Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill usin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205885 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22 |
_version_ | 1785043217281974272 |
---|---|
author | Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Mathai, Vijay Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Christopher, Sarah Renjelina Ravi, Vijil Vimala |
author_facet | Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Mathai, Vijay Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Christopher, Sarah Renjelina Ravi, Vijil Vimala |
author_sort | Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill using customized stainless steel molds and divided into six groups of 15 samples each based on the heat treatment. Group I (control group): no heat treatment, Group II: preheat treatment at 60°C, Group III: postcure heat treatment at 100°C, Group IV: postcure heat treatment at 200°C, Group V: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 100°C, and Group VI: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 200°C. The degree of conversion was analyzed using Raman spectrometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Scheffé test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 version. RESULTS: The order of values of degree of conversion from maximum to minimum for the groups are as follows: Group VI (98.77 ± 0.52) > Group V (97.11 ± 0.78) > Group IV (95.00 ± 0.86) > Group III (93.00 ± 1.22) > Group II (86.88 ± 1.36) > Group I (76.55 ± 1.42). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined heat treatment samples showed better values of degree of conversion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10190096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101900962023-05-18 A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Mathai, Vijay Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Christopher, Sarah Renjelina Ravi, Vijil Vimala J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the degree of conversion of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Composite subjected to preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 samples were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill using customized stainless steel molds and divided into six groups of 15 samples each based on the heat treatment. Group I (control group): no heat treatment, Group II: preheat treatment at 60°C, Group III: postcure heat treatment at 100°C, Group IV: postcure heat treatment at 200°C, Group V: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 100°C, and Group VI: combined preheat treatment at 60°C and postcure heat treatment at 200°C. The degree of conversion was analyzed using Raman spectrometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Scheffé test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 version. RESULTS: The order of values of degree of conversion from maximum to minimum for the groups are as follows: Group VI (98.77 ± 0.52) > Group V (97.11 ± 0.78) > Group IV (95.00 ± 0.86) > Group III (93.00 ± 1.22) > Group II (86.88 ± 1.36) > Group I (76.55 ± 1.42). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined heat treatment samples showed better values of degree of conversion. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10190096/ /pubmed/37205885 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Verghese, Reshve Pulikottil Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Mathai, Vijay Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Christopher, Sarah Renjelina Ravi, Vijil Vimala A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title | A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of preheat treatment, postcure heat treatment, and combined heat treatment on degree of conversion of a bulk-fill composite: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205885 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_360_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verghesereshvepulikottil acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT nairrajeshsasidharan acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT mathaivijay acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT christophersarahrenjelina acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT ravivijilvimala acomparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT verghesereshvepulikottil comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT nairrajeshsasidharan comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT mathaivijay comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT christophersarahrenjelina comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy AT ravivijilvimala comparativeevaluationofpreheattreatmentpostcureheattreatmentandcombinedheattreatmentondegreeofconversionofabulkfillcompositeaninvitrostudy |