Cargando…

Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Saccone, G., Carugno, J, Pacheco, L.A., Zizolfi, B, Haimovich, S, Clark, T.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781106
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.2.023
_version_ 1785043509035663360
author Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Saccone, G.
Carugno, J
Pacheco, L.A.
Zizolfi, B
Haimovich, S
Clark, T.J.
author_facet Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Saccone, G.
Carugno, J
Pacheco, L.A.
Zizolfi, B
Haimovich, S
Clark, T.J.
author_sort Di Spiezio Sardo, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classification. Endometrial biopsy can be performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation, but also using blind sampling techniques OBJECTIVES: To compare endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until March 2022.We included all studies comparing endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sample adequacy, failure rate to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia, and rate of detection of endometrial cancer. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% of confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation was associated with a significantly higher rate of sample adequacy (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), and significantly lower risk of failure to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92) compared to blind endometrial sampling. However, there was no significant difference between endometrial biopsies taken under direct hysteroscopic visualisation or blindly, with or without a preceding diagnostic hysteroscopy, in the rate of detection of endometrial cancer (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation is associated with significantly higher rate of sample adequacy and is comparable to blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and precancer. WHAT IS NEW? Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation would be expected to reduce diagnostic failure for endometrial cancer compared to blind endometrial sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10191705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101917052023-05-18 Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis Di Spiezio Sardo, A Saccone, G. Carugno, J Pacheco, L.A. Zizolfi, B Haimovich, S Clark, T.J. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Review BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classification. Endometrial biopsy can be performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation, but also using blind sampling techniques OBJECTIVES: To compare endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until March 2022.We included all studies comparing endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sample adequacy, failure rate to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia, and rate of detection of endometrial cancer. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% of confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation was associated with a significantly higher rate of sample adequacy (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), and significantly lower risk of failure to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92) compared to blind endometrial sampling. However, there was no significant difference between endometrial biopsies taken under direct hysteroscopic visualisation or blindly, with or without a preceding diagnostic hysteroscopy, in the rate of detection of endometrial cancer (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation is associated with significantly higher rate of sample adequacy and is comparable to blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and precancer. WHAT IS NEW? Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation would be expected to reduce diagnostic failure for endometrial cancer compared to blind endometrial sampling. Universa Press 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10191705/ /pubmed/35781106 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.2.023 Text en Copyright © 2022 Facts, Views & Vision https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Saccone, G.
Carugno, J
Pacheco, L.A.
Zizolfi, B
Haimovich, S
Clark, T.J.
Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781106
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.2.023
work_keys_str_mv AT dispieziosardoa endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sacconeg endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carugnoj endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pachecola endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zizolfib endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haimovichs endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarktj endometrialbiopsyunderdirecthysteroscopicvisualisationversusblindendometrialsamplingforthediagnosisofendometrialhyperplasiaandcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis