Cargando…

Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhilan, Ma, Chunyan, Luo, Yanbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201077
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-211
_version_ 1785042580797390848
author Zhang, Zhilan
Ma, Chunyan
Luo, Yanbing
author_facet Zhang, Zhilan
Ma, Chunyan
Luo, Yanbing
author_sort Zhang, Zhilan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. RESULTS: Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I(2)>50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56–0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51–120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93–1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77–7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P>0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101865362023-05-17 Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Zhilan Ma, Chunyan Luo, Yanbing J Gastrointest Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. RESULTS: Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I(2)>50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56–0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51–120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93–1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77–7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P>0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value. AME Publishing Company 2023-04-24 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10186536/ /pubmed/37201077 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-211 Text en 2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Zhilan
Ma, Chunyan
Luo, Yanbing
Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201077
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-211
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhilan diagnosticvalueoflivercontrastenhancedultrasoundinearlyhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT machunyan diagnosticvalueoflivercontrastenhancedultrasoundinearlyhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luoyanbing diagnosticvalueoflivercontrastenhancedultrasoundinearlyhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis