Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chuang, Min-Hsiang, Chen, I-Wen, Chen, Jen-Yin, Kang, Fu-Chi, Ho, Chun-Ning, Wu, Shao-Chun, Yew, Ming, Lan, Kuo-Mao, Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022
_version_ 1785043127506042880
author Chuang, Min-Hsiang
Chen, I-Wen
Chen, Jen-Yin
Kang, Fu-Chi
Ho, Chun-Ning
Wu, Shao-Chun
Yew, Ming
Lan, Kuo-Mao
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_facet Chuang, Min-Hsiang
Chen, I-Wen
Chen, Jen-Yin
Kang, Fu-Chi
Ho, Chun-Ning
Wu, Shao-Chun
Yew, Ming
Lan, Kuo-Mao
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_sort Chuang, Min-Hsiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 2022. Subgroup analysis based on dose of gefapixant (i.e. ≤20, 45–50 and ≥100 mg twice daily for low, moderate and high doses, respectively) was performed to explore a potential dose-dependent effect. RESULTS: Five studies involving seven trials showed the efficacy of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant for reducing objective 24-h cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 30.9% and 58.5%, respectively) (i.e. primary outcome) and awake cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 47.3% and 62.8%, respectively). Night-time cough frequency was only reduced with high-dose gefapixant. Consistently, the use of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant significantly alleviated cough severity and improved cough-related quality of life, but increased the risk of all-cause adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs and ageusia/dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Subgroup analysis showed dose dependency in both efficacy and AEs with a cut-off dose being ≥45 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed dose-dependent efficacy and adverse effects of gefapixant against chronic cough. Further studies are required to investigate the feasibility of moderate-dose (i.e. 45–50 mg twice daily) gefapixant in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10189640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101896402023-05-18 Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Chuang, Min-Hsiang Chen, I-Wen Chen, Jen-Yin Kang, Fu-Chi Ho, Chun-Ning Wu, Shao-Chun Yew, Ming Lan, Kuo-Mao Hung, Kuo-Chuan Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 2022. Subgroup analysis based on dose of gefapixant (i.e. ≤20, 45–50 and ≥100 mg twice daily for low, moderate and high doses, respectively) was performed to explore a potential dose-dependent effect. RESULTS: Five studies involving seven trials showed the efficacy of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant for reducing objective 24-h cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 30.9% and 58.5%, respectively) (i.e. primary outcome) and awake cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 47.3% and 62.8%, respectively). Night-time cough frequency was only reduced with high-dose gefapixant. Consistently, the use of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant significantly alleviated cough severity and improved cough-related quality of life, but increased the risk of all-cause adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs and ageusia/dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Subgroup analysis showed dose dependency in both efficacy and AEs with a cut-off dose being ≥45 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed dose-dependent efficacy and adverse effects of gefapixant against chronic cough. Further studies are required to investigate the feasibility of moderate-dose (i.e. 45–50 mg twice daily) gefapixant in clinical practice. European Respiratory Society 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10189640/ /pubmed/37197770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Reviews
Chuang, Min-Hsiang
Chen, I-Wen
Chen, Jen-Yin
Kang, Fu-Chi
Ho, Chun-Ning
Wu, Shao-Chun
Yew, Ming
Lan, Kuo-Mao
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT chuangminhsiang efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT cheniwen efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT chenjenyin efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT kangfuchi efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT hochunning efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT wushaochun efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT yewming efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT lankuomao efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT hungkuochuan efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials