Cargando…

The infralimbic and prelimbic cortical areas bidirectionally regulate safety learning during normal and stress conditions

Safety learning is a critical function for behavioral adaptation, environmental fitness, and mental health. Animal models have implicated the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in safety learning. However, whether these regions differentially contri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felix-Ortiz, Ada C., Terrell, Jaelyn M., Gonzalez, Carolina, Msengi, Hope D., Ramos, Angelica R., Boggan, Miranda B., Lopez-Pesina, Savannah M., Magalhães, Gabrielle, Burgos-Robles, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.05.539516
Descripción
Sumario:Safety learning is a critical function for behavioral adaptation, environmental fitness, and mental health. Animal models have implicated the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in safety learning. However, whether these regions differentially contribute to safety learning and how their contributions become affected by stress still remain poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated these issues using a novel semi-naturalistic mouse model for threat and safety learning. As mice navigated within a test arena, they learned that specific zones were associated with either noxious cold temperatures (“threat”) or pleasant warm temperatures (“safety”). Optogenetic-mediated inhibition revealed critical roles for the IL and PL regions for selectively controlling safety learning during these naturalistic conditions. This form of safety learning was also highly susceptible to stress pre-exposure, and while IL inhibition mimicked the deficits produced by stress, PL inhibition fully rescued safety learning in stress-exposed mice. Collectively, these findings indicate that IL and PL bidirectionally regulate safety learning during naturalistic situations, with the IL region promoting this function and the PL region suppressing it, especially after stress. A model of balanced IL and PL activity is proposed as a fundamental mechanism for controlling safety learning.