Cargando…

Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?

BACKGROUND: Accumulating data emphasizes the importance of olfaction in migraine pathophysiology. However, there are only a few studies evaluating how the migraine brain processes olfactory stimulation, and virtually no studies comparing patients with and without aura in this context. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mignot, Coralie, Faria, Vanda, Hummel, Thomas, Frost, Marie, Michel, Christoph M., Gossrau, Gudrun, Haehner, Antje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01592-3
_version_ 1785043145286746112
author Mignot, Coralie
Faria, Vanda
Hummel, Thomas
Frost, Marie
Michel, Christoph M.
Gossrau, Gudrun
Haehner, Antje
author_facet Mignot, Coralie
Faria, Vanda
Hummel, Thomas
Frost, Marie
Michel, Christoph M.
Gossrau, Gudrun
Haehner, Antje
author_sort Mignot, Coralie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating data emphasizes the importance of olfaction in migraine pathophysiology. However, there are only a few studies evaluating how the migraine brain processes olfactory stimulation, and virtually no studies comparing patients with and without aura in this context. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recorded event-related potentials from 64 electrodes during a pure olfactory or pure trigeminal stimulus in females with episodic migraine with aura (n = 13) and without aura (n = 15), to characterize the central nervous processing of these intranasal stimuli. Patients were tested in interictal state only. Data were analyzed in the time domain and in the time–frequency domain. Source reconstruction analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Patients with aura had higher event-related potentials amplitudes for left-sided trigeminal and left-sided olfactory stimulations, and higher neural activity for right-sided trigeminal stimulation in brain areas related to trigeminal and visual processing. Following olfactory stimulations patients with aura displayed decreased neural activity in secondary olfactory structures compared to patients without aura. Oscillations in the low frequency bands (< 8 Hz) differed between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether this may reflect hypersensitivity to nociceptive stimuli in patients with aura relative to patients without aura. Patients with aura have a bigger deficit in engaging secondary olfactory-related structures, possibly leading to distorted attention and judgements towards odors. The cerebral overlap between trigeminal nociception and olfaction might explain these deficits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01592-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10189721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101897212023-05-18 Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances? Mignot, Coralie Faria, Vanda Hummel, Thomas Frost, Marie Michel, Christoph M. Gossrau, Gudrun Haehner, Antje J Headache Pain Research BACKGROUND: Accumulating data emphasizes the importance of olfaction in migraine pathophysiology. However, there are only a few studies evaluating how the migraine brain processes olfactory stimulation, and virtually no studies comparing patients with and without aura in this context. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recorded event-related potentials from 64 electrodes during a pure olfactory or pure trigeminal stimulus in females with episodic migraine with aura (n = 13) and without aura (n = 15), to characterize the central nervous processing of these intranasal stimuli. Patients were tested in interictal state only. Data were analyzed in the time domain and in the time–frequency domain. Source reconstruction analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Patients with aura had higher event-related potentials amplitudes for left-sided trigeminal and left-sided olfactory stimulations, and higher neural activity for right-sided trigeminal stimulation in brain areas related to trigeminal and visual processing. Following olfactory stimulations patients with aura displayed decreased neural activity in secondary olfactory structures compared to patients without aura. Oscillations in the low frequency bands (< 8 Hz) differed between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether this may reflect hypersensitivity to nociceptive stimuli in patients with aura relative to patients without aura. Patients with aura have a bigger deficit in engaging secondary olfactory-related structures, possibly leading to distorted attention and judgements towards odors. The cerebral overlap between trigeminal nociception and olfaction might explain these deficits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01592-3. Springer Milan 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10189721/ /pubmed/37198532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01592-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mignot, Coralie
Faria, Vanda
Hummel, Thomas
Frost, Marie
Michel, Christoph M.
Gossrau, Gudrun
Haehner, Antje
Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title_full Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title_fullStr Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title_full_unstemmed Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title_short Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
title_sort migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01592-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mignotcoralie migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT fariavanda migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT hummelthomas migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT frostmarie migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT michelchristophm migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT gossraugudrun migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances
AT haehnerantje migrainewithauralesscontroloverpainandfragrances