Cargando…

Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of clinical study report (CSR) documents published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and for included pivotal trials, to quantify the timeliness of access to trial results from CSRs compared with conventional published sources. DESIGN: Cross-sectiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Byrne, David, Prendergast, Ciaran, Fahey, Tom, Moriarty, Frank
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:	Evidence Based Practice
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068981

Ejemplares similares

The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Douet, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Consideration of sex and gender in European clinical practice guidelines in internal medicine: a systematic review protocol
por: Naghipour, Awa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey
por: Lafuente-Lafuente, Carmelo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Novel approach to meta-analysis of tests and clinical prediction rules with three or more risk categories
por: Ebell, Mark H, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Diagnosing malignant melanoma in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical prediction rules
por: Harrington, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Use of antimicrobial dressings in England and the association with published clinical guidance: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hussey, Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses
por: Garcia-Alamino, Josep M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review
por: Sobieraj, Diana M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quantifying patient preferences for symptomatic breast clinic referral: a decision analysis study
por: Quinlan, Aisling, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities
por: Bachelet, Vivienne C, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A systematic review of the effect of red blood cell transfusion on mortality: evidence from large-scale observational studies published between 2006 and 2010
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers
por: Gopalakrishna, Gowri, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Is traditional Chinese medicine recommended in Western medicine clinical practice guidelines in China? A systematic analysis
por: Ren, Jun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing the appropriateness of prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in Australia: a cross-sectional study
por: Hibbert, Peter D, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
por: Downes, Martin J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Publication status of completed registered studies in paediatric appendicitis: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Breil, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome reporting from clinical trials of non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with traditional Chinese medicine or Western medicine: a systematic review
por: Qiu, Ruijin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Health facility structure and maternal characteristics related to essential newborn care in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
por: Menezes, Maria Alexsandra Silva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Coproduction in commissioning decisions: is there an association with decision satisfaction for commissioners working in the NHS? A cross-sectional survey 2010/2011
por: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Healthcare professionals’ behavior, skills, knowledge and attitudes on evidence-based health practice: a protocol of cross-sectional study
por: Mariano, Arielly Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Adaptation of the DEMQOL-Proxy for routine use in care homes: a cross-sectional study of the reliability and validity of DEMQOL-CH
por: Hughes, Laura J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review
por: Fujita, Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Access to medicines in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): a scoping study
por: Emmerick, Isabel Cristina Martins, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on the prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension: a cross-sectional analysis of 10 799 individuals
por: Alyabsi, Mesnad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Off-label indications of aspirin in gynaecology and obstetrics outpatients at two Chinese tertiary care hospitals: a retrospective cross-sectional study
por: Shen, Sijie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evidence into practice: protocol for a new mixed-methods approach to explore the relationship between trials evidence and clinical practice through systematic identification and analysis of articles citing randomised controlled trials
por: Byrne, Benjamin E, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why is there variation in the practice of evidence-based medicine in primary care? A qualitative study
por: Hisham, Ranita, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Clinical application of oral Chinese Patent Medicines in ophthalmology: a scoping review protocol
por: Xu, Kai, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Identifying the top research priorities in medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES): a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
por: van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
por: Elia, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study
por: Zuñiga-Hernandez, Jorge Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evidence-based practice utilisation and its associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals in West Shoa zone, central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
por: Megersa, Yohanis, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
por: Cho, Yongil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Randomised controlled pragmatic clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a discharge follow-up phone call on 30-day hospital readmissions: balancing pragmatic and explanatory design considerations
por: Yiadom, Maame Yaa A B, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in courses for doctors in training: a scoping review
por: Simons, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Answering medical questions at the point of care: a cross-sectional study comparing rapid decisions based on PubMed and Epistemonikos searches with evidence-based recommendations developed with the GRADE approach
por: Izcovich, Ariel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_oaq2d7crdie5k1u3357kammbin