Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil, Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan, Mathai, Vijay, Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano, Christopher, Sarah Renjelina, Ravi, Vijil Vimala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205885
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22
_version_ 1785043217281974272
author Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil
Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan
Mathai, Vijay
Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano
Christopher, Sarah Renjelina
Ravi, Vijil Vimala
author_facet Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil
Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan
Mathai, Vijay
Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano
Christopher, Sarah Renjelina
Ravi, Vijil Vimala
author_sort Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill using customized stainless steel molds and divided into six groups of 15 samples each based on the heat treatment. Group I (control group): no heat treatment, Group II: preheat treatment at 60°C, Group III: postcure heat treatment at 100°C, Group IV: postcure heat treatment at 200°C, Group V: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 100°C, and Group VI: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 200°C. The degree of conversion was analyzed using Raman spectrometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Scheffé test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 version. RESULTS: The order of values of degree of conversion from maximum to minimum for the groups are as follows: Group VI (98.77 ± 0.52) > Group V (97.11 ± 0.78) > Group IV (95.00 ± 0.86) > Group III (93.00 ± 1.22) > Group II (86.88 ± 1.36) > Group I (76.55 ± 1.42). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined heat treatment samples showed better values of degree of conversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10190096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101900962023-05-18 A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Mathai, Vijay Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Christopher, Sarah Renjelina Ravi, Vijil Vimala J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill using customized stainless steel molds and divided into six groups of 15 samples each based on the heat treatment. Group I (control group): no heat treatment, Group II: preheat treatment at 60°C, Group III: postcure heat treatment at 100°C, Group IV: postcure heat treatment at 200°C, Group V: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 100°C, and Group VI: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 200°C. The degree of conversion was analyzed using Raman spectrometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Scheffé test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 version. RESULTS: The order of values of degree of conversion from maximum to minimum for the groups are as follows: Group VI (98.77 ± 0.52) > Group V (97.11 ± 0.78) > Group IV (95.00 ± 0.86) > Group III (93.00 ± 1.22) > Group II (86.88 ± 1.36) > Group I (76.55 ± 1.42). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined heat treatment samples showed better values of degree of conversion. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10190096/ /pubmed/37205885 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil
Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan
Mathai, Vijay
Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano
Christopher, Sarah Renjelina
Ravi, Vijil Vimala
A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205885
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22
work_keys_str_mv AT verghesereshvepulikottil acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT nairrajeshsasidharan acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT mathaivijay acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT christophersarahrenjelina acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT ravivijilvimala acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT verghesereshvepulikottil comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT nairrajeshsasidharan comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT mathaivijay comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT christophersarahrenjelina comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT ravivijilvimala comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy