Cargando…

Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*

Prognostic guidelines after cardiac arrest (CA) focus on unfavorable outcome prediction; favorable outcome prognostication received less attention. Our aim was to identify favorable outcome predictors and combine them into a multimodal model. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanat, Aurélien, Lee, Jong Woo, Elkhider, Hisham, Novy, Jan, Ben-Hamouda, Nawfel, Oddo, Mauro, Rossetti, Andrea O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36951448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005841
_version_ 1785042769857740800
author Vanat, Aurélien
Lee, Jong Woo
Elkhider, Hisham
Novy, Jan
Ben-Hamouda, Nawfel
Oddo, Mauro
Rossetti, Andrea O.
author_facet Vanat, Aurélien
Lee, Jong Woo
Elkhider, Hisham
Novy, Jan
Ben-Hamouda, Nawfel
Oddo, Mauro
Rossetti, Andrea O.
author_sort Vanat, Aurélien
collection PubMed
description Prognostic guidelines after cardiac arrest (CA) focus on unfavorable outcome prediction; favorable outcome prognostication received less attention. Our aim was to identify favorable outcome predictors and combine them into a multimodal model. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data (January 2016 to June 2021). SETTING: Two academic hospitals (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA). PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety-nine consecutive comatose adults admitted after CA. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CA variables (initial rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation), clinical examination (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness [FOUR] score at 72 hr, early myoclonus), electroencephalography (EEG) (reactivity, continuity, epileptiform features, and prespecified highly malignant patterns), somatosensory-evoked potentials, quantified pupillometry, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were retrieved. Neurologic outcome was assessed at 3 months using Cerebral Performance Category (CPC); 1 and 2 were considered as favorable outcome. Predictive performance of each variable toward favorable outcomes were calculated, and most discriminant items were combined to obtain a multimodal prognostic score, using multivariable ordinal logistic regression, receiving operator characteristic curves, and cross-validation. Our analysis identified a prognostic score including six modalities (1 point each): 1) early (12–36 hr) EEG not highly malignant, 2) early EEG background reactivity, 3) late (36–72 hr) EEG background reactivity and 4) continuity, 5) peak serum NSE within 48 hours less than or equal to 41 µg/L, and 6) FOUR score greater than or equal to 5 at 72 hours. At greater than or equal to 4 out of 6 points, sensitivity for CPC 1–2 was 97.5% (95% CI, 92.9–99.5%) and accuracy was 77.5% (95% CI, 72.7–81.8%); area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.91). The score showed similar performances in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes and externally validates a multimodal score, including clinical, EEG and biological items available within 72 hours, showing a high performance in identifying early comatose CA survivors who will reach functional independence at 3 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10187622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101876222023-05-17 Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study* Vanat, Aurélien Lee, Jong Woo Elkhider, Hisham Novy, Jan Ben-Hamouda, Nawfel Oddo, Mauro Rossetti, Andrea O. Crit Care Med Feature Articles Prognostic guidelines after cardiac arrest (CA) focus on unfavorable outcome prediction; favorable outcome prognostication received less attention. Our aim was to identify favorable outcome predictors and combine them into a multimodal model. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data (January 2016 to June 2021). SETTING: Two academic hospitals (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA). PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety-nine consecutive comatose adults admitted after CA. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CA variables (initial rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation), clinical examination (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness [FOUR] score at 72 hr, early myoclonus), electroencephalography (EEG) (reactivity, continuity, epileptiform features, and prespecified highly malignant patterns), somatosensory-evoked potentials, quantified pupillometry, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were retrieved. Neurologic outcome was assessed at 3 months using Cerebral Performance Category (CPC); 1 and 2 were considered as favorable outcome. Predictive performance of each variable toward favorable outcomes were calculated, and most discriminant items were combined to obtain a multimodal prognostic score, using multivariable ordinal logistic regression, receiving operator characteristic curves, and cross-validation. Our analysis identified a prognostic score including six modalities (1 point each): 1) early (12–36 hr) EEG not highly malignant, 2) early EEG background reactivity, 3) late (36–72 hr) EEG background reactivity and 4) continuity, 5) peak serum NSE within 48 hours less than or equal to 41 µg/L, and 6) FOUR score greater than or equal to 5 at 72 hours. At greater than or equal to 4 out of 6 points, sensitivity for CPC 1–2 was 97.5% (95% CI, 92.9–99.5%) and accuracy was 77.5% (95% CI, 72.7–81.8%); area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.91). The score showed similar performances in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes and externally validates a multimodal score, including clinical, EEG and biological items available within 72 hours, showing a high performance in identifying early comatose CA survivors who will reach functional independence at 3 months. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-23 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10187622/ /pubmed/36951448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005841 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Vanat, Aurélien
Lee, Jong Woo
Elkhider, Hisham
Novy, Jan
Ben-Hamouda, Nawfel
Oddo, Mauro
Rossetti, Andrea O.
Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title_full Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title_fullStr Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title_short Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study*
title_sort multimodal prediction of favorable outcome after cardiac arrest: a cohort study*
topic Feature Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36951448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005841
work_keys_str_mv AT vanataurelien multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT leejongwoo multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT elkhiderhisham multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT novyjan multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT benhamoudanawfel multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT oddomauro multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy
AT rossettiandreao multimodalpredictionoffavorableoutcomeaftercardiacarrestacohortstudy