Cargando…
Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Peristomal wound infection is a common complication in patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The main reason for peristomal infection might be the oral microbes coating the gastrostomy tube during implantation. Povidone-iodine solution can be applied for skin and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w |
_version_ | 1785042605996769280 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yu-Jen Hou, Ming-Chih Yang, Tsung-Chieh Lee, Pei-Chang Wang, Yen-Po Huang, Yi-Hsiang Lee, Fa-Yauh |
author_facet | Chen, Yu-Jen Hou, Ming-Chih Yang, Tsung-Chieh Lee, Pei-Chang Wang, Yen-Po Huang, Yi-Hsiang Lee, Fa-Yauh |
author_sort | Chen, Yu-Jen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Peristomal wound infection is a common complication in patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The main reason for peristomal infection might be the oral microbes coating the gastrostomy tube during implantation. Povidone-iodine solution can be applied for skin and oral decontamination. We designed a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a Betadine® (povidone-iodine) coated gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized to Betadine and control groups (25 patients in each group) from April 2014 to August 2021 at a tertiary medical center. All patients received the pull method for PEG implantation using a 24-french gastrostomy tube. The primary endpoint was peristomal wound infection rate 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Changes in Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) and C-Reative protein (Delta CRP) at 24 h after PEG were higher in the control group than in the Betadine group (N/L ratio, 3.1 vs. 1.2, p = 0.047; CRP, 2.68 vs.1.16, p = 0.009). The two groups did not differ in post-PEG fever, peristomal infection, pneumonia, or all-cause infection. Delta CRP could predict peristomal infection and all-cause infection within 2 weeks (AUROC 0.712 vs. 0.748; p = 0.039 vs. 0.008). The best cut-off-point of Delta CRP for the diagnosis of peristomal wound infection was 3 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The betadine coating gastrostomy tube method could not reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CRP elevation of less than 3 mg/dl may be used to exclude the potential peristomal wound infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04249570 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04249570). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10186665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101866652023-05-17 Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial Chen, Yu-Jen Hou, Ming-Chih Yang, Tsung-Chieh Lee, Pei-Chang Wang, Yen-Po Huang, Yi-Hsiang Lee, Fa-Yauh BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Peristomal wound infection is a common complication in patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The main reason for peristomal infection might be the oral microbes coating the gastrostomy tube during implantation. Povidone-iodine solution can be applied for skin and oral decontamination. We designed a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a Betadine® (povidone-iodine) coated gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized to Betadine and control groups (25 patients in each group) from April 2014 to August 2021 at a tertiary medical center. All patients received the pull method for PEG implantation using a 24-french gastrostomy tube. The primary endpoint was peristomal wound infection rate 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Changes in Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) and C-Reative protein (Delta CRP) at 24 h after PEG were higher in the control group than in the Betadine group (N/L ratio, 3.1 vs. 1.2, p = 0.047; CRP, 2.68 vs.1.16, p = 0.009). The two groups did not differ in post-PEG fever, peristomal infection, pneumonia, or all-cause infection. Delta CRP could predict peristomal infection and all-cause infection within 2 weeks (AUROC 0.712 vs. 0.748; p = 0.039 vs. 0.008). The best cut-off-point of Delta CRP for the diagnosis of peristomal wound infection was 3 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The betadine coating gastrostomy tube method could not reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CRP elevation of less than 3 mg/dl may be used to exclude the potential peristomal wound infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04249570 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04249570). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w. BioMed Central 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10186665/ /pubmed/37189057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Yu-Jen Hou, Ming-Chih Yang, Tsung-Chieh Lee, Pei-Chang Wang, Yen-Po Huang, Yi-Hsiang Lee, Fa-Yauh Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyujen effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT houmingchih effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yangtsungchieh effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leepeichang effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangyenpo effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangyihsiang effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leefayauh effectivenessofbetadinecoatinggastrostomytubetoreduceperistomalinfectionafterpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial |