Cargando…

Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study

INTRODUCTION: The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It’s usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR. PURPOSE (AIM): To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Striteska, Maja, Chovanec, Martin, Steinmetzer, Tobias, Chrobok, Viktor, Profant, Oliver, Schneider, Erich, Kremlacek, Jan, Valis, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37206911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1153102
_version_ 1785042971110932480
author Striteska, Maja
Chovanec, Martin
Steinmetzer, Tobias
Chrobok, Viktor
Profant, Oliver
Schneider, Erich
Kremlacek, Jan
Valis, Martin
author_facet Striteska, Maja
Chovanec, Martin
Steinmetzer, Tobias
Chrobok, Viktor
Profant, Oliver
Schneider, Erich
Kremlacek, Jan
Valis, Martin
author_sort Striteska, Maja
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It’s usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR. PURPOSE (AIM): To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to detect the differences between the VOR gains of the adducting and the abducting eye, to define the most precise VOR measure, and to assess gaze dys/conjugacy. We aimed to establish normative values for bvHIT adducting/abducting eye VOR gains and to introduce the VOR dysconjugacy ratio (vorDR) between adducting and abducting eyes for bvHIT. METHODS: We enrolled 44 healthy adult participants in a cross-sectional, prospective study using a repeated-measures design to assess test–retest reliability. A binocular EyeSeeCam Sci 2 device was used to simultaneously record bvHIT from both eyes during impulsive head stimulation in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: Pooled bvHIT retest gains of the adducting eye significantly exceeded those of the abducting eye (mean (SD): 1.08 (SD = 0.06), 0.95 (SD = 0.06), respectively). Both adduction and abduction gains showed similar variability, suggesting comparable precision and therefore equal suitability for VOR asymmetry assessment. The pooled vorDR here introduced to bvHIT was 1.13 (SD = 0.05). The test–retest repeatability coefficient was 0.06. CONCLUSION: Our study provides normative values reflecting the conjugacy of eye movement responses to horizontal bvHIT in healthy participants. The results were similar to a previous study using the gold-standard scleral search coil, which also reported greater VOR gains in the adducting than in the abducting eye. In analogy to the analysis of saccade conjugacy, we propose the use of a novel bvHIT dysconjugacy ratio to assess dys/conjugacy of VOR-induced eye movements. In addition, to accurately assess VOR asymmetry, and to avoid directional gain preponderance between adduction and abduction VOR-induced eye movements leading to monocular vHIT bias, we recommend using a binocular ductional VOR asymmetry index that compares the VOR gains of only the abduction or only the adduction movements of both eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10188932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101889322023-05-18 Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study Striteska, Maja Chovanec, Martin Steinmetzer, Tobias Chrobok, Viktor Profant, Oliver Schneider, Erich Kremlacek, Jan Valis, Martin Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It’s usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR. PURPOSE (AIM): To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to detect the differences between the VOR gains of the adducting and the abducting eye, to define the most precise VOR measure, and to assess gaze dys/conjugacy. We aimed to establish normative values for bvHIT adducting/abducting eye VOR gains and to introduce the VOR dysconjugacy ratio (vorDR) between adducting and abducting eyes for bvHIT. METHODS: We enrolled 44 healthy adult participants in a cross-sectional, prospective study using a repeated-measures design to assess test–retest reliability. A binocular EyeSeeCam Sci 2 device was used to simultaneously record bvHIT from both eyes during impulsive head stimulation in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: Pooled bvHIT retest gains of the adducting eye significantly exceeded those of the abducting eye (mean (SD): 1.08 (SD = 0.06), 0.95 (SD = 0.06), respectively). Both adduction and abduction gains showed similar variability, suggesting comparable precision and therefore equal suitability for VOR asymmetry assessment. The pooled vorDR here introduced to bvHIT was 1.13 (SD = 0.05). The test–retest repeatability coefficient was 0.06. CONCLUSION: Our study provides normative values reflecting the conjugacy of eye movement responses to horizontal bvHIT in healthy participants. The results were similar to a previous study using the gold-standard scleral search coil, which also reported greater VOR gains in the adducting than in the abducting eye. In analogy to the analysis of saccade conjugacy, we propose the use of a novel bvHIT dysconjugacy ratio to assess dys/conjugacy of VOR-induced eye movements. In addition, to accurately assess VOR asymmetry, and to avoid directional gain preponderance between adduction and abduction VOR-induced eye movements leading to monocular vHIT bias, we recommend using a binocular ductional VOR asymmetry index that compares the VOR gains of only the abduction or only the adduction movements of both eyes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10188932/ /pubmed/37206911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1153102 Text en Copyright © 2023 Striteska, Chovanec, Steinmetzer, Chrobok, Profant, Schneider, Kremlacek and Valis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Striteska, Maja
Chovanec, Martin
Steinmetzer, Tobias
Chrobok, Viktor
Profant, Oliver
Schneider, Erich
Kremlacek, Jan
Valis, Martin
Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title_full Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title_fullStr Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title_full_unstemmed Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title_short Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study
title_sort binocular video head impulse test: normative data study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37206911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1153102
work_keys_str_mv AT striteskamaja binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT chovanecmartin binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT steinmetzertobias binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT chrobokviktor binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT profantoliver binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT schneidererich binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT kremlacekjan binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy
AT valismartin binocularvideoheadimpulsetestnormativedatastudy