise Portela, Anayda |
author_facet | Minckas, Nicole Kharel, Rashmi Ryan-Coker, Marcella Lincetto, Ornella Tunçalp, Özge Sacks, Emma Muzigaba, Moise Portela, Anayda |
author_sort | Minckas, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and measures to assess experience of and satisfaction with the care of the newborn. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures and tools of experience (physiological or indirect) and satisfaction with newborn care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2010 through 1 December 2022 and contacted professional networks. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on the studies and the tools’ characteristics. We mapped the tools and measures against the WHO quality of care frameworks to identify the most frequent measured domains of care and to highlight existing gaps. RESULT: We identified 18 292 records of which 72 were eligible. An innovative finding of this review is the inclusion of newborn perspectives through behavioural responses, physiological signals, pain profiles as well as other non-verbal cues as markers of newborn experience. Domains related to parental participation and decision-making, ensuring continuity of care and receiving coordinated care, were the most measured across the included tools. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive and validated instruments measuring all aspects of care are needed. Developing a robust theoretical ground will be fundamental to the design and utilisation of standardised tools and measures. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: This review was registered and published on protocol.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvk7n4zn). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10186411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101864112023-05-17 Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures Minckas, Nicole Kharel, Rashmi Ryan-Coker, Marcella Lincetto, Ornella Tunçalp, Özge Sacks, Emma Muzigaba, Moise Portela, Anayda BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and measures to assess experience of and satisfaction with the care of the newborn. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures and tools of experience (physiological or indirect) and satisfaction with newborn care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2010 through 1 December 2022 and contacted professional networks. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on the studies and the tools’ characteristics. We mapped the tools and measures against the WHO quality of care frameworks to identify the most frequent measured domains of care and to highlight existing gaps. RESULT: We identified 18 292 records of which 72 were eligible. An innovative finding of this review is the inclusion of newborn perspectives through behavioural responses, physiological signals, pain profiles as well as other non-verbal cues as markers of newborn experience. Domains related to parental participation and decision-making, ensuring continuity of care and receiving coordinated care, were the most measured across the included tools. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive and validated instruments measuring all aspects of care are needed. Developing a robust theoretical ground will be fundamental to the design and utilisation of standardised tools and measures. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: This review was registered and published on protocol.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvk7n4zn). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10186411/ /pubmed/37160360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Minckas, Nicole Kharel, Rashmi Ryan-Coker, Marcella Lincetto, Ornella Tunçalp, Özge Sacks, Emma Muzigaba, Moise Portela, Anayda Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title | Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title_full | Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title_fullStr | Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title_short | Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
title_sort | measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minckasnicole measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT kharelrashmi measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT ryancokermarcella measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT lincettoornella measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT tuncalpozge measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT sacksemma measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT muzigabamoise measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures AT portelaanayda measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures |