Cargando…

Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria

RESEARCH BACKGROUND: This study provides insight into the use of a designed microbial community to produce biohydrogen in simple, single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). The ability of MECs to stably produce biohydrogen relies heavily on the setup and microorganisms working inside the sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekadewi, Putty, Arbianti, Rita, Gomez, Cristina, Utami, Tania Surya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200786
http://dx.doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.01.23.7496
_version_ 1785042761671507968
author Ekadewi, Putty
Arbianti, Rita
Gomez, Cristina
Utami, Tania Surya
author_facet Ekadewi, Putty
Arbianti, Rita
Gomez, Cristina
Utami, Tania Surya
author_sort Ekadewi, Putty
collection PubMed
description RESEARCH BACKGROUND: This study provides insight into the use of a designed microbial community to produce biohydrogen in simple, single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). The ability of MECs to stably produce biohydrogen relies heavily on the setup and microorganisms working inside the system. Despite having the most straightforward configuration and effectively avoiding costly membranes, single-chamber MECs are prone to competing metabolic pathways. We present in this study one possible way of avoiding this problem using characteristically defined, designed microbial consortium. Here, we compare the performance of MECs inoculated with a designed consortium to MECs operating with a naturally occurring soil consortium. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We adapted a cost-effective and simple single-chamber MEC design. The MEC was gastight, 100 mL in volume, and equipped with continuous monitoring for electrical output using a digital multimeter. Microorganisms were sourced from Indonesian environmental samples, either as denitrifying bacterial isolates grouped as a designed consortium or natural soil microbiome used in its entirety. The designed consortium consisted of five species from the Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter genera. The headspace gas profile was monitored periodically with a gas chromatograph. At the end of the culture, the composition of the natural soil consortium was characterized by next generation sequencing and the growth of the bacteria on the surface of the anodes by field emission scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that MEC using a designed consortium presented a better H(2) production profile, with the ability of the system to maintain headspace H(2) concentration relatively stable for a long time after reaching stationary growth period. In contrast, MECs inoculated with soil microbiome exhibited a strong decline in headspace H(2) profile within the same time frame. NOVELTY AND SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: This work utilizes a designed, denitrifying bacterial consortium isolated from Indonesian environmental samples that can survive in a nitrate-rich environment. Here we propose using a designed consortium as a biological approach to avoid methanogenesis in MECs, as a simple and environmentally friendly alternative to current chemical/physical methods. Our findings offer an alternative solution to avoid the problem of H(2) loss in single-chamber MECs along with optimizing biohydrogen production through bioelectrochemical routes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10187575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher University of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101875752023-05-17 Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria Ekadewi, Putty Arbianti, Rita Gomez, Cristina Utami, Tania Surya Food Technol Biotechnol Original Scientific Papers RESEARCH BACKGROUND: This study provides insight into the use of a designed microbial community to produce biohydrogen in simple, single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). The ability of MECs to stably produce biohydrogen relies heavily on the setup and microorganisms working inside the system. Despite having the most straightforward configuration and effectively avoiding costly membranes, single-chamber MECs are prone to competing metabolic pathways. We present in this study one possible way of avoiding this problem using characteristically defined, designed microbial consortium. Here, we compare the performance of MECs inoculated with a designed consortium to MECs operating with a naturally occurring soil consortium. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We adapted a cost-effective and simple single-chamber MEC design. The MEC was gastight, 100 mL in volume, and equipped with continuous monitoring for electrical output using a digital multimeter. Microorganisms were sourced from Indonesian environmental samples, either as denitrifying bacterial isolates grouped as a designed consortium or natural soil microbiome used in its entirety. The designed consortium consisted of five species from the Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter genera. The headspace gas profile was monitored periodically with a gas chromatograph. At the end of the culture, the composition of the natural soil consortium was characterized by next generation sequencing and the growth of the bacteria on the surface of the anodes by field emission scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that MEC using a designed consortium presented a better H(2) production profile, with the ability of the system to maintain headspace H(2) concentration relatively stable for a long time after reaching stationary growth period. In contrast, MECs inoculated with soil microbiome exhibited a strong decline in headspace H(2) profile within the same time frame. NOVELTY AND SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: This work utilizes a designed, denitrifying bacterial consortium isolated from Indonesian environmental samples that can survive in a nitrate-rich environment. Here we propose using a designed consortium as a biological approach to avoid methanogenesis in MECs, as a simple and environmentally friendly alternative to current chemical/physical methods. Our findings offer an alternative solution to avoid the problem of H(2) loss in single-chamber MECs along with optimizing biohydrogen production through bioelectrochemical routes. University of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10187575/ /pubmed/37200786 http://dx.doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.01.23.7496 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Ekadewi, Putty
Arbianti, Rita
Gomez, Cristina
Utami, Tania Surya
Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title_full Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title_fullStr Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title_short Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell Operating on Designed Consortium of Denitrifying Bacteria
title_sort biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell operating on designed consortium of denitrifying bacteria
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200786
http://dx.doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.01.23.7496
work_keys_str_mv AT ekadewiputty biohydrogenproductioninmicrobialelectrolysiscelloperatingondesignedconsortiumofdenitrifyingbacteria
AT arbiantirita biohydrogenproductioninmicrobialelectrolysiscelloperatingondesignedconsortiumofdenitrifyingbacteria
AT gomezcristina biohydrogenproductioninmicrobialelectrolysiscelloperatingondesignedconsortiumofdenitrifyingbacteria
AT utamitaniasurya biohydrogenproductioninmicrobialelectrolysiscelloperatingondesignedconsortiumofdenitrifyingbacteria