Cargando…

The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones (LPS) and factors affecting stone-free rate (SFR). METHODS: Data from 20 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, normal renal anatomy, and LPS. Exclus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giulioni, Carlo, Castellani, Daniele, Somani, Bhaskar Kumar, Chew, Ben Hall, Tailly, Thomas, Keat, William Ong Lay, Teoh, Jeremy Yuen‑Chun, Emiliani, Esteban, Chai, Chu Ann, Galosi, Andrea Benedetto, Ragoori, Deepak, Tanidir, Yiloren, Hamri, Saeed Bin, Gadzhiev, Nariman, Traxer, Olivier, Gauhar, Vineet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6
_version_ 1785042941732978688
author Giulioni, Carlo
Castellani, Daniele
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
Chew, Ben Hall
Tailly, Thomas
Keat, William Ong Lay
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen‑Chun
Emiliani, Esteban
Chai, Chu Ann
Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
Ragoori, Deepak
Tanidir, Yiloren
Hamri, Saeed Bin
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
author_facet Giulioni, Carlo
Castellani, Daniele
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
Chew, Ben Hall
Tailly, Thomas
Keat, William Ong Lay
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen‑Chun
Emiliani, Esteban
Chai, Chu Ann
Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
Ragoori, Deepak
Tanidir, Yiloren
Hamri, Saeed Bin
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
author_sort Giulioni, Carlo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones (LPS) and factors affecting stone-free rate (SFR). METHODS: Data from 20 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, normal renal anatomy, and LPS. Exclusion criteria were bilateral surgery, concomitant surgery for ureteral stones. SFR was defined as a single residual fragment (RF) ≤ 2 mm and evaluated 3-months after surgery. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with RF. Statistical significance was set at p value < 0.05. RESULTS: 2946 patients were included. Mean age and stone size were 49.9 years 10.19 mm, with multiple LPS in 61.1% of cases. Total operation and laser time were 63.89 ± 37.65 and 17.34 ± 18.39 min, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 3.55 days. Hematuria requiring blood transfusion and fever/urinary infections requiring prolonged antibiotics occurred in 6.1% and 169 5.7% of cases, while sepsis with intensive-care admission in 1.1% of patients. On multivariate analysis, Multiple stones (OR 1.380), stone size (OR 1.865), and reusable ureteroscopes (OR 1.414) were significantly associated with RF, while Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (OR 0.341) and pre-stenting (OR 0.750) were less likely associated with RF. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS showed safety and efficacy for LPS with a mean diameter of 10 mm. This procedure can achieve a satisfactory SFR in pre-stented patients with a single and smaller stone, particularly with TFL use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10188567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101885672023-05-18 The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients Giulioni, Carlo Castellani, Daniele Somani, Bhaskar Kumar Chew, Ben Hall Tailly, Thomas Keat, William Ong Lay Teoh, Jeremy Yuen‑Chun Emiliani, Esteban Chai, Chu Ann Galosi, Andrea Benedetto Ragoori, Deepak Tanidir, Yiloren Hamri, Saeed Bin Gadzhiev, Nariman Traxer, Olivier Gauhar, Vineet World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones (LPS) and factors affecting stone-free rate (SFR). METHODS: Data from 20 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, normal renal anatomy, and LPS. Exclusion criteria were bilateral surgery, concomitant surgery for ureteral stones. SFR was defined as a single residual fragment (RF) ≤ 2 mm and evaluated 3-months after surgery. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with RF. Statistical significance was set at p value < 0.05. RESULTS: 2946 patients were included. Mean age and stone size were 49.9 years 10.19 mm, with multiple LPS in 61.1% of cases. Total operation and laser time were 63.89 ± 37.65 and 17.34 ± 18.39 min, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 3.55 days. Hematuria requiring blood transfusion and fever/urinary infections requiring prolonged antibiotics occurred in 6.1% and 169 5.7% of cases, while sepsis with intensive-care admission in 1.1% of patients. On multivariate analysis, Multiple stones (OR 1.380), stone size (OR 1.865), and reusable ureteroscopes (OR 1.414) were significantly associated with RF, while Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (OR 0.341) and pre-stenting (OR 0.750) were less likely associated with RF. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS showed safety and efficacy for LPS with a mean diameter of 10 mm. This procedure can achieve a satisfactory SFR in pre-stented patients with a single and smaller stone, particularly with TFL use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10188567/ /pubmed/36930255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Giulioni, Carlo
Castellani, Daniele
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
Chew, Ben Hall
Tailly, Thomas
Keat, William Ong Lay
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen‑Chun
Emiliani, Esteban
Chai, Chu Ann
Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
Ragoori, Deepak
Tanidir, Yiloren
Hamri, Saeed Bin
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title_full The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title_fullStr The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title_short The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
title_sort efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (rirs) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6
work_keys_str_mv AT giulionicarlo theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT castellanidaniele theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT somanibhaskarkumar theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT chewbenhall theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT taillythomas theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT keatwilliamonglay theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT teohjeremyyuenchun theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT emilianiesteban theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT chaichuann theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT galosiandreabenedetto theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT ragoorideepak theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT tanidiryiloren theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT hamrisaeedbin theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT gadzhievnariman theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT traxerolivier theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT gauharvineet theefficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT giulionicarlo efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT castellanidaniele efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT somanibhaskarkumar efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT chewbenhall efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT taillythomas efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT keatwilliamonglay efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT teohjeremyyuenchun efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT emilianiesteban efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT chaichuann efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT galosiandreabenedetto efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT ragoorideepak efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT tanidiryiloren efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT hamrisaeedbin efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT gadzhievnariman efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT traxerolivier efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients
AT gauharvineet efficacyofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsforlowerpolestonesresultsfrom2946patients