Cargando…
Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy
Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of complex colorectal polyps (≥ 2 cm) can be technically challenging. A dual balloon endoluminal overtube platform (DBEP) was developed to facilitate colonoscopic polypectomy. The study purpose was to evaluate clinical outcomes with the DBEP for complex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37206694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2057-4286 |
_version_ | 1785043514556416000 |
---|---|
author | Othman, Mohamed O. Diehl, David L. Khara, Harshit S. Jawaid, Salman Yang, Dennis Draganov, Peter V. |
author_facet | Othman, Mohamed O. Diehl, David L. Khara, Harshit S. Jawaid, Salman Yang, Dennis Draganov, Peter V. |
author_sort | Othman, Mohamed O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of complex colorectal polyps (≥ 2 cm) can be technically challenging. A dual balloon endoluminal overtube platform (DBEP) was developed to facilitate colonoscopic polypectomy. The study purpose was to evaluate clinical outcomes with the DBEP for complex polypectomy. Patients and methods This was an observational, prospective, multicenter Institutional Review Board-approved study. Between January 2018 and December 2020, safety and performance data were collected intra-procedurally and at 1 month post-procedure in patients undergoing intervention with the DBEP at three US centers. The primary endpoint was device safety and technical success of the procedure. Secondary endpoints included navigation time, total procedure time, and user feedback assessment post-procedure. Results A total of 162 patients underwent colonoscopy with the DBEP. Of these, 144 (89 %) underwent 156 interventions successfully with DBEP (44.5 % endoscopic mucosal resection, 53.2 % hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/ESD, 1.3 % other). In 13 patients (8 %), device challenges contributed to unsuccessful intervention. One mild device-related adverse event (AE) occurred. Procedural AE rate was 8.3 %. Median lesion size was 2.6 cm [range 0.5–12]. The investigators felt that navigating the device was easy/somewhat easy in 78.5 % of successful cases. Median total procedure time was 69 minutes [range, 19–213], median navigation time to lesion was 8 minutes [range, 1–80], And median polypectomy time was 33.5 minutes [range, 2–143]. Conclusions Endoscopic colon polyp resection with the DBEP was safe with a high technical success rate. The DBEP has the potential to provide enhanced scope stability and visualization, traction, and a conduit for scope exchange. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10191729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101917292023-05-18 Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy Othman, Mohamed O. Diehl, David L. Khara, Harshit S. Jawaid, Salman Yang, Dennis Draganov, Peter V. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of complex colorectal polyps (≥ 2 cm) can be technically challenging. A dual balloon endoluminal overtube platform (DBEP) was developed to facilitate colonoscopic polypectomy. The study purpose was to evaluate clinical outcomes with the DBEP for complex polypectomy. Patients and methods This was an observational, prospective, multicenter Institutional Review Board-approved study. Between January 2018 and December 2020, safety and performance data were collected intra-procedurally and at 1 month post-procedure in patients undergoing intervention with the DBEP at three US centers. The primary endpoint was device safety and technical success of the procedure. Secondary endpoints included navigation time, total procedure time, and user feedback assessment post-procedure. Results A total of 162 patients underwent colonoscopy with the DBEP. Of these, 144 (89 %) underwent 156 interventions successfully with DBEP (44.5 % endoscopic mucosal resection, 53.2 % hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/ESD, 1.3 % other). In 13 patients (8 %), device challenges contributed to unsuccessful intervention. One mild device-related adverse event (AE) occurred. Procedural AE rate was 8.3 %. Median lesion size was 2.6 cm [range 0.5–12]. The investigators felt that navigating the device was easy/somewhat easy in 78.5 % of successful cases. Median total procedure time was 69 minutes [range, 19–213], median navigation time to lesion was 8 minutes [range, 1–80], And median polypectomy time was 33.5 minutes [range, 2–143]. Conclusions Endoscopic colon polyp resection with the DBEP was safe with a high technical success rate. The DBEP has the potential to provide enhanced scope stability and visualization, traction, and a conduit for scope exchange. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10191729/ /pubmed/37206694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2057-4286 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Othman, Mohamed O. Diehl, David L. Khara, Harshit S. Jawaid, Salman Yang, Dennis Draganov, Peter V. Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title | Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title_full | Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title_fullStr | Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title_short | Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
title_sort | multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37206694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2057-4286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT othmanmohamedo multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy AT diehldavidl multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy AT kharaharshits multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy AT jawaidsalman multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy AT yangdennis multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy AT draganovpeterv multicenterprospectiveevaluationofanovertubeendoluminalinterventionalplatformforcolorectalpolypectomy |