Cargando…
A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075 |
_version_ | 1785042569396224000 |
---|---|
author | Wikström, Maria B Åström, Jens Stene Hurtsén, Anna Hörer, Tal M Nilsson, Kristofer F |
author_facet | Wikström, Maria B Åström, Jens Stene Hurtsén, Anna Hörer, Tal M Nilsson, Kristofer F |
author_sort | Wikström, Maria B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide the placement of REBOA in the absence of fluoroscopy. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound could be used to adequately visualize the suprahepatic vena cava and guide REBOVC positioning, without significant time-delay, when compared with fluoroscopic guidance, and compared with the corresponding REBOA placement. METHODS: Nine anesthetized pigs were used to compare ultrasound-guided placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC with corresponding fluoroscopic guidance, in terms of correct placement and speed. Accuracy was controlled by fluoroscopy. Four intervention groups: (1) fluoroscopy REBOA, (2) fluoroscopy REBOVC, (3) ultrasound REBOA and (4) ultrasound REBOVC. The aim was to carry out the four interventions in all animals. Randomization was performed to either fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance being used first. The time required to position the balloons in the supraceliac aorta or in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava was recorded and compared between the four intervention groups. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided REBOA and REBOVC placement was completed in eight animals, respectively. All eight had correctly positioned REBOA and REBOVC on fluoroscopic verification. Fluoroscopy-guided REBOA placement was slightly faster (median 14 s, IQR 13–17 s) than ultrasound-guided REBOA (median 22 s, IQR 21–25 s, p=0.024). The corresponding comparisons of the REBOVC groups were not statistically significant, with fluoroscopy-guided REBOVC taking 19 s, median (IQR 11–22 s) and ultrasound-guided REBOVC taking 28 s, median (IQR 20–34 s, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound adequately and quickly guide the placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC in a porcine laboratory model, however, safety issues must be considered before use in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, experimental, animal study. Basic science study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10186488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101864882023-05-17 A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) Wikström, Maria B Åström, Jens Stene Hurtsén, Anna Hörer, Tal M Nilsson, Kristofer F Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide the placement of REBOA in the absence of fluoroscopy. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound could be used to adequately visualize the suprahepatic vena cava and guide REBOVC positioning, without significant time-delay, when compared with fluoroscopic guidance, and compared with the corresponding REBOA placement. METHODS: Nine anesthetized pigs were used to compare ultrasound-guided placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC with corresponding fluoroscopic guidance, in terms of correct placement and speed. Accuracy was controlled by fluoroscopy. Four intervention groups: (1) fluoroscopy REBOA, (2) fluoroscopy REBOVC, (3) ultrasound REBOA and (4) ultrasound REBOVC. The aim was to carry out the four interventions in all animals. Randomization was performed to either fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance being used first. The time required to position the balloons in the supraceliac aorta or in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava was recorded and compared between the four intervention groups. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided REBOA and REBOVC placement was completed in eight animals, respectively. All eight had correctly positioned REBOA and REBOVC on fluoroscopic verification. Fluoroscopy-guided REBOA placement was slightly faster (median 14 s, IQR 13–17 s) than ultrasound-guided REBOA (median 22 s, IQR 21–25 s, p=0.024). The corresponding comparisons of the REBOVC groups were not statistically significant, with fluoroscopy-guided REBOVC taking 19 s, median (IQR 11–22 s) and ultrasound-guided REBOVC taking 28 s, median (IQR 20–34 s, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound adequately and quickly guide the placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC in a porcine laboratory model, however, safety issues must be considered before use in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, experimental, animal study. Basic science study. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10186488/ /pubmed/37205275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wikström, Maria B Åström, Jens Stene Hurtsén, Anna Hörer, Tal M Nilsson, Kristofer F A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title | A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title_full | A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title_fullStr | A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title_full_unstemmed | A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title_short | A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) |
title_sort | porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (rebovc) and the aorta (reboa) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wikstrommariab aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT astromjens aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT stenehurtsenanna aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT horertalm aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT nilssonkristoferf aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT wikstrommariab porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT astromjens porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT stenehurtsenanna porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT horertalm porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa AT nilssonkristoferf porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa |