Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels
Recipient vessel selection is vital for successful autologous free-flap breast reconstruction. Internal mammary artery perforators have gained interest as a recipient vessel option. However, previous studies on their microsurgical safety and efficacy are limited and inconsistent. Thus, we conducted...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004969 |
_version_ | 1785043471505031168 |
---|---|
author | Fernandez-Diaz, Oscar F. Christopoulos, Georgios Griffiths, Matthew |
author_facet | Fernandez-Diaz, Oscar F. Christopoulos, Georgios Griffiths, Matthew |
author_sort | Fernandez-Diaz, Oscar F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recipient vessel selection is vital for successful autologous free-flap breast reconstruction. Internal mammary artery perforators have gained interest as a recipient vessel option. However, previous studies on their microsurgical safety and efficacy are limited and inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of using internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction. METHODS: The protocol has been previously published in PROSPERO (CRD42020190020). The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PROSPERO databases were searched. Two independent reviewers evaluated the articles for inclusion in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the MINORS instrument (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies). RESULTS: Of the 361 articles screened, 13 studies were included (313 patients with 318 flaps; 223 unilateral, 31 bilateral, mean average age 51.2 and mean BMI 27.8 ± 1.9). The mean overall success rate was 99.8%, the pooled surgical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97%–100%], and the overall rate of complications was 11% (95% CI: 7%–18%). The most common complication was vascular-related to microanastomoses, with an incidence of 5% (95% CI: 2%–10%). The fat necrosis rate was 3% (95% CI: 2%–6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study verified that internal mammary artery perforator vessels are reliable in breast reconstruction, with a high success rate and a relatively low complication rate. Moreover, in selected microsurgical breast reconstruction patients, internal mammary artery perforators may be the primary recipient vessel choice over the internal mammary artery or thoracodorsal vessels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10191480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101914802023-05-18 A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels Fernandez-Diaz, Oscar F. Christopoulos, Georgios Griffiths, Matthew Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Recipient vessel selection is vital for successful autologous free-flap breast reconstruction. Internal mammary artery perforators have gained interest as a recipient vessel option. However, previous studies on their microsurgical safety and efficacy are limited and inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of using internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction. METHODS: The protocol has been previously published in PROSPERO (CRD42020190020). The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PROSPERO databases were searched. Two independent reviewers evaluated the articles for inclusion in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the MINORS instrument (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies). RESULTS: Of the 361 articles screened, 13 studies were included (313 patients with 318 flaps; 223 unilateral, 31 bilateral, mean average age 51.2 and mean BMI 27.8 ± 1.9). The mean overall success rate was 99.8%, the pooled surgical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97%–100%], and the overall rate of complications was 11% (95% CI: 7%–18%). The most common complication was vascular-related to microanastomoses, with an incidence of 5% (95% CI: 2%–10%). The fat necrosis rate was 3% (95% CI: 2%–6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study verified that internal mammary artery perforator vessels are reliable in breast reconstruction, with a high success rate and a relatively low complication rate. Moreover, in selected microsurgical breast reconstruction patients, internal mammary artery perforators may be the primary recipient vessel choice over the internal mammary artery or thoracodorsal vessels. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10191480/ /pubmed/37207242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004969 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Fernandez-Diaz, Oscar F. Christopoulos, Georgios Griffiths, Matthew A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction using internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezdiazoscarf asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels AT christopoulosgeorgios asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels AT griffithsmatthew asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels AT fernandezdiazoscarf systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels AT christopoulosgeorgios systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels AT griffithsmatthew systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomesinautologousbreastreconstructionusinginternalmammaryarteryperforatorsasrecipientvessels |