Cargando…
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
BACKGROUND: The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles. Since LLMs generate grammatically correct and mostly relevant (yet sometimes outright wrong, irrelevant or biased) outputs in response to provi...
Autores principales: | Hosseini, Mohammad, Horbach, Serge P. J. M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review
por: Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
por: Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT
por: Fujimoto, Sasuke, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
On the Hyping of Scholarly Research (with a Shout-Out to ChatGPT)
por: Jandrić, Petar
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
por: Verharen, Jeroen PH
Publicado: (2023)