Cargando…
Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition?
INTRODUCTION: An abdominal binder is an elastic or non-elastic belt applied to the abdomen in post-operative patients with abdominal surgery. These provide support and splintage to the operative wound, reducing incision site pain. The present work aims to investigate the institutional practices rega...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore. Pakistan
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197567 http://dx.doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v8i2.463 |
_version_ | 1785042764680921088 |
---|---|
author | Khalid, Ibtissam Bin Babar, Mahzaib Ahmed, Irfan |
author_facet | Khalid, Ibtissam Bin Babar, Mahzaib Ahmed, Irfan |
author_sort | Khalid, Ibtissam Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: An abdominal binder is an elastic or non-elastic belt applied to the abdomen in post-operative patients with abdominal surgery. These provide support and splintage to the operative wound, reducing incision site pain. The present work aims to investigate the institutional practices regarding the use of abdominal binders, gain insight into the expected benefits that these practices are targeted to achieve, and determine if current practices are in accordance with the available evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a survey-based questionnaire study conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. Respondents were inquired about designation, frequency of binder usage, reasons for prescribing/not prescribing binders, duration of the prescription, clinical factors that influence the decision to use binders and the estimated cost of the device. RESULTS: The questionnaire was emailed to 85 surgeons working in the department of surgical oncology. Out of these, 34 responded, resulting in an overall response rate of 40%. Twenty-two (64.7%) of the respondents used abdominal binders regularly in post-operative patients. Eight (22.5%) reported using it occasionally, while 4 (11.7%) did not use abdominal binders in their clinical practice. About 67.8% and 50% of the respondents believed that it helped early mobilisation and better pain control, respectively. About 60.7% of the respondents believed that binders prevent incisional hernia formation, while 46.4% were of the view that these prevented wound dehiscence. Up to 60% of the respondents reported using an abdominal binder for 1 week–1 month after discharge, whereas 23.3% preferred using it only till discharge. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates a gap between the evidence and actual practice. These gaps are often overlooked because of busy clinical practice. Equally important is the issue of surgical conservatism and the intrinsic desire to resist change by continuing old practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10187592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore. Pakistan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101875922023-05-16 Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? Khalid, Ibtissam Bin Babar, Mahzaib Ahmed, Irfan J Cancer Allied Spec Original Article INTRODUCTION: An abdominal binder is an elastic or non-elastic belt applied to the abdomen in post-operative patients with abdominal surgery. These provide support and splintage to the operative wound, reducing incision site pain. The present work aims to investigate the institutional practices regarding the use of abdominal binders, gain insight into the expected benefits that these practices are targeted to achieve, and determine if current practices are in accordance with the available evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a survey-based questionnaire study conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. Respondents were inquired about designation, frequency of binder usage, reasons for prescribing/not prescribing binders, duration of the prescription, clinical factors that influence the decision to use binders and the estimated cost of the device. RESULTS: The questionnaire was emailed to 85 surgeons working in the department of surgical oncology. Out of these, 34 responded, resulting in an overall response rate of 40%. Twenty-two (64.7%) of the respondents used abdominal binders regularly in post-operative patients. Eight (22.5%) reported using it occasionally, while 4 (11.7%) did not use abdominal binders in their clinical practice. About 67.8% and 50% of the respondents believed that it helped early mobilisation and better pain control, respectively. About 60.7% of the respondents believed that binders prevent incisional hernia formation, while 46.4% were of the view that these prevented wound dehiscence. Up to 60% of the respondents reported using an abdominal binder for 1 week–1 month after discharge, whereas 23.3% preferred using it only till discharge. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates a gap between the evidence and actual practice. These gaps are often overlooked because of busy clinical practice. Equally important is the issue of surgical conservatism and the intrinsic desire to resist change by continuing old practices. Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore. Pakistan 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10187592/ /pubmed/37197567 http://dx.doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v8i2.463 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Khalid IB, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khalid, Ibtissam Bin Babar, Mahzaib Ahmed, Irfan Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title | Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title_full | Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title_fullStr | Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title_short | Post-operative Use of Abdominal Binders: Bound to Tradition? |
title_sort | post-operative use of abdominal binders: bound to tradition? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197567 http://dx.doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v8i2.463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khalidibtissambin postoperativeuseofabdominalbindersboundtotradition AT babarmahzaib postoperativeuseofabdominalbindersboundtotradition AT ahmedirfan postoperativeuseofabdominalbindersboundtotradition |