Cargando…

A diagnostic approach to detect cytogenetic heterogeneity and its prognostic significance in multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological disorder involving the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal plasma cells and its accumulation in the bone marrow. This study analyzed the frequency, cytogenetic heterogeneity, and clinical characteristics of patients with MM. METHODS: Bone marrow a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalal, Akanksha A., Arumugam, Meenakshi, Shetty, Vijith V., Shetty, K. Padma, Krishna, Rajesh, Shetty, Reshma A., Kulkarni, Nagaraj V., Shetty, D. Prashanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taibah University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37206191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.03.009
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological disorder involving the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal plasma cells and its accumulation in the bone marrow. This study analyzed the frequency, cytogenetic heterogeneity, and clinical characteristics of patients with MM. METHODS: Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 72 patients with MM and evaluated by conventional cytogenetics (CCs) and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) techniques for a panel of probes, including immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH)/CCND1, IgH/fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), IgH/MAFB, 13q deletion, and deletion 17p. RESULTS: CCs revealed abnormal karyotypes in 39% of the patients examined. The incidence of hypodiploidy was 28% (20/72) while that of hyperdiploidy was 10% (7/72). iFISH analysis revealed t(11;14) in 6% (4/72) and t(4;14) in 11% (8/72) of patients. Patients with hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy were associated with several monosomies and trisomies. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant difference between positive and negative groups for t(4;14), trisomy 14, and monosomy 13; this was associated with a shorter survival time. Cox proportional analysis identified t(4;14) (P = 0.032), trisomy 14 (P = 0.004), and monosomy 13 (P = 0.009), as significant factors with hazard ratio of 0.187 [confidence interval (CI): 0.041–0.862], 0.109 [CI: 0.024–0.500] and 0.134 [CI: 0.030–0.600]. CONCLUSION: In addition to cytogenetic abnormalities, iFISH analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among patients with MM. Cytogenetic heterogeneity in patients with MM should be considered as a major prognostic marker contributing to the variability of the disease. Our findings suggest that these abnormalities are independent prognostic factors.