Cargando…

Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review

Contact structure among livestock populations influences the transmission of infectious agents among them. Models simulating realistic contact networks therefore have important applications for generating insights relevant to livestock diseases. This systematic review identifies and compares such mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, William T. M., Rudge, James W., Fournié, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0890
_version_ 1785043059050807296
author Leung, William T. M.
Rudge, James W.
Fournié, Guillaume
author_facet Leung, William T. M.
Rudge, James W.
Fournié, Guillaume
author_sort Leung, William T. M.
collection PubMed
description Contact structure among livestock populations influences the transmission of infectious agents among them. Models simulating realistic contact networks therefore have important applications for generating insights relevant to livestock diseases. This systematic review identifies and compares such models, their applications, data sources and how their validity was assessed. From 52 publications, 37 models were identified comprising seven model frameworks. These included mathematical models (n = 8; including generalized random graphs, scale-free, Watts–Strogatz and spatial models), agent-based models (n = 8), radiation models (n = 1) (collectively, considered ‘mechanistic’), gravity models (n = 4), exponential random graph models (n = 9), other forms of statistical model (n = 6) (statistical) and random forests (n = 1) (machine learning). Overall, nearly half of the models were used as inputs for network-based epidemiological models. In all models, edges represented livestock movements, sometimes alongside other forms of contact. Statistical models were often applied to infer factors associated with network formation (n = 12). Mechanistic models were commonly applied to assess the interaction between network structure and disease dissemination (n = 6). Mechanistic, statistical and machine learning models were all applied to generate networks given limited data (n = 13). There was considerable variation in the approaches used for model validation. Finally, we discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of model frameworks in different use cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10189310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101893102023-05-18 Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review Leung, William T. M. Rudge, James W. Fournié, Guillaume J R Soc Interface Review Articles Contact structure among livestock populations influences the transmission of infectious agents among them. Models simulating realistic contact networks therefore have important applications for generating insights relevant to livestock diseases. This systematic review identifies and compares such models, their applications, data sources and how their validity was assessed. From 52 publications, 37 models were identified comprising seven model frameworks. These included mathematical models (n = 8; including generalized random graphs, scale-free, Watts–Strogatz and spatial models), agent-based models (n = 8), radiation models (n = 1) (collectively, considered ‘mechanistic’), gravity models (n = 4), exponential random graph models (n = 9), other forms of statistical model (n = 6) (statistical) and random forests (n = 1) (machine learning). Overall, nearly half of the models were used as inputs for network-based epidemiological models. In all models, edges represented livestock movements, sometimes alongside other forms of contact. Statistical models were often applied to infer factors associated with network formation (n = 12). Mechanistic models were commonly applied to assess the interaction between network structure and disease dissemination (n = 6). Mechanistic, statistical and machine learning models were all applied to generate networks given limited data (n = 13). There was considerable variation in the approaches used for model validation. Finally, we discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of model frameworks in different use cases. The Royal Society 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10189310/ /pubmed/37194271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0890 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Leung, William T. M.
Rudge, James W.
Fournié, Guillaume
Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title_full Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title_fullStr Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title_short Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
title_sort simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0890
work_keys_str_mv AT leungwilliamtm simulatingcontactnetworksforlivestockdiseaseepidemiologyasystematicreview
AT rudgejamesw simulatingcontactnetworksforlivestockdiseaseepidemiologyasystematicreview
AT fournieguillaume simulatingcontactnetworksforlivestockdiseaseepidemiologyasystematicreview