Cargando…
Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy
The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.006 |
_version_ | 1785043179261657088 |
---|---|
author | Perl, Alexander E. Larson, Richard A. Podoltsev, Nikolai A. Strickland, Stephen Wang, Eunice S. Atallah, Ehab Schiller, Gary J. Martinelli, Giovanni Neubauer, Andreas Sierra, Jorge Montesinos, Pau Recher, Christian Yoon, Sung-Soo Maeda, Yoshinobu Hosono, Naoko Onozawa, Masahiro Kato, Takayasu Kim, Hee-Je Hasabou, Nahla Nuthethi, Rishita Tiu, Ramon Levis, Mark J. |
author_facet | Perl, Alexander E. Larson, Richard A. Podoltsev, Nikolai A. Strickland, Stephen Wang, Eunice S. Atallah, Ehab Schiller, Gary J. Martinelli, Giovanni Neubauer, Andreas Sierra, Jorge Montesinos, Pau Recher, Christian Yoon, Sung-Soo Maeda, Yoshinobu Hosono, Naoko Onozawa, Masahiro Kato, Takayasu Kim, Hee-Je Hasabou, Nahla Nuthethi, Rishita Tiu, Ramon Levis, Mark J. |
author_sort | Perl, Alexander E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10189888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101898882023-05-17 Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy Perl, Alexander E. Larson, Richard A. Podoltsev, Nikolai A. Strickland, Stephen Wang, Eunice S. Atallah, Ehab Schiller, Gary J. Martinelli, Giovanni Neubauer, Andreas Sierra, Jorge Montesinos, Pau Recher, Christian Yoon, Sung-Soo Maeda, Yoshinobu Hosono, Naoko Onozawa, Masahiro Kato, Takayasu Kim, Hee-Je Hasabou, Nahla Nuthethi, Rishita Tiu, Ramon Levis, Mark J. Transplant Cell Ther Article The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients. 2023-04 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10189888/ /pubmed/36526260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.006 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Perl, Alexander E. Larson, Richard A. Podoltsev, Nikolai A. Strickland, Stephen Wang, Eunice S. Atallah, Ehab Schiller, Gary J. Martinelli, Giovanni Neubauer, Andreas Sierra, Jorge Montesinos, Pau Recher, Christian Yoon, Sung-Soo Maeda, Yoshinobu Hosono, Naoko Onozawa, Masahiro Kato, Takayasu Kim, Hee-Je Hasabou, Nahla Nuthethi, Rishita Tiu, Ramon Levis, Mark J. Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title | Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title_full | Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title_short | Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy |
title_sort | outcomes in patients with flt3-mutated relapsed/ refractory acute myelogenous leukemia who underwent transplantation in the phase 3 admiral trial of gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perlalexandere outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT larsonricharda outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT podoltsevnikolaia outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT stricklandstephen outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT wangeunices outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT atallahehab outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT schillergaryj outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT martinelligiovanni outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT neubauerandreas outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT sierrajorge outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT montesinospau outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT recherchristian outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT yoonsungsoo outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT maedayoshinobu outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT hosononaoko outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT onozawamasahiro outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT katotakayasu outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT kimheeje outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT hasabounahla outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT nuthethirishita outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT tiuramon outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy AT levismarkj outcomesinpatientswithflt3mutatedrelapsedrefractoryacutemyelogenousleukemiawhounderwenttransplantationinthephase3admiraltrialofgilteritinibversussalvagechemotherapy |