Cargando…
Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle?
PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5 |
_version_ | 1785042904152014848 |
---|---|
author | Busetto, Gian Maria Finati, Marco Chirico, Marco Cinelli, Francesco D’Altilia, Nicola Falagario, Ugo G. Sanguedolce, Francesca Del Giudice, Francesco De Berardinis, Ettore Ferro, Matteo Crocetto, Felice Porreca, Angelo Di Gianfrancesco, Luca Calo’, Beppe Mancini, Vito Bettocchi, Carlo Carrieri, Giuseppe Cormio, Luigi |
author_facet | Busetto, Gian Maria Finati, Marco Chirico, Marco Cinelli, Francesco D’Altilia, Nicola Falagario, Ugo G. Sanguedolce, Francesca Del Giudice, Francesco De Berardinis, Ettore Ferro, Matteo Crocetto, Felice Porreca, Angelo Di Gianfrancesco, Luca Calo’, Beppe Mancini, Vito Bettocchi, Carlo Carrieri, Giuseppe Cormio, Luigi |
author_sort | Busetto, Gian Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of intravesical electromotive drug administration of mytomicin-C (EMDA-MMC) improved the efficacy of second BCG course. METHODS: Patients with high-risk NMIBC having failed first BCG treatment and having refused RC were offered a second BCG induction course either alone (group A) or combined with EMDA-MMC (group B). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were tested. RESULTS: Of the 80 evaluable patients, 44 were in group A and 36 in group B; median follow-up was 38 months. RFS was significantly worse in group A whereas there was no difference in PFS and CSS between the two groups. Stratifying by disease stage, Ta patients receiving combined treatment had statistically better RFS and PFS survival than those receiving BCG only; this difference did not apply to T1 patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed that combined treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence and was close to predict progression. No tested variable was predictive of recurrence or progression in T1 tumours. Among those who underwent RC, CSS was 61.5% in those who had progression and 100% in those who remained with NMIBC. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment improved RFS and PFS only in patients with Ta disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10188396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101883962023-05-18 Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? Busetto, Gian Maria Finati, Marco Chirico, Marco Cinelli, Francesco D’Altilia, Nicola Falagario, Ugo G. Sanguedolce, Francesca Del Giudice, Francesco De Berardinis, Ettore Ferro, Matteo Crocetto, Felice Porreca, Angelo Di Gianfrancesco, Luca Calo’, Beppe Mancini, Vito Bettocchi, Carlo Carrieri, Giuseppe Cormio, Luigi World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of intravesical electromotive drug administration of mytomicin-C (EMDA-MMC) improved the efficacy of second BCG course. METHODS: Patients with high-risk NMIBC having failed first BCG treatment and having refused RC were offered a second BCG induction course either alone (group A) or combined with EMDA-MMC (group B). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were tested. RESULTS: Of the 80 evaluable patients, 44 were in group A and 36 in group B; median follow-up was 38 months. RFS was significantly worse in group A whereas there was no difference in PFS and CSS between the two groups. Stratifying by disease stage, Ta patients receiving combined treatment had statistically better RFS and PFS survival than those receiving BCG only; this difference did not apply to T1 patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed that combined treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence and was close to predict progression. No tested variable was predictive of recurrence or progression in T1 tumours. Among those who underwent RC, CSS was 61.5% in those who had progression and 100% in those who remained with NMIBC. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment improved RFS and PFS only in patients with Ta disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10188396/ /pubmed/36971825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Busetto, Gian Maria Finati, Marco Chirico, Marco Cinelli, Francesco D’Altilia, Nicola Falagario, Ugo G. Sanguedolce, Francesca Del Giudice, Francesco De Berardinis, Ettore Ferro, Matteo Crocetto, Felice Porreca, Angelo Di Gianfrancesco, Luca Calo’, Beppe Mancini, Vito Bettocchi, Carlo Carrieri, Giuseppe Cormio, Luigi Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title | Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title_full | Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title_fullStr | Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title_short | Conservative treatment for high-risk NMIBC failing BCG treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) to a second BCG induction cycle? |
title_sort | conservative treatment for high-risk nmibc failing bcg treatment: who benefits from adding electromotive drug administration (emda) of mitomycin c (mmc) to a second bcg induction cycle? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04372-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT busettogianmaria conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT finatimarco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT chiricomarco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT cinellifrancesco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT daltilianicola conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT falagariougog conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT sanguedolcefrancesca conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT delgiudicefrancesco conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT deberardinisettore conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT ferromatteo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT crocettofelice conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT porrecaangelo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT digianfrancescoluca conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT calobeppe conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT mancinivito conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT bettocchicarlo conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT carrierigiuseppe conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle AT cormioluigi conservativetreatmentforhighrisknmibcfailingbcgtreatmentwhobenefitsfromaddingelectromotivedrugadministrationemdaofmitomycincmmctoasecondbcginductioncycle |