Cargando…

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19

INTRO: The unavailability of specific treatment for COVID-19 prompted the empirical use of remdesivir, a viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Since evidences present conflicting results, this study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of adjunctive remdesivir administration vs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viray, D.D., Cajulao, T.P., Demot, B., Bartolo, S., Feliciano, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186882/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.352
_version_ 1785042641833951232
author Viray, D.D.
Cajulao, T.P.
Demot, B.
Bartolo, S.
Feliciano, D.
author_facet Viray, D.D.
Cajulao, T.P.
Demot, B.
Bartolo, S.
Feliciano, D.
author_sort Viray, D.D.
collection PubMed
description INTRO: The unavailability of specific treatment for COVID-19 prompted the empirical use of remdesivir, a viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Since evidences present conflicting results, this study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of adjunctive remdesivir administration vs standard of care (non-remdesivir) in COVID-19 adult patients in a tertiary hospital in Baguio City, Philippines. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of severe to critical COVID-19 patients admitted from September 2020 to September 2021. Stratified random sampling was employed and data collection was through chart review. Analysis was done with R Statistical Software version 4, utilizing paired T-test and McNemar test, with p-value of <0.05 considered as significant. FINDINGS: A total of 318 patients were reviewed and classified into the remdesivir (n=159) and standard of care (non-remdesivir) (n=159) groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for co-morbidities (p<0.05). There were no noted significant differences between both groups in terms of morality (p=0.885) and reduction in chest radiograph infiltrates (p=0.182). However, the average number of days to clinical improvement (7 days vs 12 days) and recovery (16 days vs 21 days) were statistically lesser in the remdesivir group (p=0.00). Also, those who experienced diarrhea (p=0.33) and transaminitis (p=0.003) were significantly higher in those given remdesivir. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of mortality in those given remdesivir vs standard of care alone. Nevertheless, remdesivir administration is associated with significantly faster time to clinical improvement and recovery. The drug is thought to facilitate faster lung viral load clearance and improved pulmonary function through inhibition of RNA polymerase. Though not potentially life-threatening, the drug may cause diarrhea and elevation in transaminases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101868822023-05-16 CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19 Viray, D.D. Cajulao, T.P. Demot, B. Bartolo, S. Feliciano, D. Int J Infect Dis Article INTRO: The unavailability of specific treatment for COVID-19 prompted the empirical use of remdesivir, a viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Since evidences present conflicting results, this study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of adjunctive remdesivir administration vs standard of care (non-remdesivir) in COVID-19 adult patients in a tertiary hospital in Baguio City, Philippines. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of severe to critical COVID-19 patients admitted from September 2020 to September 2021. Stratified random sampling was employed and data collection was through chart review. Analysis was done with R Statistical Software version 4, utilizing paired T-test and McNemar test, with p-value of <0.05 considered as significant. FINDINGS: A total of 318 patients were reviewed and classified into the remdesivir (n=159) and standard of care (non-remdesivir) (n=159) groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for co-morbidities (p<0.05). There were no noted significant differences between both groups in terms of morality (p=0.885) and reduction in chest radiograph infiltrates (p=0.182). However, the average number of days to clinical improvement (7 days vs 12 days) and recovery (16 days vs 21 days) were statistically lesser in the remdesivir group (p=0.00). Also, those who experienced diarrhea (p=0.33) and transaminitis (p=0.003) were significantly higher in those given remdesivir. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of mortality in those given remdesivir vs standard of care alone. Nevertheless, remdesivir administration is associated with significantly faster time to clinical improvement and recovery. The drug is thought to facilitate faster lung viral load clearance and improved pulmonary function through inhibition of RNA polymerase. Though not potentially life-threatening, the drug may cause diarrhea and elevation in transaminases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-05 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10186882/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.352 Text en Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Viray, D.D.
Cajulao, T.P.
Demot, B.
Bartolo, S.
Feliciano, D.
CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title_full CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title_fullStr CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title_short CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ADVERSE EVENTS OF ADJUNCTIVE REMDESIVIR ADMINISTRATION VS STANDARD OF CARE IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19
title_sort clinical effectiveness and adverse events of adjunctive remdesivir administration vs standard of care in adults with severe and critical covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186882/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.352
work_keys_str_mv AT viraydd clinicaleffectivenessandadverseeventsofadjunctiveremdesiviradministrationvsstandardofcareinadultswithsevereandcriticalcovid19
AT cajulaotp clinicaleffectivenessandadverseeventsofadjunctiveremdesiviradministrationvsstandardofcareinadultswithsevereandcriticalcovid19
AT demotb clinicaleffectivenessandadverseeventsofadjunctiveremdesiviradministrationvsstandardofcareinadultswithsevereandcriticalcovid19
AT bartolos clinicaleffectivenessandadverseeventsofadjunctiveremdesiviradministrationvsstandardofcareinadultswithsevereandcriticalcovid19
AT felicianod clinicaleffectivenessandadverseeventsofadjunctiveremdesiviradministrationvsstandardofcareinadultswithsevereandcriticalcovid19