Cargando…

Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors. SETTING: The quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011–2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatakeyama, Yosuke, Seto, Kanako, Onishi, Ryo, Hirata, Koki, Matsumoto, Kunichika, Wu, Yinghui, Hasegawa, Tomonori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639
_version_ 1785042565871960064
author Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Seto, Kanako
Onishi, Ryo
Hirata, Koki
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Wu, Yinghui
Hasegawa, Tomonori
author_facet Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Seto, Kanako
Onishi, Ryo
Hirata, Koki
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Wu, Yinghui
Hasegawa, Tomonori
author_sort Hatakeyama, Yosuke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors. SETTING: The quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011–2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A questionnaire survey targeting CPG development groups was conducted through postal mail. PARTICIPANTS: 405 CPGs were retrieved from a Japanese CPG clearinghouse. Questionnaires were distributed to the 405 CPG development groups. Of the 178 respondents, 22 were excluded because of missing values. Finally, 156 participants representing their CPG development groups were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: CPG quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. The characteristics of CPGs, including publication year, development organisation, versions, number of members in the development group and involvement of methodological experts, were corrected from the description in the CPGs and the questionnaire survey. We performed multiple logistic regressions using the quality of CPGs as the dependent variable and the involvement of experts as the independent variable, adjusting for other possible factors. RESULTS: A total of 156 CPGs were included. Expert involvement was significantly associated with the AGREE II instrument scores in domains 1 (β=0.207), 2 (β=0.370), 3 (β=0.413), 4 (β=0.289), 5 (β=0.375), 6 (β=0.240) and overall (β=0.344). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the involvement of methodological experts in the CPG development process improves the quality of CPGs. The results suggest the importance of establishing a training and certification programme for experts and constructing expert referral systems that meet CPG developers’ needs to improve the quality of CPGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101864732023-05-17 Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan Hatakeyama, Yosuke Seto, Kanako Onishi, Ryo Hirata, Koki Matsumoto, Kunichika Wu, Yinghui Hasegawa, Tomonori BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors. SETTING: The quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011–2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A questionnaire survey targeting CPG development groups was conducted through postal mail. PARTICIPANTS: 405 CPGs were retrieved from a Japanese CPG clearinghouse. Questionnaires were distributed to the 405 CPG development groups. Of the 178 respondents, 22 were excluded because of missing values. Finally, 156 participants representing their CPG development groups were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: CPG quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. The characteristics of CPGs, including publication year, development organisation, versions, number of members in the development group and involvement of methodological experts, were corrected from the description in the CPGs and the questionnaire survey. We performed multiple logistic regressions using the quality of CPGs as the dependent variable and the involvement of experts as the independent variable, adjusting for other possible factors. RESULTS: A total of 156 CPGs were included. Expert involvement was significantly associated with the AGREE II instrument scores in domains 1 (β=0.207), 2 (β=0.370), 3 (β=0.413), 4 (β=0.289), 5 (β=0.375), 6 (β=0.240) and overall (β=0.344). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the involvement of methodological experts in the CPG development process improves the quality of CPGs. The results suggest the importance of establishing a training and certification programme for experts and constructing expert referral systems that meet CPG developers’ needs to improve the quality of CPGs. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10186473/ /pubmed/37188477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Seto, Kanako
Onishi, Ryo
Hirata, Koki
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Wu, Yinghui
Hasegawa, Tomonori
Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title_full Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title_fullStr Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title_short Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan
title_sort involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in japan
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639
work_keys_str_mv AT hatakeyamayosuke involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT setokanako involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT onishiryo involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT hiratakoki involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT matsumotokunichika involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT wuyinghui involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan
AT hasegawatomonori involvementofmethodologicalexpertsandthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesacriticalappraisalofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandaquestionnairesurveyofthedevelopmentgroupsinjapan