Cargando…

Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk

Background Heparin anticoagulation (HA) is commonly employed for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE). However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, there were controversial opinions on the use of HA versus regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for mTPE. Our present study aimed to eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Jing, Yu, Yan, Wei, Suijiao, Tian, Xiujuan, Yang, Xiaoxia, Feng, Shidong, Li, Yajuan, Sun, Shiren, Zhang, Peng, Bai, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37183868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2210691
_version_ 1785042687601147904
author Jiao, Jing
Yu, Yan
Wei, Suijiao
Tian, Xiujuan
Yang, Xiaoxia
Feng, Shidong
Li, Yajuan
Sun, Shiren
Zhang, Peng
Bai, Ming
author_facet Jiao, Jing
Yu, Yan
Wei, Suijiao
Tian, Xiujuan
Yang, Xiaoxia
Feng, Shidong
Li, Yajuan
Sun, Shiren
Zhang, Peng
Bai, Ming
author_sort Jiao, Jing
collection PubMed
description Background Heparin anticoagulation (HA) is commonly employed for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE). However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, there were controversial opinions on the use of HA versus regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for mTPE. Our present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA vs. RCA for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk. Methods Patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent mTPE between 2014 and 2021 in our center were screened. Observations of anticoagulation efficacy and safety were used as the study endpoints. Results A total of 108 patients with 368 mTPE sessions were included. Of the included patients, 38 and 70 received HA and RCA mTPE, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clotting of extracorporeal circuits between the HA and RCA groups (4.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.605). More bleeding episodes were observed in the HA group compared to the RCA group (16.4% vs. 4.4% mTPE sessions, p < 0.001). The frequency of postoperative transfusion within 24 h (11% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.007) was significantly different in the HA and RCA group. Anticoagulation strategy (HA vs. RCA; OR 5.659, 95%CI 2.266–14.129; p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (prior treatment, OR 1.052, 95%CI 1.019–1.086; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors of bleeding episodes. At the end of mTPE treatment, the incidence of metabolic alkalosis (16.7% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.027) and hypocalcemia (41.7% vs. 89.2%, p = 0.001) was significantly different in the HA (n = 5, 12 sessions) and RCA (n = 22, 74 sessions) groups, respectively. Conclusion RCA is as effective as HA for mTPE. However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, RCA is associated with a lower risk of bleeding, compared with HA. With careful monitoring and timely adjustment, RCA most likely is a safe and effective anticoagulation option for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10187106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101871062023-05-17 Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk Jiao, Jing Yu, Yan Wei, Suijiao Tian, Xiujuan Yang, Xiaoxia Feng, Shidong Li, Yajuan Sun, Shiren Zhang, Peng Bai, Ming Ren Fail Research Article Background Heparin anticoagulation (HA) is commonly employed for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE). However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, there were controversial opinions on the use of HA versus regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for mTPE. Our present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA vs. RCA for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk. Methods Patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent mTPE between 2014 and 2021 in our center were screened. Observations of anticoagulation efficacy and safety were used as the study endpoints. Results A total of 108 patients with 368 mTPE sessions were included. Of the included patients, 38 and 70 received HA and RCA mTPE, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clotting of extracorporeal circuits between the HA and RCA groups (4.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.605). More bleeding episodes were observed in the HA group compared to the RCA group (16.4% vs. 4.4% mTPE sessions, p < 0.001). The frequency of postoperative transfusion within 24 h (11% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.007) was significantly different in the HA and RCA group. Anticoagulation strategy (HA vs. RCA; OR 5.659, 95%CI 2.266–14.129; p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (prior treatment, OR 1.052, 95%CI 1.019–1.086; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors of bleeding episodes. At the end of mTPE treatment, the incidence of metabolic alkalosis (16.7% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.027) and hypocalcemia (41.7% vs. 89.2%, p = 0.001) was significantly different in the HA (n = 5, 12 sessions) and RCA (n = 22, 74 sessions) groups, respectively. Conclusion RCA is as effective as HA for mTPE. However, for patients with increased bleeding risk, RCA is associated with a lower risk of bleeding, compared with HA. With careful monitoring and timely adjustment, RCA most likely is a safe and effective anticoagulation option for mTPE in patients with increased bleeding risk. Taylor & Francis 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10187106/ /pubmed/37183868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2210691 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiao, Jing
Yu, Yan
Wei, Suijiao
Tian, Xiujuan
Yang, Xiaoxia
Feng, Shidong
Li, Yajuan
Sun, Shiren
Zhang, Peng
Bai, Ming
Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title_full Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title_fullStr Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title_full_unstemmed Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title_short Heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
title_sort heparin anticoagulation versus regional citrate anticoagulation for membrane therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with increased bleeding risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37183868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2210691
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaojing heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT yuyan heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT weisuijiao heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT tianxiujuan heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT yangxiaoxia heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT fengshidong heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT liyajuan heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT sunshiren heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT zhangpeng heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk
AT baiming heparinanticoagulationversusregionalcitrateanticoagulationformembranetherapeuticplasmaexchangeinpatientswithincreasedbleedingrisk