Cargando…
Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shiraz University
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201033 http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798 |
_version_ | 1785042637262159872 |
---|---|
author | Salehi, Zahra Amirahmadi, Atefe Rezaei, Arezou Farrokh, Parisa Ghasemian, Javad |
author_facet | Salehi, Zahra Amirahmadi, Atefe Rezaei, Arezou Farrokh, Parisa Ghasemian, Javad |
author_sort | Salehi, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs P. harmala, T. ramosissima, and P. reptans. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the trnL-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of P. harmala, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the trnL-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast trnL-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of T. ramosissima and P. reptans. The chloroplast trnL-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10186858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Shiraz University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101868582023-05-17 Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. Salehi, Zahra Amirahmadi, Atefe Rezaei, Arezou Farrokh, Parisa Ghasemian, Javad Mol Biol Res Commun Original Article Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs P. harmala, T. ramosissima, and P. reptans. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the trnL-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of P. harmala, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the trnL-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast trnL-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of T. ramosissima and P. reptans. The chloroplast trnL-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method. Shiraz University 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10186858/ /pubmed/37201033 http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Salehi, Zahra Amirahmadi, Atefe Rezaei, Arezou Farrokh, Parisa Ghasemian, Javad Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title | Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title_full | Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title_fullStr | Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title_short | Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L. |
title_sort | comparison of five dna extraction methods in three medicinal plants: peganum harmala l., tamarix ramosissima ledeb., and potentilla reptans l. |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201033 http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salehizahra comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl AT amirahmadiatefe comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl AT rezaeiarezou comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl AT farrokhparisa comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl AT ghasemianjavad comparisonoffivednaextractionmethodsinthreemedicinalplantspeganumharmalaltamarixramosissimaledebandpotentillareptansl |