Cargando…

Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures

BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minckas, Nicole, Kharel, Rashmi, Ryan-Coker, Marcella, Lincetto, Ornella, Tunçalp, Özge, Sacks, Emma, Muzigaba, Moise, Portela, Anayda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104
_version_ 1785042551644880896
author Minckas, Nicole
Kharel, Rashmi
Ryan-Coker, Marcella
Lincetto, Ornella
Tunçalp, Özge
Sacks, Emma
Muzigaba, Moise
Portela, Anayda
author_facet Minckas, Nicole
Kharel, Rashmi
Ryan-Coker, Marcella
Lincetto, Ornella
Tunçalp, Özge
Sacks, Emma
Muzigaba, Moise
Portela, Anayda
author_sort Minckas, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and measures to assess experience of and satisfaction with the care of the newborn. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures and tools of experience (physiological or indirect) and satisfaction with newborn care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2010 through 1 December 2022 and contacted professional networks. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on the studies and the tools’ characteristics. We mapped the tools and measures against the WHO quality of care frameworks to identify the most frequent measured domains of care and to highlight existing gaps. RESULT: We identified 18 292 records of which 72 were eligible. An innovative finding of this review is the inclusion of newborn perspectives through behavioural responses, physiological signals, pain profiles as well as other non-verbal cues as markers of newborn experience. Domains related to parental participation and decision-making, ensuring continuity of care and receiving coordinated care, were the most measured across the included tools. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive and validated instruments measuring all aspects of care are needed. Developing a robust theoretical ground will be fundamental to the design and utilisation of standardised tools and measures. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: This review was registered and published on protocol.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvk7n4zn).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101864112023-05-17 Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures Minckas, Nicole Kharel, Rashmi Ryan-Coker, Marcella Lincetto, Ornella Tunçalp, Özge Sacks, Emma Muzigaba, Moise Portela, Anayda BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and measures to assess experience of and satisfaction with the care of the newborn. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures and tools of experience (physiological or indirect) and satisfaction with newborn care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2010 through 1 December 2022 and contacted professional networks. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on the studies and the tools’ characteristics. We mapped the tools and measures against the WHO quality of care frameworks to identify the most frequent measured domains of care and to highlight existing gaps. RESULT: We identified 18 292 records of which 72 were eligible. An innovative finding of this review is the inclusion of newborn perspectives through behavioural responses, physiological signals, pain profiles as well as other non-verbal cues as markers of newborn experience. Domains related to parental participation and decision-making, ensuring continuity of care and receiving coordinated care, were the most measured across the included tools. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive and validated instruments measuring all aspects of care are needed. Developing a robust theoretical ground will be fundamental to the design and utilisation of standardised tools and measures. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: This review was registered and published on protocol.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvk7n4zn). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10186411/ /pubmed/37160360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
spellingShingle Original Research
Minckas, Nicole
Kharel, Rashmi
Ryan-Coker, Marcella
Lincetto, Ornella
Tunçalp, Özge
Sacks, Emma
Muzigaba, Moise
Portela, Anayda
Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title_full Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title_fullStr Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title_full_unstemmed Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title_short Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
title_sort measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104
work_keys_str_mv AT minckasnicole measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT kharelrashmi measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT ryancokermarcella measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT lincettoornella measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT tuncalpozge measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT sacksemma measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT muzigabamoise measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures
AT portelaanayda measuringexperienceofandsatisfactionwithnewborncareascopingreviewoftoolsandmeasures