Cargando…

Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?

PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Busetto, Gian Maria, Finati, Marco, Chirico, Marco, Cinelli, Francesco, D’Altilia, Nicola, Falagario, Ugo G., Sanguedolce, Francesca, Del Giudice, Francesco, De Berardinis, Ettore, Ferro, Matteo, Crocetto, Felice, Porreca, Angelo, Di Gianfrancesco, Luca, Calo’, Beppe, Mancini, Vito, Bettocchi, Carlo, Carrieri, Giuseppe, Cormio, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5
_version_ 1785042904152014848
author Busetto, Gian Maria
Finati, Marco
Chirico, Marco
Cinelli, Francesco
D’Altilia, Nicola
Falagario, Ugo G.
Sanguedolce, Francesca
Del Giudice, Francesco
De Berardinis, Ettore
Ferro, Matteo
Crocetto, Felice
Porreca, Angelo
Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
Calo’, Beppe
Mancini, Vito
Bettocchi, Carlo
Carrieri, Giuseppe
Cormio, Luigi
author_facet Busetto, Gian Maria
Finati, Marco
Chirico, Marco
Cinelli, Francesco
D’Altilia, Nicola
Falagario, Ugo G.
Sanguedolce, Francesca
Del Giudice, Francesco
De Berardinis, Ettore
Ferro, Matteo
Crocetto, Felice
Porreca, Angelo
Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
Calo’, Beppe
Mancini, Vito
Bettocchi, Carlo
Carrieri, Giuseppe
Cormio, Luigi
author_sort Busetto, Gian Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of intravesical electromotive drug administration of mytomicin-C (EMDA-MMC) improved the efficacy of second BCG course. METHODS: Patients with high-risk NMIBC having failed first BCG treatment and having refused RC were offered a second BCG induction course either alone (group A) or combined with EMDA-MMC (group B). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were tested. RESULTS: Of the 80 evaluable patients, 44 were in group A and 36 in group B; median follow-up was 38 months. RFS was significantly worse in group A whereas there was no difference in PFS and CSS between the two groups. Stratifying by disease stage, Ta patients receiving combined treatment had statistically better RFS and PFS survival than those receiving BCG only; this difference did not apply to T1 patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed that combined treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence and was close to predict progression. No tested variable was predictive of recurrence or progression in T1 tumours. Among those who underwent RC, CSS was 61.5% in those who had progression and 100% in those who remained with NMIBC. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment improved RFS and PFS only in patients with Ta disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10188396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101883962023-05-18 Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? Busetto, Gian Maria Finati, Marco Chirico, Marco Cinelli, Francesco D’Altilia, Nicola Falagario, Ugo G. Sanguedolce, Francesca Del Giudice, Francesco De Berardinis, Ettore Ferro, Matteo Crocetto, Felice Porreca, Angelo Di Gianfrancesco, Luca Calo’, Beppe Mancini, Vito Bettocchi, Carlo Carrieri, Giuseppe Cormio, Luigi World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of intravesical electromotive drug administration of mytomicin-C (EMDA-MMC) improved the efficacy of second BCG course. METHODS: Patients with high-risk NMIBC having failed first BCG treatment and having refused RC were offered a second BCG induction course either alone (group A) or combined with EMDA-MMC (group B). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were tested. RESULTS: Of the 80 evaluable patients, 44 were in group A and 36 in group B; median follow-up was 38 months. RFS was significantly worse in group A whereas there was no difference in PFS and CSS between the two groups. Stratifying by disease stage, Ta patients receiving combined treatment had statistically better RFS and PFS survival than those receiving BCG only; this difference did not apply to T1 patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed that combined treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence and was close to predict progression. No tested variable was predictive of recurrence or progression in T1 tumours. Among those who underwent RC, CSS was 61.5% in those who had progression and 100% in those who remained with NMIBC. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment improved RFS and PFS only in patients with Ta disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10188396/ /pubmed/36971825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Busetto, Gian Maria
Finati, Marco
Chirico, Marco
Cinelli, Francesco
D’Altilia, Nicola
Falagario, Ugo G.
Sanguedolce, Francesca
Del Giudice, Francesco
De Berardinis, Ettore
Ferro, Matteo
Crocetto, Felice
Porreca, Angelo
Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
Calo’, Beppe
Mancini, Vito
Bettocchi, Carlo
Carrieri, Giuseppe
Cormio, Luigi
Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title_full Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title_fullStr Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title_short Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
title_sort conservative treatment for high-risk nmibc failing bcg treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (emda) of mitomycin c (mmc) to a second bcg induction cycle?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5
work_keys_str_mv AT busettogianmaria conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT finatimarco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT chiricomarco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT cinellifrancesco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT daltilianicola conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT falagariougog conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT sanguedolcefrancesca conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT delgiudicefrancesco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT deberardinisettore conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT ferromatteo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT crocettofelice conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT porrecaangelo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT digianfrancescoluca conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT calobeppe conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT mancinivito conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT bettocchicarlo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT carrierigiuseppe conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle
AT cormioluigi conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle