Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022 |
_version_ | 1785043127506042880 |
---|---|
author | Chuang, Min-Hsiang Chen, I-Wen Chen, Jen-Yin Kang, Fu-Chi Ho, Chun-Ning Wu, Shao-Chun Yew, Ming Lan, Kuo-Mao Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_facet | Chuang, Min-Hsiang Chen, I-Wen Chen, Jen-Yin Kang, Fu-Chi Ho, Chun-Ning Wu, Shao-Chun Yew, Ming Lan, Kuo-Mao Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_sort | Chuang, Min-Hsiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 2022. Subgroup analysis based on dose of gefapixant (i.e. ≤20, 45–50 and ≥100 mg twice daily for low, moderate and high doses, respectively) was performed to explore a potential dose-dependent effect. RESULTS: Five studies involving seven trials showed the efficacy of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant for reducing objective 24-h cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 30.9% and 58.5%, respectively) (i.e. primary outcome) and awake cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 47.3% and 62.8%, respectively). Night-time cough frequency was only reduced with high-dose gefapixant. Consistently, the use of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant significantly alleviated cough severity and improved cough-related quality of life, but increased the risk of all-cause adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs and ageusia/dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Subgroup analysis showed dose dependency in both efficacy and AEs with a cut-off dose being ≥45 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed dose-dependent efficacy and adverse effects of gefapixant against chronic cough. Further studies are required to investigate the feasibility of moderate-dose (i.e. 45–50 mg twice daily) gefapixant in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10189640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101896402023-05-18 Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Chuang, Min-Hsiang Chen, I-Wen Chen, Jen-Yin Kang, Fu-Chi Ho, Chun-Ning Wu, Shao-Chun Yew, Ming Lan, Kuo-Mao Hung, Kuo-Chuan Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 2022. Subgroup analysis based on dose of gefapixant (i.e. ≤20, 45–50 and ≥100 mg twice daily for low, moderate and high doses, respectively) was performed to explore a potential dose-dependent effect. RESULTS: Five studies involving seven trials showed the efficacy of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant for reducing objective 24-h cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 30.9% and 58.5%, respectively) (i.e. primary outcome) and awake cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 47.3% and 62.8%, respectively). Night-time cough frequency was only reduced with high-dose gefapixant. Consistently, the use of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant significantly alleviated cough severity and improved cough-related quality of life, but increased the risk of all-cause adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs and ageusia/dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Subgroup analysis showed dose dependency in both efficacy and AEs with a cut-off dose being ≥45 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed dose-dependent efficacy and adverse effects of gefapixant against chronic cough. Further studies are required to investigate the feasibility of moderate-dose (i.e. 45–50 mg twice daily) gefapixant in clinical practice. European Respiratory Society 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10189640/ /pubmed/37197770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Reviews Chuang, Min-Hsiang Chen, I-Wen Chen, Jen-Yin Kang, Fu-Chi Ho, Chun-Ning Wu, Shao-Chun Yew, Ming Lan, Kuo-Mao Hung, Kuo-Chuan Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0219-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuangminhsiang efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT cheniwen efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT chenjenyin efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT kangfuchi efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT hochunning efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT wushaochun efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT yewming efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT lankuomao efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT hungkuochuan efficacyandsafetyofgefapixantforchroniccoughametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |