Cargando…

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in total gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol including early oral intake and omitting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement after total gastrectomy. METHODS: We analyzed 182 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshikawa, Kozo, Shimada, Mitsuo, Tokunaga, Takuya, Nakao, Toshihiro, Nishi, Masaaki, Takasu, Chie, Kashihara, Hideya, Wada, Yuma, Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03034-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol including early oral intake and omitting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement after total gastrectomy. METHODS: We analyzed 182 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy. The clinical pathway was changed in 2015, and patients were divided into 2 groups (conventional group and modified group). Postoperative complications, bowel movement, and postoperative hospital stays were compared in the two groups in all cases and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Flatus and defecation were significantly earlier in the modified group compared with those in the conventional group (flatus: 2 (1–5) days vs 3 (2–12) days, p = 0.03; defecation: 4 (1–14) days vs 6 (2–12) days p = 0.04). The postoperative hospital stay was 18 (6–90) days in the conventional group and 14 (7–74) days in the modified group (p = 0.009). Days until discharge criteria were met were earlier in the modified group compared with that in the conventional group (10 (7–69) days vs 14 (6–84) days p = 0.01). Overall and severe complications occurred in nine patients (12.6%) and three patients (4.2%) in the conventional group and twelve patients (10.8%) and four patients (3.6%) in the modified group, respectively (p = 0.70 and p = 0.83) in all cases. In PSM, there is no significant difference between the two groups concerning the postoperative complications (overall complication 6 (12.5%) vs 8 (16.7%) p = 0.56, severe complications 1 (2%) vs 2 (4.2%) p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Modified ERAS for total gastrectomy may be feasible and safe.