Cargando…

A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2

INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batty, M., Prestedge, J., Chan, H.T., Soloczynskyj, K., Tran, T., Chibo, D., D'Costa, J., Caly, L., Saville, M., Hawkes, D., Williamson, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186957/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279
_version_ 1785042659467853824
author Batty, M.
Prestedge, J.
Chan, H.T.
Soloczynskyj, K.
Tran, T.
Chibo, D.
D'Costa, J.
Caly, L.
Saville, M.
Hawkes, D.
Williamson, D.
author_facet Batty, M.
Prestedge, J.
Chan, H.T.
Soloczynskyj, K.
Tran, T.
Chibo, D.
D'Costa, J.
Caly, L.
Saville, M.
Hawkes, D.
Williamson, D.
author_sort Batty, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public for RATs, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of self-collected samples using commercial NAAT for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Consenting participants aged 14 years and older were provided with a self-collection pack containing instructions and either a FLOQSwab (Copan) or a Rhinoswab (Rhinomed). Participants collected their own nasal sample unsupervised prior to having a HCW-collected combined nose and throat swab taken for standard of care NAAT. Paired self-collected and HCW samples were tested on the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) and the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay (Hologic). FINDINGS: We demonstrated comparable sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between self-collected nasal and Rhinoswab samples, compared to HCW- collected samples tested using the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assays. In our study the clinical performance of self-collected specimens was comparable to HCW-collected samples, with both self-collect nasal and Rhinoswab samples resulting in 90-95% sensitivity, and in most cases >95% specificity. DISCUSSION: Without the availability of samples for NAAT the ability to perform genomic testing is limited, reducing surveillance and public health investigations. We showed that genomic sequencing from self-collected samples can correctly identify the virus lineage and that the main determination of successful genomic testing is a high viral load rather than collection method. CONCLUSION: These data support self-collection as an accessible method for community testing for COVID-19 and introduces a novel collection device, the Rhinoswab as an alternative to the standard nasal swab. The testing method of self-collection can be expanded from the widely used RATs to NAAT and genomic testing which may inform the management and public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101869572023-05-16 A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 Batty, M. Prestedge, J. Chan, H.T. Soloczynskyj, K. Tran, T. Chibo, D. D'Costa, J. Caly, L. Saville, M. Hawkes, D. Williamson, D. Int J Infect Dis Article INTRO: In Australia, the main methods to diagnose COVID-19 are through rapid antigen tests (RATs) and through nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT, including polymerase chain reaction) on healthcare worker (HCW)-collected combined nose/throat swabs. With self-collection widely used by the public for RATs, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of self-collected samples using commercial NAAT for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Consenting participants aged 14 years and older were provided with a self-collection pack containing instructions and either a FLOQSwab (Copan) or a Rhinoswab (Rhinomed). Participants collected their own nasal sample unsupervised prior to having a HCW-collected combined nose and throat swab taken for standard of care NAAT. Paired self-collected and HCW samples were tested on the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) and the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay (Hologic). FINDINGS: We demonstrated comparable sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between self-collected nasal and Rhinoswab samples, compared to HCW- collected samples tested using the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assays. In our study the clinical performance of self-collected specimens was comparable to HCW-collected samples, with both self-collect nasal and Rhinoswab samples resulting in 90-95% sensitivity, and in most cases >95% specificity. DISCUSSION: Without the availability of samples for NAAT the ability to perform genomic testing is limited, reducing surveillance and public health investigations. We showed that genomic sequencing from self-collected samples can correctly identify the virus lineage and that the main determination of successful genomic testing is a high viral load rather than collection method. CONCLUSION: These data support self-collection as an accessible method for community testing for COVID-19 and introduces a novel collection device, the Rhinoswab as an alternative to the standard nasal swab. The testing method of self-collection can be expanded from the widely used RATs to NAAT and genomic testing which may inform the management and public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-05 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10186957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279 Text en Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Batty, M.
Prestedge, J.
Chan, H.T.
Soloczynskyj, K.
Tran, T.
Chibo, D.
D'Costa, J.
Caly, L.
Saville, M.
Hawkes, D.
Williamson, D.
A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title_full A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title_fullStr A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title_full_unstemmed A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title_short A LABORATORY VALIDATION OF SELF-COLLECTED NASAL SWAB AND RHINOSWAB FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
title_sort laboratory validation of self-collected nasal swab and rhinoswab for the detection of sars-cov-2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186957/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.279
work_keys_str_mv AT battym alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT prestedgej alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT chanht alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT soloczynskyjk alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT trant alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT chibod alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT dcostaj alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT calyl alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT savillem alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT hawkesd alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT williamsond alaboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT battym laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT prestedgej laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT chanht laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT soloczynskyjk laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT trant laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT chibod laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT dcostaj laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT calyl laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT savillem laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT hawkesd laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT williamsond laboratoryvalidationofselfcollectednasalswabandrhinoswabforthedetectionofsarscov2