Cargando…
A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279 |
_version_ | 1785042659467853824 |
---|---|
author | Batty, M. Prestedge, J. Chan, H.T. Soloczynskyj, K. Tran, T. Chibo, D. D'Costa, J. Caly, L. Saville, M. Hawkes, D. Williamson, D. |
author_facet | Batty, M. Prestedge, J. Chan, H.T. Soloczynskyj, K. Tran, T. Chibo, D. D'Costa, J. Caly, L. Saville, M. Hawkes, D. Williamson, D. |
author_sort | Batty, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public for RATs, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of self-collected samples using commercial NAAT for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Consenting participants aged 14 years and older were provided with a self-collection pack containing instructions and either a FLOQSwab (Copan) or a Rhinoswab (Rhinomed). Participants collected their own nasal sample unsupervised prior to having a HCW-collected combined nose and throat swab taken for standard of care NAAT. Paired self-collected and HCW samples were tested on the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) and the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay (Hologic). FINDINGS: We demonstrated comparable sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between self-collected nasal and Rhinoswab samples, compared to HCW- collected samples tested using the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assays. In our study the clinical performance of self-collected specimens was comparable to HCW-collected samples, with both self-collect nasal and Rhinoswab samples resulting in 90-95% sensitivity, and in most cases >95% specificity. DISCUSSION: Without the availability of samples for NAAT the ability to perform genomic testing is limited, reducing surveillance and public health investigations. We showed that genomic sequencing from self-collected samples can correctly identify the virus lineage and that the main determination of successful genomic testing is a high viral load rather than collection method. CONCLUSION: These data support self-collection as an accessible method for community testing for COVID-19 and introduces a novel collection device, the Rhinoswab as an alternative to the standard nasal swab. The testing method of self-collection can be expanded from the widely used RATs to NAAT and genomic testing which may inform the management and public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10186957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101869572023-05-16 A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 Batty, M. Prestedge, J. Chan, H.T. Soloczynskyj, K. Tran, T. Chibo, D. D'Costa, J. Caly, L. Saville, M. Hawkes, D. Williamson, D. Int J Infect Dis Article INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public for RATs, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of self-collected samples using commercial NAAT for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Consenting participants aged 14 years and older were provided with a self-collection pack containing instructions and either a FLOQSwab (Copan) or a Rhinoswab (Rhinomed). Participants collected their own nasal sample unsupervised prior to having a HCW-collected combined nose and throat swab taken for standard of care NAAT. Paired self-collected and HCW samples were tested on the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) and the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay (Hologic). FINDINGS: We demonstrated comparable sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between self-collected nasal and Rhinoswab samples, compared to HCW- collected samples tested using the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assays. In our study the clinical performance of self-collected specimens was comparable to HCW-collected samples, with both self-collect nasal and Rhinoswab samples resulting in 90-95% sensitivity, and in most cases >95% specificity. DISCUSSION: Without the availability of samples for NAAT the ability to perform genomic testing is limited, reducing surveillance and public health investigations. We showed that genomic sequencing from self-collected samples can correctly identify the virus lineage and that the main determination of successful genomic testing is a high viral load rather than collection method. CONCLUSION: These data support self-collection as an accessible method for community testing for COVID-19 and introduces a novel collection device, the Rhinoswab as an alternative to the standard nasal swab. The testing method of self-collection can be expanded from the widely used RATs to NAAT and genomic testing which may inform the management and public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-05 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10186957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279 Text en Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Batty, M. Prestedge, J. Chan, H.T. Soloczynskyj, K. Tran, T. Chibo, D. D'Costa, J. Caly, L. Saville, M. Hawkes, D. Williamson, D. A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title | A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title_full | A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title_fullStr | A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title_short | A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 |
title_sort | laboratory validation of self-collected nasal swab and rhinoswab for the detection of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battym alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT prestedgej alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT chanht alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT soloczynskyjk alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT trant alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT chibod alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT dcostaj alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT calyl alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT savillem alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT hawkesd alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT williamsond alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT battym laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT prestedgej laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT chanht laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT soloczynskyjk laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT trant laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT chibod laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT dcostaj laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT calyl laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT savillem laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT hawkesd laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 AT williamsond laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2 |