Cargando…

A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)

OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wikström, Maria B, Åström, Jens, Stene Hurtsén, Anna, Hörer, Tal M, Nilsson, Kristofer F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075
_version_ 1785042569396224000
author Wikström, Maria B
Åström, Jens
Stene Hurtsén, Anna
Hörer, Tal M
Nilsson, Kristofer F
author_facet Wikström, Maria B
Åström, Jens
Stene Hurtsén, Anna
Hörer, Tal M
Nilsson, Kristofer F
author_sort Wikström, Maria B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide the placement of REBOA in the absence of fluoroscopy. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound could be used to adequately visualize the suprahepatic vena cava and guide REBOVC positioning, without significant time-delay, when compared with fluoroscopic guidance, and compared with the corresponding REBOA placement. METHODS: Nine anesthetized pigs were used to compare ultrasound-guided placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC with corresponding fluoroscopic guidance, in terms of correct placement and speed. Accuracy was controlled by fluoroscopy. Four intervention groups: (1) fluoroscopy REBOA, (2) fluoroscopy REBOVC, (3) ultrasound REBOA and (4) ultrasound REBOVC. The aim was to carry out the four interventions in all animals. Randomization was performed to either fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance being used first. The time required to position the balloons in the supraceliac aorta or in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava was recorded and compared between the four intervention groups. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided REBOA and REBOVC placement was completed in eight animals, respectively. All eight had correctly positioned REBOA and REBOVC on fluoroscopic verification. Fluoroscopy-guided REBOA placement was slightly faster (median 14 s, IQR 13–17 s) than ultrasound-guided REBOA (median 22 s, IQR 21–25 s, p=0.024). The corresponding comparisons of the REBOVC groups were not statistically significant, with fluoroscopy-guided REBOVC taking 19 s, median (IQR 11–22 s) and ultrasound-guided REBOVC taking 28 s, median (IQR 20–34 s, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound adequately and quickly guide the placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC in a porcine laboratory model, however, safety issues must be considered before use in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, experimental, animal study. Basic science study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101864882023-05-17 A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA) Wikström, Maria B Åström, Jens Stene Hurtsén, Anna Hörer, Tal M Nilsson, Kristofer F Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-free settings, alternative safe and quick methods for placing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) are needed. Ultrasound is being increasingly used to guide the placement of REBOA in the absence of fluoroscopy. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound could be used to adequately visualize the suprahepatic vena cava and guide REBOVC positioning, without significant time-delay, when compared with fluoroscopic guidance, and compared with the corresponding REBOA placement. METHODS: Nine anesthetized pigs were used to compare ultrasound-guided placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC with corresponding fluoroscopic guidance, in terms of correct placement and speed. Accuracy was controlled by fluoroscopy. Four intervention groups: (1) fluoroscopy REBOA, (2) fluoroscopy REBOVC, (3) ultrasound REBOA and (4) ultrasound REBOVC. The aim was to carry out the four interventions in all animals. Randomization was performed to either fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance being used first. The time required to position the balloons in the supraceliac aorta or in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava was recorded and compared between the four intervention groups. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided REBOA and REBOVC placement was completed in eight animals, respectively. All eight had correctly positioned REBOA and REBOVC on fluoroscopic verification. Fluoroscopy-guided REBOA placement was slightly faster (median 14 s, IQR 13–17 s) than ultrasound-guided REBOA (median 22 s, IQR 21–25 s, p=0.024). The corresponding comparisons of the REBOVC groups were not statistically significant, with fluoroscopy-guided REBOVC taking 19 s, median (IQR 11–22 s) and ultrasound-guided REBOVC taking 28 s, median (IQR 20–34 s, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound adequately and quickly guide the placement of supraceliac REBOA and suprahepatic REBOVC in a porcine laboratory model, however, safety issues must be considered before use in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, experimental, animal study. Basic science study. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10186488/ /pubmed/37205275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Wikström, Maria B
Åström, Jens
Stene Hurtsén, Anna
Hörer, Tal M
Nilsson, Kristofer F
A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title_full A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title_fullStr A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title_full_unstemmed A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title_short A porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (REBOVC) and the aorta (REBOA)
title_sort porcine study of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of endovascular balloons in the inferior vena cava (rebovc) and the aorta (reboa)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001075
work_keys_str_mv AT wikstrommariab aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT astromjens aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT stenehurtsenanna aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT horertalm aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT nilssonkristoferf aporcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT wikstrommariab porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT astromjens porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT stenehurtsenanna porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT horertalm porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa
AT nilssonkristoferf porcinestudyofultrasoundguidedversusfluoroscopyguidedplacementofendovascularballoonsintheinferiorvenacavarebovcandtheaortareboa