Cargando…

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.

Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salehi, Zahra, Amirahmadi, Atefe, Rezaei, Arezou, Farrokh, Parisa, Ghasemian, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201033
http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798
_version_ 1785042637262159872
author Salehi, Zahra
Amirahmadi, Atefe
Rezaei, Arezou
Farrokh, Parisa
Ghasemian, Javad
author_facet Salehi, Zahra
Amirahmadi, Atefe
Rezaei, Arezou
Farrokh, Parisa
Ghasemian, Javad
author_sort Salehi, Zahra
collection PubMed
description Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs P. harmala, T. ramosissima, and P. reptans. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the trnL-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of P. harmala, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the trnL-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast trnL-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of T. ramosissima and P. reptans. The chloroplast trnL-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Shiraz University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101868582023-05-17 Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. Salehi, Zahra Amirahmadi, Atefe Rezaei, Arezou Farrokh, Parisa Ghasemian, Javad Mol Biol Res Commun Original Article Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs P. harmala, T. ramosissima, and P. reptans. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the trnL-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of P. harmala, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the trnL-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast trnL-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of T. ramosissima and P. reptans. The chloroplast trnL-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method. Shiraz University 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10186858/ /pubmed/37201033 http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Salehi, Zahra
Amirahmadi, Atefe
Rezaei, Arezou
Farrokh, Parisa
Ghasemian, Javad
Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title_full Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title_fullStr Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title_short Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
title_sort comparison of five dna extraction methods in three medicinal plants: peganum harmala l., tamarix ramosissima ledeb., and potentilla reptans l.
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201033
http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798
work_keys_str_mv AT salehizahra comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl
AT amirahmadiatefe comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl
AT rezaeiarezou comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl
AT farrokhparisa comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl
AT ghasemianjavad comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl