Cargando…

Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has killed at least 1.1 million people in the United States and over 6.7 million globally. Accurately estimating the age-specific infection fatality rate (IFR) of SARS-CoV-2 for different populations is crucial for assessing and understanding the impact of COVID-19 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rickards, Chloe G., Kilpatrick, A. Marm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37196049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285612
_version_ 1785043425578450944
author Rickards, Chloe G.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
author_facet Rickards, Chloe G.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
author_sort Rickards, Chloe G.
collection PubMed
description The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has killed at least 1.1 million people in the United States and over 6.7 million globally. Accurately estimating the age-specific infection fatality rate (IFR) of SARS-CoV-2 for different populations is crucial for assessing and understanding the impact of COVID-19 and for appropriately allocating vaccines and treatments to at-risk groups. We estimated age-specific IFRs of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 using published seroprevalence, case, and death data from New York City (NYC) from March to May 2020, using a Bayesian framework that accounted for delays between key epidemiological events. IFRs increased 3-4-fold with every 20 years of age, from 0.06% in individuals between 18–45 years old to 4.7% in individuals over 75. We then compared IFRs in NYC to several city- and country-wide estimates including England, Switzerland (Geneva), Sweden (Stockholm), Belgium, Mexico, and Brazil, as well as a global estimate. IFRs in NYC were higher for individuals younger than 65 years old than most other populations, but similar for older individuals. IFRs for age groups less than 65 decreased with income and increased with income inequality measured using the Gini index. These results demonstrate that the age-specific fatality of COVID-19 differs among developed countries and raises questions about factors underlying these differences, including underlying health conditions and healthcare access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10191265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101912652023-05-18 Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality Rickards, Chloe G. Kilpatrick, A. Marm PLoS One Research Article The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has killed at least 1.1 million people in the United States and over 6.7 million globally. Accurately estimating the age-specific infection fatality rate (IFR) of SARS-CoV-2 for different populations is crucial for assessing and understanding the impact of COVID-19 and for appropriately allocating vaccines and treatments to at-risk groups. We estimated age-specific IFRs of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 using published seroprevalence, case, and death data from New York City (NYC) from March to May 2020, using a Bayesian framework that accounted for delays between key epidemiological events. IFRs increased 3-4-fold with every 20 years of age, from 0.06% in individuals between 18–45 years old to 4.7% in individuals over 75. We then compared IFRs in NYC to several city- and country-wide estimates including England, Switzerland (Geneva), Sweden (Stockholm), Belgium, Mexico, and Brazil, as well as a global estimate. IFRs in NYC were higher for individuals younger than 65 years old than most other populations, but similar for older individuals. IFRs for age groups less than 65 decreased with income and increased with income inequality measured using the Gini index. These results demonstrate that the age-specific fatality of COVID-19 differs among developed countries and raises questions about factors underlying these differences, including underlying health conditions and healthcare access. Public Library of Science 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10191265/ /pubmed/37196049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285612 Text en © 2023 Rickards, Marm Kilpatrick https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rickards, Chloe G.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title_full Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title_fullStr Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title_full_unstemmed Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title_short Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
title_sort age-specific sars-cov-2 infection fatality rates derived from serological data vary with income and income inequality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37196049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285612
work_keys_str_mv AT rickardschloeg agespecificsarscov2infectionfatalityratesderivedfromserologicaldatavarywithincomeandincomeinequality
AT kilpatrickamarm agespecificsarscov2infectionfatalityratesderivedfromserologicaldatavarywithincomeandincomeinequality